Bo
Li
a,
Chengbin
Fei
b,
Kaibo
Zheng
ce,
Xuanhui
Qu
a,
Tönu
Pullerits
c,
Guozhong
Cao
ad and
Jianjun
Tian
*a
aInstitute of Advanced Materials and Technology, University of Science and Technology Beijing, 100083, China. E-mail: tianjianjun@mater.ustb.edu.cn
bBeijing Institute of Nanoenergy and Nanosystems, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100083, China
cDepartment of Chemical Physics and NanoLund, Lund University, Box 124, 22100 Lund, Sweden
dDepartment of Materials and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-2120, USA
eGas Processing Center, Department of Chemical Engineering, Qatar University, Qatar
First published on 10th October 2016
Organic–inorganic halide CH3NH3PbI3 (MAPbI3) perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have attracted intensive attention due to their high power conversion efficiency and low fabrication cost. However, MAPbI3 is known to be very sensitive to humidity, and the intrinsic long-term stability of the MAPbI3 film remains a critical challenge. 2-Aminoethanethiol (2-AET) was used as a ligand to bridge the organic compound (MAI) and inorganic compound (PbI2), which restricted the fast growth of PbI2 to realize the synchronous growth environment of MAI and PbI2 crystals, resulting in the formation of a compact MAPbI3 film with polygonal grains. Due to the compact (PbI2)–2-AET–(MAI) molecule barrier layers in the MAPbI3 structure, the resulting perovskite films showed excellent intrinsic water-resistance, with the MAPbI3 perovskite crystal structure retained for a long time (>10 minutes) after immersion in water. This work makes a step towards obtaining long-term stable MAPbI3 perovskite devices.
Moisture stability has become one of the focus areas of MAPbI3 research. For example, the surfaces of devices or perovskite were covered by p-type metal oxides, hydrophobic materials or insulating polymers to enhance the stability of PSCs under an ambient atmosphere.13,16,17 However, the intrinsic water sensitivity of perovskite films remains an unsolved problem. Recently, it was demonstrated that hydrate intermediate compounds, such as MAPbI3·H2O and (MA)4PbI6·2H2O, were formed at the initial stage of the MAPbI3 decomposition process under controlled humidity conditions, and the degradation reaction could be reversed by drying treatment.18–20 In MAPbI3 perovskite crystals, inorganic PbI2 frameworks and organic MA+ cations are bound together by weak hydrogen and ionic bonds. The migration activation energy for MA+ is approximately 0.84 eV, determined by first-principles calculations.21–23 The strength of hydrogen bonding will be reduced when the perovskite crystal is exposed to H2O or other polar solvents, and MA+ would readily separate from octahedral PbI6, resulting in a rapid decomposition of MAPbI3 and degradation of solar cell performance. It has been suggested that chemical modification between organic cation MA+ and inorganic framework PbI6 in MAPbI3 perovskite can be a way to achieve inherent moisture stability.24–26 For example, butylphosphonic acid 4-ammonium chloride was chosen to crosslink neighboring perovskite grains through hydrogen bonding, leading to increased photovoltaic performance and moisture stability.24 2-Aminoethanethiol (2-AET) has been extensively used as a bidentate chelating agent in coordination chemistry, and shows a high affinity toward binding to Pb2+ through the thiolate group.27–31 In addition, the ammonium group in 2-AET molecules would bind MAI by hydrogen bonds in the perovskite structure. Therefore, 2-AET can be a great ligand to improve the intrinsic long-term stability of MAPbI3 perovskite.
The present paper reports the fabrication of a novel water-resistant MAPbI3·2-AET perovskite film, with the MAPbI3 crystal structure retained after immersion in water at room temperature (RT) for a long time (>10 minutes). When 2-AET was added into perovskite precursor solution, the thiolate group of 2-AET molecules facilitates strong interaction with PbI2, while the ammonium group can anchor MAI to form PbI2·2-AET·MAI when DMF is removed, providing a homogeneous environment for perovskite crystal nucleation and growth, and leading to uniform perovskite films with excellent crystallinity.
The standard perovskite precursor solutions were prepared by sequentially dissolving the synthesized 159 mg MAI powder and 462 mg PbI2 (Yingkou You Xuan Trade Co., LTD) in 1 mL N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, 99.8%, Sigma-Aldrich).33 2-Aminoethanethiol (2-AET, 95%, Adamas Regent, Ltd.) was added into the perovskite precursor solutions. The precursor solutions were filtered by using a 0.22 μm pore PVDF syringe filter before spin coating.
45 μL standard perovskite precursor solution was spin coated onto FTO substrates at 3500 rpm for 20 s and 5000 rpm for 10 s, followed by annealing at 100 °C for 10 min.
A MAI·2-AET complex was obtained by adding 3 mL ethyl acetate into 1 mL MAI/2-AET (1:1 mol%) DMF solution, and the solid complex was filtered and dried at 60 °C in a vacuum oven for 3 h. The MAI/PbI2 complex was obtained by adding 3 mL ethyl acetate into perovskite precursor solution (1:1 mol%), and the solid complex was filtered and dried at 60 °C in a vacuum oven for 3 h. The MAI·2-AET·PbI2 complex was obtained by adding 3 mL ethyl acetate into 1 mL 2-AET added perovskite precursor solution (1:1:1 mol%), and the solid complex was filtered and dried at 60 °C in a vacuum oven for 3 h.
The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images, XRD patterns and statistical grain size distribution of final MAPbI3·(x)2-AET perovskite films are illustrated in Fig. 2. In the case of the perovskite film without 2-AET, it clearly shows the typical branch-like perovskite grains with poor coverage on the FTO substrate, which is in accordance with the literature.43,44 The morphology of MAPbI3 perovskite is usually related to the reaction rate between PbI2 and MAI, which depends on their respective solubility and diffusivity in precursor solution.41,45,46 Due to the good crystallinity and poor solubility of PbI2 in precursor solution,35 PbI2 crystals first precipitate out to form an inorganic framework during the spin coating process, and then react with MAI to form MAPbI3 crystals. So the MAPbI3 crystallization process is dominated by the crystallization rate of PbI2. The asynchronous reaction for PbI2 and MAI is likely to lead to the growth of branch-like crystals of MAPbI3. Retarding the crystallization rate of PbI2 is considered an efficient method to obtain uniaxial grains for high performance of PSCs.38,41 As shown in Fig. 2(b)–(f), the addition of 2-AET has changed the morphology, surface coverage and roughness of the perovskite films. The MAPbI3 film consists of compact polygonal perovskite grains when 0.25 M 2-AET is added into the precursor solution. The average size of perovskite grains increases with increasing the addition of 2-AET. As shown in Fig. 2(h), the average grain size is determined to be ∼320 nm for 0.25 M, ∼350 nm for 0.5 M, ∼460 nm for 0.75 M and ∼490 nm for 1 M. The addition of 2-AET reduces the crystallization rate of PbI2, which makes the crystallization synchronization of PbI2 and MAPbI3 form polygonal grains. Fig. 2(g) shows XRD patterns of final MAPbI3·(x)2-AET perovskite films. Diffraction peaks at 14.14° and 28.45° are the only peaks and correspond to (110) and (220) crystal planes of the MAPbI3 perovskite structure,47,48 and revealed significantly preferred orientation with increasing the addition of 2-AET. The diffraction intensity of the perovskite films with 0.5 M and 0.75 M 2-AET increases by an order of magnitude as compared with the perovskite film without 2-AET, which implied better crystallinity of MAPbI3·(x)2-AET perovskite films. No obvious position shift of diffraction peaks is observed. A uniform and compact perovskite film with excellent crystallinity is one of the essential requirements for PSC application.45–47,49
The effect of thermal treatment on the MAPbI3 perovskite films was investigated. Fig. 3(a)–(f) show SEM images of MAPbI3·(0.5)2-AET perovskite films heated at 100 °C for different times. There are many pinholes in the MAPbI3 film without annealing. With the increase of annealing time, perovskite grains grow up and decrease the pinholes. The average grain size of the MAPbI3 grows up to ∼490 nm after annealing at 100 °C for 12 min. So the compact perovskite films are obtained. 2-AET also boosts the growth rate of perovskite crystals during annealing. Fig. S4† shows that the surface coverage of the MAPbI3·(0.75)2-AET perovskite film is higher than that of the MAPbI3·(0.5)2-AET perovskite film after annealing, indicating that the growth rate of perovskite is accelerated by 2-AET. Fig. 3(g) and (h) show XRD patterns of MAPbI3 perovskite films after thermal annealing at 100 °C for different durations. All annealed perovskite films present increased intensity of diffraction peaks of (110) and (220) crystal planes of the MAPbI3 perovskite structure at 14.14° and 28.45°. There is no detectable peak in the films with increasing the duration of thermal annealing. Table S1† shows the decreased full width at half maximum (FWHM) from 0.22 to 0.11, demonstrating the increased crystallinity of perovskite with increased annealing time. The characteristic peaks of the perovskite films are found to shift to lower angles after annealing for 3 min, and then shift back to higher angles after annealing for 12 min. The reason is ascribed to the effect of 2-AET in the MAPbI3 structure. For MAPbI3·(0.5)2-AET, a part of the free PbI2 and MAI change to MAPbI3 after spin coating. The initially formed film has a poor crystallinity and weak optical absorption of MAPbI3 as shown in Table S1 and Fig. S5.† During the annealing process, the 2-AET additive was gradually pushed out to the boundaries of perovskite grains, which increased the perovskite crystal plane spacing. Subsequently, perovskite grains grew up, which tended to gradually decrease the crystal plane spacing.
Fig. 4 is the schematic illustration of the crystallization process of MAPbI3. The branch-like crystals of MAPbI3 are obtained from standard precursor solution via the asynchronous reaction between PbI2 and MAI. When 2-AET is added into the standard precursor solution, the PbI2·2-AET coordination complex is formed to retard the fast crystallization of PbI2. After spin coating at RT, the PbI2·MAI·DMF·2-AET films are obtained, which provide the synchronous growth environment of MAI and PbI2 crystals. There are three stages to finish the crystallization of perovskite crystals during the annealing process. The remnant DMF gradually evaporates and the MAPbI3·PbI2·MAI·2-AET intermediate phase is formed during the annealing stage (1). Then the intermediate phases obtain enough thermal energy to break the coordination interaction of 2-AET in the annealing stage (2), and the 2-AET additive is concentrated in the grain boundaries of perovskite grains. Finally, together with the growth process of perovskite grains, the 2-AET additive is driven from grain boundaries to the surface of perovskite grains in the stage (3) as shown in Fig. S4(d).†
Fig. 4 Schematic illustration of crystallographic conversion during the annealing process. (a) Without the 2-AET additive and (b) with the 2-AET additive. |
Fig. 5(a) shows UV-vis absorbance of MAPbI3 perovskite films prepared with different additions of 2-AET. Without 2-AET, the shape of the spectrum shows clear evidence that the film does not provide perfect coverage and consists of areas of high optical density mixed with uncovered parts.50 The perovskite film prepared with 0.15 M 2-AET shows less of this effect. Clearly, the higher concentration of M 2-AET leads to a high-quality film with close to perfect coverage. We point out that the absorption of perovskite films gradually drops when the addition is more than 0.25 M. It should be attributed to the strong coordination interaction of 2-AET in the perovskite film, which forms the complex in the final film, as indicated by the unknown XRD peaks in Fig. S6.† Besides, the decrease of the absorption of the perovskite films in the 775–800 nm region is caused by the reduced light scattering. The weak light scattering for 2-AET added perovskite films is attributed to the uniform morphology. UV-vis absorption spectra also show a blue shift by ∼30 nm from MAPbI3 to MAPbI3·(0.25)2-AET, which is another evidence for the interaction between PbI2, MAI and 2-AET. The steady-state photoluminescence (PL) spectra in Fig. 5(b) show that the peak of the MAPbI3·(0.5)2-AET perovskite film is blue shifted by ∼30 nm compared to MAPbI3 perovskite.
Fig. 5 UV-vis absorption spectra (a) and normalized steady-state photoluminescence (PL) spectra (b) of MAPbI3·(x)2-AET perovskite films. The excitation wavelength is 465 nm. |
Fig. 6(a) and (b) show the photographs of MAPbI3 and MAPbI3·(0.5)2-AET perovskite films immersed in water for different times at RT. SEM images of the films are shown in Fig. S7 and S8.† It can be seen that the color of MAPbI3·(0.5)2-AET perovskite films remains dark brown after immersion in water, while MAPbI3 perovskite films undergo a rapid color change from dark brown to yellow. This process has also been recorded in Movie S1.† XRD patterns of MAPbI3 and MAPbI3·(0.5)2-AET are shown in Fig. 6(c) and (d). For MAPbI3 perovskite films, PbI2 characteristic peaks at 12.7°, 25.9°, and 34.3° appear after immersion in water for 10 s, and are well indexed to hexagonal PbI2 (JCPDS card no. 07-0235). For MAPbI3·(0.5)2-AET perovskite films, characteristic peaks at 14.15° and 28.46° of MAPbI3 remain after immersion in water from 10 s to 300 s, without the presence of detectable crystalline PbI2. However, the intensity of the peaks decreases gradually with increasing immersion time from 10 s to 300 s. No visible diffraction peak offset nor impurity peaks were observed. Compared to the pristine MAPbI3·(0.5)2-AET perovskite film, the UV-vis absorption of the film is first enhanced in the wavelength range from 450 nm to 800 nm after immersion in water for 10 s as shown in Fig. 6(e). The possible reason is that the excess 2-AET in the perovskite grain boundary is gradually dissolved in water to form holes in the perovskite film (as shown in Fig. S8†), which enhances the light trapping and the light scattering. Then the absorption is gradually decreased in the short wavelength range with increasing immersion time. However, the absorption edge of PbI2 at ∼520 nm as reported in the literature is not found.51 A red shift of the absorption edge from ∼770 nm to ∼780 nm was also observed for all MAPbI3·(0.5)2-AET perovskite films after immersion due to the light scattering. As shown in Fig. 6(f), after immersion, the PL peaks also shift 10 nm from 742 nm to 752 nm. After that, the PL curves do not change with increasing immersion time, indicating that the structure of MAPbI3·(0.5)2-AET is stable in water.
Fig. 7(a) shows XRD patterns of MAPbI3 perovskite films prepared with low addition of 2-AET after immersion in water for 15 s. The degradation rate of MAPbI3·(x)2-AET increases as the amount of 2-AET addition decreases. As shown in Table S2,† after immersion in water for 15 s, the diffraction peak of PbI2 at 12.79° shifts to 12.22° when the addition of 2-AET increases from 0 M to 0.3 M. The decreased intensity with increased FWHM of PbI2 characteristic peaks implies that the MAPbI3 degradation process is suppressed by the presence of 2-AET. The schematic diagram of the degradation process of MAPbI3 and possible mechanism of water-resistant MAPbI3·(x)2-AET perovskite in water are presented in Fig. 7(b) and (c). The MAPbI3 film prepared without the addition of 2-AET degrades rapidly to hexagonal PbI2. However, in the case of the MAPbI3 film prepared with addition of 2-AET, the distribution of 2-AET in perovskite grain boundaries forms compact (PbI2)–2-AET–(MAI) molecule barrier layers, which can effectively prevent H2O from penetrating into MAPbI3 crystals. As a result, although 2-AET dissolves easily in water, MAPbI3·(x)2-AET perovskite shows excellent water-resistance due to the coordination interaction between 2-AET and MAPbI3 by hydrogen bonds.
Fig. 8 shows differential scanning calorimetry/thermogravimetric analysis (DSC/TGA) curves of MAPbI3 and MAPbI3·(0.75)2-AET. The color of MAPbI3·(0.75)2-AET powders changed from yellow to black after the TGA/DSC measurement, while the color of MAPbI3 still remained black. The weight loss for both perovskite powders is approximately the same, 4% from RT to 125 °C, which is attributed to the evaporation of physically adsorbed H2O or DMF. For MAPbI3 powder, the TGA curve stepwise decreases with an obvious endothermic peak at ∼125 °C, likely due to the removal of combined water.52 In the case of MAPbI3·(0.75)2-AET powder, the mass consecutively drops with an increasing temperature from 30 °C to 125 °C, and there is no endothermic peak at ∼125 °C, so the weight loss is related to evaporation of DMF. This may imply that the reported hydrate intermediate compounds (MAPbI3·H2O or (MA)4PbI6·2H2O) are not formed in MAPbI3·(0.75)2-AET powder.18–20 No visible weight loss is observed between 125 °C and 225 °C for MAPbI3 powder, which is consistent with other reports.52–54 The weight loss is 6.64% between 150 °C and 225 °C for MAPbI3·(0.75)2-AET powder, which is close to the amount of (8.54%) 2-AET added into precursor solution. However, as shown in Fig. S9,† for pure 2-AET powder, the weight loss is only 6.27%. In addition, the DSC curve shows obvious endothermic peaks at 200–225 °C, so the poor thermal stability should be attributed to a series of reactions between MAPbI3 and 2-AET, and the reaction products will be evaporated from the perovskite powder.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c6ta06892h |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 |