2014 atomic spectrometry update – a review of advances in environmental analysis

Owen T. Butler *a, Warren R. L. Cairns b, Jennifer M. Cook c and Christine M. Davidson d
aHealth and Safety Laboratory, Harpur Hill, Buxton, UK SK17 9JN, UK. E-mail: owen.butler@hsl.gsi.gov.uk
bCNR-IDPA, Universita Ca' Foscari, 30123 Venezia, Italy
cBritish Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, UK NG12 5GG
dUniversity of Strathclyde, Cathedral Street, Glasgow, UK G1 1XL, UK

Received 3rd November 2014 , Accepted 3rd November 2014

First published on 20th November 2014


Abstract

This is the 30th annual review of the application of atomic spectrometry to the chemical analysis of environmental samples. This Update refers to papers published approximately between August 2013 and July 2014 and continues the series of Atomic Spectrometry Updates (ASUs) in environmental analysis1 that should be read in conjunction with other related ASUs in the series, namely: clinical and biological materials, foods and beverages,2 advances in atomic spectrometry and related techniques,3 elemental speciation,4X-ray fluorescence spectrometry,5 and the analysis of metals, chemicals and functional materials.6 In the field of air analysis, highlights within this review period included: the use of 3D printing technology for the rapid prototyping of new air sampler components; single particle ICP-MS studies; use of a new triple-quadrupole ICP-MS for the analysis of radioactive species and the use of FEG-SEM and IBA for the analysis of gun-shot residues. In the field of water analysis, methods continue to be developed: for the extraction and preconcentration of elements; speciation of As, Cr, Hg and Sb forms and determination of elemental constituents in colloidal and NP fractions. Instrumental developments reported include the use of MC-ICP-MS for isotopic tracer studies and a review of XRF techniques and associated preconcentration procedures for trace element analysis. Many articles featuring the analysis of plants and soils appeared but, as usual, most focused on environmental applications rather than the advancement of atomic spectrometry. There have, however, been interesting developments, such as the almost bewildering increase in types of micro-extraction for analyte preconcentration and the resurgence of CS-AAS. Clearly LIBS is maturing rapidly, with soil analysis becoming more routine in nature. Also notable was the way the accident at the Fukishima-Daiichi nuclear power plant triggered development of analytical methods for the assessment of contamination in the surrounding area. Recent research indicates that geological applications still drives many of the instrumental and methodological advances in LA-ICP-MS. Fundamental studies continue to shed light on the processes involved and hence ways of improving the analysis of laser-produced aerosols. The preparation of NP powders for the production of matrix-matched RMs for microanalytical techniques such as LA-ICP-MS and SIMS showed great promise for addressing one of the major issues when analysing geological materials by these techniques. Steady advances in MC-ICP-MS methodology is feeding through to applications in isotope geochemistry, while new SIMS instrumentation is being directed towards probing fine growth structures in biogenic carbonates and inferring past climate conditions from their geochemistry. Feedback on this review is most welcome and the review coordinator can be contacted using the email address provided.


1 Air analysis

1.1 Review papers

A series of review papers was published as part of a wider initiative to design the next generation of air quality indicators. Current monitoring techniques and modelling approaches were included in an introductory overview7 (39 references), a review of suspended particulate matter8 (50 references) and a review of Hg and its compounds in air9 (141 references). Vehicular emissions have received increased attention over the last few years and information regarding the sampling and measurement of tail-pipe particulate emissions has now been tabulated10 (310 references). Reviews of techniques for the determination of individual pollutants in air are most welcome: organomercury compounds in environmental samples11 (176 references); elemental, equivalent black and refractory black carbon aerosol particles12 (267 references) and 129I in air13 (104 references). An overview on the key role of atomic spectrometry in radiation protection was also published14 (292 references).

1.2 Sampling techniques

The development of personal air samplers to monitor workers' exposure to airborne NPs is of growing interest. A new sampler consisted of a pre-cyclone for to collect respirable particles, micro-orifice impactor stages with an acceleration nozzle to size NPs and a backup filter to collect residual particles.15 The cyclone and impactor stages had d50 cut-off diameters of 3.95 μm and 94.7 nm respectively, thus meeting the desired design specifications. A new personal sampler utilised thermophoretic force to collect NPs onto a standard TEM grid.16 A test aerosol consisting of saline particles in the range 20–600 nm was generated using a collision nebuliser and particle numbers and size were continuously monitored with a SMPS. Particles subsequently collected with this new sampler were examined by electron microscopy. By using both sets of data, sampler inlet losses and collection efficiencies could be determined. These experimental results, together with a theoretical understanding of thermophoretic velocities, were used to formulate a transfer function that related the properties of the collected particles to the properties of the sampled aerosol. This function used a normalisation factor that was greater than one for very small particles but which approached unity for particles larger than ca. 70 nm. The ongoing debate about the best NP metric for exposure assessment, be it mass, number or surface area, has led researchers to propose an alternative but interesting metric.17 A new quasi-real-time sampler-detector, called the catalytic activity aerosol monitor, exploited the use of specific catalytical reactions between test gases and engineered NPs collected on a filter. Laboratory studies demonstrated that Ni catalyzed the oxidation of CO to CO2 and that Pd and Pt catalysed the hydrogenation of ethene to ethane. Such gas-phase conversions were monitored using an IR detector. The linear relationships between mass-on-filter and the detector output meant that this prototype monitor could provide a means of quantifying certain metallic NPs in workplace air. More research is obviously required to assess the viability of this approach.

Alternative approaches for assessing worker exposure included the use of ICP-MS to measure the concentration of metals such as Fe and Mn in exhaled particles from welders.18–20 Exhaled breath was collected through a sampling inlet, reminiscent of an alcohol breathalyser, into a Peltier-cooled collection vial. Challenges included measuring ultratrace levels, relating measured elemental concentration to dose and minimising the potential from cross contamination with non-inhaled particles such as those deposited on the lips.

New ambient air samplers continue to be developed. A high-volume aerosol-into-liquid sampler was developed to preconcentrate fine particulate matter into a slurry sample.21 A laboratory study indicated that collection efficiencies were >90% over the particle size range 0.01–2 μm whilst field tests indicated that the system was capable of continuous and unattended operation over 2–3 days at a nominal flow rate of 200 L min−1. A multistage sampler, designed to mimic deposition of aerosol in different parts of the human respiratory system, employed foam and nylon mesh to act as both particle size selectors and collection substrates.22 These substrates were not amenable to gravimetric (mass) analysis due to effects of humidity on weighing but were suitable for chemical analysis. Collecting a defined particle fraction is often required and studies evaluating new sampler inlet designs continue to be reported. The majority of airborne measurements of aerosols employ forward-facing inlets with near isokinetic sampling but these inlets have limitations when sampling in clouds due to artifact formation when liquid or ice cloud particles collide with inlet surfaces. To alleviate this problem a new perpendicular inlet23 was successfully developed to allow small particles (<1 μm) to be sampled to the exclusion of cloud particles (>1 μm) with no discernible artifact response. A streamlined, high-volume particle impactor24 employed a single round jet designed to operate at a flow rate of 1000 L min−1. The novelty of this study was not necessarily the design of this new impactor but the combination of computational fluid dynamic tools with rapid prototyping using 3D printer technology. This reviewer is aware of other research groups working in this field who are also exploiting this new powerful 3D printer technology.

Urban air quality can be severely affected by traffic-derived particulate matter. Sources of particles include tail-pipe emissions, brake pad and tyre wear and resuspension of road dust by vehicular motion or wind. Techniques involving resuspension of settled road dust in a laboratory setting are not entirely satisfactory as they may not mimic street conditions. A mobile road dust sampler,25 which consisted of an air sampler mounted on a motorised laboratory trolley, induced resuspension and collected particles directly from road surfaces, and had the ability to collect particles in two size ranges, PM1–10 and PM1. A garden leaf blower was used to resuspend particles under a road surface sampling hood, attached to the front of the trolley and connected via tubing to the air sampler. The authors suggested that this new approach may offer a better method for unbiased sample collection. Continuing the theme of using components designed for other uses, air filters in car engines have been advocated26,27 as potentially useful urban air samplers. Filters from taxis were used as mobile high-volume air samplers and provided city-wide integrated air concentrations at street level. Approximate air volumes sampled were derived from consideration of the fuel consumption or the engine volume and the associated rpm data. Measured values for a range of elemental species and PAHs were comparable with those derived from more conventional TSP air samplers. Satellite navigation technology could also be employed in logging the itineraries of the vehicles and thus assisting in the future development of urban pollution maps.

The recent UNEP convention binding countries to reduce mercury emissions will require developments in air sampling technologies. New Cl and I-impregnated activated carbon traps were evaluated28 as a means of preconcentrating air samples in order to meet the challenge of collecting sufficient sample for Hg stable isotope research. The low level blank, ca. 0.3 ng Hg per g of sorbent, in preconditioned traps equated to <3% of the Hg collected in a typical sample. Recoveries were calculated using a Hg vapour spike of known isotopic composition. No induced isotopic artifacts occurred when recoveries were >81% but a positive mass dependent fractionation bias was observed when recoveries were <81%. Mercury emissions arising from spontaneous combustion within landfill sites represent an anthropogenic source that historically has been overlooked in many Hg inventory estimates. New real-time Hg measurements conducted at a large urban landfill site29 were made using a field-deployable analyser integrated with a newly developed relaxed eddy accumulation (REA) approach. This REA technique is a micro-metrological method that allows measurement of spatially averaged air-surface exchange Hg fluxes over a much larger area (ca. 1 ha) than the few m2 typically sampled by enclosure systems. Ambient air concentrations above the landfill site increased from a baseline of 43 ± 20 to 396 ± 114 ng m−3 following one such combustion event. In light of this work, the authors suggested that data for spontaneous combustion of refuse in landfill sites should be included in future Hg emissions inventory estimates.

1.3 Reference materials and calibrants

Filter reference materials containing sulfur for XRF calibration30 were prepared by using a desolvating nebuliser in a test chamber and collecting the particles generated on filters. A typical dust-on-filter deposition pattern at appropriate sample filter mass loading was reproduced by using the same air sampler and filter media combination used for real air samples. These RMs matched real air samples more closely and further work is being undertaken to develop and characterise other multielement calibration filters. Reference materials such as NIST SRM 1649a (urban dust) and NIST SRM 2584 (indoor dust) are widely used in laboratories conducting air quality measurements. Further characterisation31 of these materials was undertaken using EPMA, SEM, TEM, XANES and XRD techniques in order to provide information on the speciation of Cr, Mn and Pb. The development of NIST SRM 2951-2958 (respirable alpha-quartz on filters) and NIST SRM 2961-2967 (respirable cristobalite on filters) covering the mass range of 5–1000 μg per filter was summarised.32 These SRMs were prepared by suspending bulk crystalline SRMs in water and spiking an aliquot of the resultant slurry suspensions onto filters. Total Si was determined by ICP-AES as a surrogate marker for batch homogeneity assessment because XRD or FTIR methods were insufficiently sensitive. Representative filter samples were dissolved in HF and neutralised using TMAH prior to sample nebulisation and analysis. Certified values and their associated uncertainties were derived from the ICP-AES data, together with consideration of the purity and crystallinity of the starting bulk SRM materials and the spike volume. Work undertaken at IRMM on the development of CRMs and associated reference methods for nuclear safeguards and security has been summarised.33

1.4 Sample preparation

The well-worn path of assessing sample dissolution procedures continues to be trodden. An assessment34 of the performance of 5 digestion methods involved both hotplate and microwave-assisted procedures. Acid mixtures containing variable amounts of HF, HCl, HClO4 and H2O2 with HNO3 were used to digest test aliquots of NIST SRM 1648a (urban particulate matter). Elemental recoveries using a HNO3–HF acid reflux procedure were typically >80% except for Cr for which mean recoveries were 46%. However, it is known that Cr in this particular SRM exists in a refractory chromite phase. A study35 on the solubility of traffic-related metal(loid)s associated with airborne particulate matter employed a physiologically-based extraction test with two simulated lung fluids, artificial lysosomal fluid (ALF) and Gamble's solution. Airborne dust samples, size fractionated in PM10, PM2.5 and PM1, were collected onto filters using a high volume air sampler. Following extraction of the soluble fraction, residues were dissolved in acid using a high pressure asher. Arsenic, Cu, Sb and V in the PM10 fraction had the highest bioaccessibility. A method36 was proposed to fractionate atmospheric particulate matter into three components: the water-soluble fraction; the insoluble non-nanometric fraction; and the fraction containing insoluble NPs. The procedure simply involved the ultrasonication of aliquots of either bulk SRM NIST 1649a (urban dust) or filter samples, in water, to leach the soluble phase followed by centrifugation to separate the insoluble non-nanometric fraction from the insoluble NP phase which remained in suspension. The alkaline and alkaline earth metals were typically found in the water-soluble phase and many elements typically emitted from combustion sources (As, Cd, Pb, Sb, Sn and V) were present in airborne matter as insoluble NPs.

Technique-specific sample preparation procedures have been advocated. Sample pretreatment strategies37 for TXRF analysis of particulates included in situ microdigestion, slurry preparation, acid digestion and other extraction procedures. To undertake high precision Hg stable isotope measurements sufficient amounts of Hg (>10 ng) are required but the acid digestion of natural samples with low Hg concentrations (<1–10 ng g−1), such as pulverised coal and fly ash, is challenging. An elegant solution38 lay in the use of combustion to liberate Hg from solid matrices, reduction to Hg0 and trapping in acidic solution. Solution aliquots were then introduced into a MC-ICP-MS instrument using a CV technique. Provided that Hg recoveries were within 80–120%, no systematic dependence of Hg isotopic composition on the % recovery was observed, echoing findings reported earlier in this review. The limited transfer of residual sample matrix into the acid solution was beneficial as it minimised the potential for matrix interference on the CV reductant step. Peak area measurements in conjunction with a standard addition calibration protocol was proposed39 to minimise this matrix effect observed when Hg in impinger samples, derived from stack emissions, were analysed using CV-AFS.

1.5 Instrumental analysis

1.5.1 Atomic absorption spectrometry. Three review papers40–42 considered the development of the HR-CS-ETAAS technique. Welz et al.40 (174 references) highlighted the advantage of systems equipped with a CCD detector which adds the wavelength as a third dimension to the conventional display of absorbance over time. The ability to measure elements such as the halogen elements, P and S using molecular absorption spectrometry41,42 (98 and 108 references respectively) was highlighted. A method43 for the determination of S in coal and ash slurry samples achieved a LOD of 0.01%, an RSD of 6% and recoveries within the certified values given for NIST 1632b (trace elements in coal) and NIST 1633b (coal fly ash). Although S is normally determined using an elemental analyser, this new AAS method allowed S to be determined together with a range of other elements. The LOD and LOQ values for both Mo and Sb in street dust44 measured by solid sampling HR-CS-ETAAS were 15 and 50 μg g−1, respectively. The characteristic mass was 28 pg at the Mo 313.259 nm line and 38 pg at the Sb 217.582 nm line. The recoveries from the three CRMs, BCR CRM 176R (fly ash), NIST SRM 1648 (urban particulate matter) and NIST SRM 1649a (urban dust), overlapped the certified ranges. The elegance of the SS-HR-CS-ETAAS technique was thus demonstrated for the determination of trace elements in dust samples that can be difficult to digest with conventional acid digestions. However it must be recognised that well-homogenised powdered samples are required to generate precise results on account of the small sample masses involved.

On-line AAS techniques for process monitoring have been evaluated. A CVAAS technique45 for determining Hg in fuel gases involved the use of a cyclic combustion pretreatment unit which consisted of an electrically heated quartz tube reactor filled with an oxygen source (NiO) dispersed onto quartz sand. Gas samples were fed into the heated reactor and combusted and a condenser used to separate H2O from the CO2 produced, allowing Hg0 to be determined. To complete the cycle, the reduced Ni surface was subsequently regenerated by oxidation in air. By operating two reactors in parallel so that one could be in operation while the other was being regenerated, it was possible to make continuous Hg measurements. The feasibility of determining Hg in naphtha and petroleum condensate by PVG has been investigated.46 Samples were presented as a micro emulsion in propan-1-ol mixed with a small amount of water. Additional agents for promoting the generation of volatile Hg compounds were unnecessary. The LOD for a 1 mL micro emulsion test aliquot was 0.6 μg L−1, the spike recoveries were 92–113% and the sample throughput was 6 samples h−1. No Hg was found in the naptha samples tested although concentrations of 76–105 μg L−1 were obtained for the petroleum condensate samples examined.

1.5.2 Atomic emission spectrometry. Consolidation of information regarding developments of LIBS can be found in three reviews.47–49 Radziemski and Cremers47 (59 references) sketched out the historical development and advances in the methodologies and instrumentation over the last 50 years culminating with a synopsis of the LIBS 2012 conference. Another review48 (21 references) focused on industrial applications of this technique including the analysis of coals, slags and dusts whilst a third review49 (61 references) not only covered environmental pollution but also applications in biomedicine, botany, metallurgy and space exploration. In a study of a new low-pressure laser-induced plasma technique50 intended for the determination of Hg in power plant emissions, it was noted that black-body-like emissions from the plasma itself and other concomitant atomic and molecular emissions decreased significantly under low pressure conditions. At a pressure of 700 Pa, a LOD of 0.3 ppm was achievable. Ongoing work will assess the feasibility of this approach in real applications.
1.5.3 Mass spectrometry.
1.5.3.1 Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. A new triple-quadrupole ICP-MS configuration was exploited to measure radioactive fall-out from the recent Fukushima nuclear incident. In the study of radioactive Cs in rainwater,51 N2O was used as reaction gas to lessen the isobaric interference of 134Ba, 135Ba and 137Ba, on 134Cs, 135Cs and 137Cs respectively, by converting the atomic species to oxide and hydroxide species thus increasing their masses and shifting them away from the analyte masses. The additional quadrupole in front of the reaction cell was tuned to reject entry of Sb and Sn ions that would otherwise have resulted in additional unwanted isobaric interferences from SbO and SnO. Measured 134Cs/137Cs values were consistent with those determined using a more conventional but slower radiochemical method. In another paper, 129I washout from rainwater was measured in soils.52 The iodine fractions were extracted from the soils by pyrohydrolysis and purified by solvent extraction. The background intensity at m/z 129 arising from 129Xe impurities in the argon plasma gas was reduced by converting it from an ionic to a non-detectable neutral species using O2 as a reaction gas. An off-set correction approach corrected for residual isobaric interferences such as 127IH2+ and 127ID+ on 129I by assuming a production ratio of 5 × 10−9. The measured 129/127I ratio in NIST SRM 3231 (iodine isotopic standard-level II) was within analytical error of the certified value thereby demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Values determined in soils samples were also consistent with values determined by AMS, further proving the viability of this new ICP-MS approach.

Analysis of atmospheric particles by ICP-MS is a fertile research topic. A new aerosol sampler interface53 consisted of five components: an aerosol inlet; a desolvating nebuliser to provide a calibrant aerosol; an enrichment system to grow small particles through saturation and condensation; a round virtual impactor to preconcentrate aerosols and a membrane drier. This interface gave a BEC for 238U particles of ca. 1 pg m−3. A more conventional ETV-ICP-MS approach54 involving slurry sampling was used to determine Au, Pd, Pt and Ru in road dust samples. Suspensions at a nominal 5% (m/v) were prepared, 2% (m/v) APDC was added as a modifier to enhance the ion count and a standard addition calibration strategy was employed. The LOD was 0.4–0.9 ng g−1. An analytical method55 which combined thermal analysis with ID-CV-ICP-MS for studying Hg in airborne particulate matter was used to quantify Hgp in airborne particulate matter. Method validation was carried out through the analysis of NIST SRM 1633b (mercury in fly ash) for which the measured concentration of 0.139 ± 0.009 μg g−1 was in good agreement with the certified value of 0.141 ± 0.019 μg g−1 obtained with a microwave-assisted acid digestion and CV-AFS. For air samples, more Hgp was collected on undenuded filters than on filters that employed a KCl-coated denuder to remove co-sampled gaseous Hg species. This excess Hg was thought to be most likely due to reactive gaseous Hg partitioning to particulates during sampling.

The characterisation of single particles by ICP-MS is an even more fertile area of research. Improvements suggested included: optimisation56 of the dwell time to minimise the occurrence of more than one particle being measured concurrently; a signal deconvolution method57 to discriminate between NPs <30 nm in size; determining analyte partitioning during nebulisation to improve accuracy of size distribution and number concentration measurements;58 online coupling59 of IEC to remove soluble components so that the discrete signal from individual NPs could be discriminated more easily from the continuous signal derived from dissolved NPs; and the evaluation60 of helium-assisted evaporation of NP-containing microdroplets.

The use of ICP-MS for isotopic measurements continues to be investigated. The Dumarey equation has been the dominant mathematic relationship for calculating the mass concentration of saturated Hg0 vapour in air within a closed system at a defined temperature for over 25 years and is widely used for calibrating Hg-in-air analysers. However the origin of the equation and validation data supporting its accuracy has never been fully published thus presenting difficulties for regulatory Hg measurements that require traceability to the SI. A novel ID-ICP-MS measurement procedure61 mixed Hg air samples with liquid samples that contained an enriched Hg isotope spike and demonstrated that the saturated Hg mass concentration at room temperature (ca. 21 °C) was on average 5.8% higher than that calculated from the Dumarey equation. This procedure provided results traceable to the SI and further measurements at defined temperatures are anticipated once this system has been thermostated. Use of a total consumption nebuliser62 operating at a flow rate of 20 μL min−1 allowed 208Pb/207Pb and 206Pb/207Pb ratios to be determined accurately by DRC ICP-MS with an internal precision of 0.12–0.13% and 0.17–0.18% (n = 10, 10 s integration time and a test solution of 10 μg L−1 Pb) respectively. Collisional dampening in the DRC cell which was pressurised with NH3 improved the precision. The total sample consumption was 200 μL. This new approach was applied to the analysis of atmospheric particles, snow, suspended marine particles and sediments. In the nuclear sector, a new method63 was based upon the use of a fs laser operated at 10 kHz and quadrupole ICP-MS for the analysis of μm-sized U particles. By optimising the experimental conditions, it was possible to measure 235U/238U with an accuracy and reproducibility of <4% when using short transient signals of only 15 s and masses of 10–200 pg U. A LOD (3σ) of 350 ag was achieved suggesting that this system is a promising alternative to more conventional SIMS and FTA-TIMS techniques.


1.5.3.2 Other mass spectrometry techniques. A review64 (142 references) of instrumental developments in AMS highlighted the increased use of this technique, due to the ongoing reduction in size and complexity of instruments. A companion review65 (268 references) considered the ultra-sensitive detection of long-lived radionuclides and their applications in the study of the seven domains of the environment: atmosphere, biosphere, cosmosphere, cryosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere and technosphere.

Improvements in techniques for the isotopic analysis of gaseous species have been published. High-precision He isotope measurements66 were made possible by purifying a large quantity of air at the start of measurement cycle, controlling the amount of He in each measured aliquot to minimise pressure effects and by employing a standard-sample-standard bracketing protocol. Long-term reproducibility over several months was 0.0033%. The single and triple measurement precisions were 0.2–0.3% (2σ) and <0.1% respectively. The authors suggested that measurement precision is now at the level required to undertake research to assess temporal variations in atmospheric He isotopes. A sensitive RIMS67 for monitoring Kr and Xe isotope ratios in gases potentially emitted in a nuclear reactor incident had an error of <3% at a nuclide concentration of 7 ppt when measured over a period of 40 minutes. A system68 for measuring δ13C ratios in organic aerosols captured on filters linked a TD oven to an IRMS instrument via a combustion interface. For the aerosol samples examined, the reproducibilities were <± 0.3% and <± 0.5% for desorption temperatures of <200 °C and >200 °C respectively.

Characterisation of U in particles released from facilities can be a useful tool for nuclear safeguarding purposes. A methodology69 employed SIMS to detect and analyse particles that contain both F and U so as to provide information on their origin and an insight into the U purification, conversion and enrichment steps employed. An improved FTA-TIMS method70 addressed the problem of particle losses during manipulation of samples by suspending U-particles in a solution of cellulose nitrate co-mixed with isoamyl acetate, spreading onto a glass surface and drying to form a transparent film. After irradiation and etching, particles were located under a microscope, cut out and transferred to a filament for analysis. Non-elemental techniques can be used to derive complimentary analytical data. A sorptive extraction method71 was developed for the analysis of non-volatile organic ligands in an attempt to identify characteristics of the purification process by which U is separated from its ores. Organic components were extracted from aqueous media by stir-bar technology and analysed directly within the inlet of a GC-MS system.

1.5.4 X-ray spectrometry. A review72 (6 references) of the application of μXRF techniques for the characterisation of nuclear materials highlighted the unique capability of this non-destructive technique to image Pu residues and other elements deposited on large surface wipes.

Analysis of airborne particles on filters by EDXRF spectrometry employed a FP calibration protocol.73 For airborne concentrations of >100 ng m−3 the EDXRF results agreed with those obtained by ICP-MS for Ni, Pb and S and by ICP-AES for Ca, Cu, Fe, Mn Ti and Zn. Divergences noted for Mn, Ni and Pb at lower concentrations were attributed to spectral overlaps that compromised FP calculations and to the presence of Ni in blank filters. Trace levels of P were determined74 in marine aerosols by SRXRF to study the atmospheric transfer of nutrients to the oceans and their role in marine plankton growth. Phosphorous was present in the range 2–180 ng m−3 and the method LOD was ca. 0.2 ng m−3. The release from fabrics of Ag NPs, added to consumer products because of their antimicrobial properties, was studied using a TXRF method.75 The sample cell was purged with N2 to eliminate interferent Ar peaks and an LOD of 0.2 ng Ag was achieved. The Ag NPs were typically released attached to fibrous material in the particle size range 0.13–2 μm. Crystalline silica collected on filters is typically determined by XRD spectrometry. The linearity of X-ray response with sample mass is not affected if the dust layer remains thin but as the filter loading increases, attenuation of the X-ray beam can result in a breakdown of this linear relationship. The critical sample mass76 for a dust sample collected with a commonly used 25 mm diameter filter/cyclonic sampler combination was ca. 0.9 mg if a deviation of no more 10% from linearity was acceptable.

Speciation of airborne particles by X-ray techniques continues to be investigated. Use of the XANES technique showed77 that coarse aerosol particles consisted of PbC2O4, 2PbCO3·Pb(OH)2 and Pb(NO3)2 present whereas fine particles consisted of PbC2O4, Pb(NO3)2 and PbSO4. This suggested that the sources of Pb were different for the two size fractions. Atmospheric soluble Fe particles can be a significant source of nutrition for phytoplankton in oceans but factors affecting the availability of this bioaccessible fraction are not fully understood. Fitting of XAFS spectra coupled with μXRF analysis showed78 the main Fe species in aerosol samples collected to be illite, ferrhydrite, hornblende and FeIII sulfate. The soluble Fe fraction in samples determined by leach tests correlated with the FeIII sulfate content determined by XANES suggesting that this species was the dominant soluble Fe species in oceans. An XPS study79 of size-fractionated urban aerosols identified C as the dominant species on the surfaces of all particles studied regardless of size. However, higher concentrations were noted on the surfaces of particles in the 0.056–0.32 μm size range than on the surfaces of the other size fractions. The concentrations of Ca, N, O and Si were higher on the surface of 3.2–10 μm particles than on the surfaces of smaller particles whereas S was found mainly on the surface of 0.32–1.8 μm particles. A study80 to ascertain whether XPS was capable of discriminating between elemental and organic carbon found that: aliphatic and aromatic species adsorbed on particle surfaces; higher concentrations of elemental carbon were present in the bulk than on the surface of particles; comparable levels of sulphate species were found on the surface and in the bulk; nitrogen species appeared to be concentrated on the surface of particles and the presence of a signal attributed to the presence of organo-S compounds was noted.

Optimisation of a new FEG-SEM system for GSR analysis was described81 in detail so as to allow other potential users of this technique to follow the protocol. Use of the latest heavy metal-free (HMF) primers requires new forensic solutions to be developed. A comparison82 of elemental spectra obtained by both SEM-EDS and IBA-PIXE spectrometry showed that the latter was much more sensitive at mid-high energies. In summary, this integrated approach incorporating IBA had, according to the authors, unprecedented characterisation and discriminatory potential for future GSR studies. More prosaic but nevertheless a serious and under-researched issue, the potential for secondary transfer of GSR via contact between a shooter and a second (innocent) person was examined83 using a series of simulation exercises that involved SEM-EDS analysis.

1.5.5 Other spectrometric techniques. Two useful review papers on the analysis of carbonaceous particles covered techniques (267 references)12 for the characterisation of elemental, equivalent and refractory black carbon aerosol particles and the application84 (89 references) of 14C analyses to the source apportionment of atmospheric particulate matter.

Measuring carbonaceous particles in wet deposition samples is critical for a more complete understanding of the global circulation, lifetime and radiative forcing of such aerosols but there is currently no accepted standard analytical method for measuring such particles in rain or snow samples. Two papers addressed this issue. In the first,85 a USN was used to disperse sample water into μm-sized droplets which were then dried to release black carbon particles for analysing using a single particle soot photometer (SP2) which was connected to the outlet of this nebuliser. Laboratory studies showed that the transfer efficiency for particles in the size range 200–500 nm was ca. 10%. The accuracy and reproducibility of the measured mass concentration of black carbon in sample water after long term storage was ±25% and ±35% respectively. In the second paper86 techniques including TOA, SP2, UV-Vis and TOC determination were evaluated and their strengths and limitations tabulated. Based upon findings presented, either SP2 or TOA with a filtration step combined with TOC analysis for measurement of dissolved organic carbon held promise for the future analysis of carbonaceous aerosol in rainwater.

The aethalometer, an instrument which collects airborne particulate matter onto a filter while continuously measuring its light transmission, has been widely deployed to measure black carbon. Underpinning the use of this technique in a quantification mode is the mass absorption efficiency (MAE), also known as the mass absorption cross section, which varies depending upon the source of the carbonaceous particles. The utility of this technique to reliably measure woodsmoke concentrations has been called into question87 on account of concern over variability in MAE values. In a detailed study,88 MAE values of 3.1, 6.6, 9.5 and 7.9 m2 g−1 were determined in smoke samples from residential wood burning, straw burning, biomass pellet and coal combustion respectively. A novel approach89 for the direct and continuous measurement of black carbon mass size distribution involved coupling a differential mobility analyser to an aethalometer. The performance of the new pocket-size MicroAeth® for fixed-site monitoring was compared90 to that of its bigger brother, a rack-mounted system usually deployed at the kerb-side, and it was found that the black carbon results were ca. 14% higher with this new variant. The authors concluded that differences in results may be due to differences in aerosol deposition velocities, sample spot sizes, filter media and attenuation cross-section parameters between the two instruments. In contrast, good agreement between the variants was noted where a near 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 correlation was reported.91

A novel colorimetric-based technology92 applied a “lab on a chip” approach to measure elements in welding fume collected on a filter. This emerging technology, known as microfluidic paper-based analytical device (μPAD), employed hydrophobic barriers printed onto paper to define fluidic circuits that control liquid (sample) transport and which were chemically modifiable to allow customisation of the colorimetric endpoint for assaying a particular metal e.g. Fe as the reddish ferroin complex after complexation with 1,10 phenanthroline. In this reported study, 10 mm filter punches were taken and subjected to a microwave-assisted digestion to dissolve the sampled welding fume. The digestate was then applied to a μPAD which was moved to the detector zone for the resultant coloured spot to be scanned using a desk-based office scanner. Quantification was achievable by subjecting metal solutions of a known concentration to the same process. Separate welding fume filter punches were subjected to a conventional ICP-AES analysis for comparison. For acid-extractable Cr, Cu, Fe and Ni, 20 of the 28 paired measurements were not statistically different at a 95% CI. The differences for the remaining 8 pairs were <20%. The authors concluded that μPAD-based technology offered the potential to bring a low cost measurement approach to the field although the sampling costs associated with taking air samples would also need addressing. Future work will focus on μPAD modifications to improve sensitivity, quantitative range and functionality in addition to extending the method to other elements.

In the framework of nuclear safeguards, μRaman spectroscopy was coupled93 to SEM for the first time to analyse μm-sized U oxides particles deposited on carbon disks. This allowed in situ Raman analysis to be performed on particles located by SEM. The reduction in sample manipulation was deemed to outweigh the reduction in instrumental sensitivity when using a coupled system over a more sensitive but stand-alone Raman instrument. A method94 for the determination of NiII compounds in size-resolved airborne particles employed a derivatisation reaction with DMG to form a complex with strong characteristic stretches at 1352 and 1510 cm−1. Validation was undertaken using μm-sized aerosols generated by the atomisation of individual NiCO3, Ni(OH)2, NiO and NiSO4 species as well as NiSO4 mixed with ammonium sulfate, humic and oxalic acids which did not interfere with the detection of NiII. Raman microspectroscopy was also used to determine the chemical composition and mixing state of marine aerosols95 and to characterise soot and mineral phases in urban aerosols.96

1.6 Method intercomparisons

Comparative testing of methods or techniques is always useful. The need to evaluate personal exposure to urban aerosols instead of simply measuring outdoor concentrations at fixed locations is now evident. Cascade impactor samplers (CISs) employing gravimetric analysis and optical particle counters (OPCs) are likely to be used, on account of their size, weight and low cost. In a field setting, results obtained using both CIS and OPC devices were compared97 to those obtained from standardised gravimetric methods for PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 that employed EU approved air samplers. Particulate concentrations measured using OPCs were biased low on days when air concentrations were low and biased high when air concentrations were high. In contrast, gravimetric data were generally comparable irrespective of whether the CIS or approved EU sampler were used. Similarly, two performance testing studies98,99 highlighted the differences that can be obtained when personal measurements are made with different samplers in a workplace setting. A collaborative trial100 which generated method performance data for a new US EPA ICP-MS method for the determination of Pb in air particles included a comparison with the established reference method employing FAAS. The characterisation of engineered NPs for environmental impact assessment purposes requires analytical methods for quantification of both the absolute mass concentration and the dissolved fraction. Test suspensions of Ag, Ce, Ti and Zn NPs were analysed101 by ICP-MS either: directly; or following acidification or following a microwave-assisted digestion. Of five fractionation methods (centrifugation, CPE, dialysis, TFF and UF) compared with an ISE method for the determination of the dissolved fraction, UF with microwave digestion was identified as best practice on the basis of applicability, economics and precision.

2 Water analysis

2.1 Sample preconcentration and extraction

The review articles published recently looked at specific aspects of preconcentration for various matrices including waters. One review102 (160 references) discussed the state-of-the-art in the use of microbacterial-based solid sorbents. The targeted extraction of individual analytes or groups of analytes103 (240 references) by modifying the surface properties of NPs, CNTs, bioabsorbents or ion imprinting polymers was considered in a review covering the period 2007–2012. Of particular interest was a review104 (79 references) on the use of SPE for the speciation and preconcentration of inorganic Se in water samples. Tables 1 and 2 summarise the most significant developments in analyte preconcentration for water analysis.
Table 1 Preconcentration methods using solid phase extraction for the analysis of water
Analyte(s) Matrix Substrate Coating or modifying agent Detector Figures of merit (μg L−1 unless otherwise stated) Method validation References
CdII and PbII Water and biological samples TiO2 NPs Alizarin red S FAAS LODs 0.11 (Cd) and 0.30 (Pb), 200 mL sample Comparison with ETAAS of NIST SRM 1643e (trace elements in water) 129
Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ga, Mn, Ni, Pb, Se, V, and Zn Water MWCNT ED-XRF, WD-XRF and polarised-ED-XRF LODs 0.06 (Zn, polarised-ED-XRF) 16.7 (Cd, ED-XRF), 100 mL sample 130
CoII, CuII, NiII, PbII, and ZnII Water Graphene oxide None ED-XRF LODs 0.5 (co) to 1.8 (Zn), 50 mL sample Spike recovery (94–106%) and comparison with ICP-AES results 131
Hg Water CNT Ag and Fe3O4 AFS LODs 0.03, 200 mL sample NRCCRM GBW07310 (stream sediment) and spike recovery (84–120%) 132
Hf, lanthanides, Y and Zr Seawater Coprecipitation on Fe2O3 None ICP-MS LODs 2.1 (ho) to 408.3 (La) ng L−1, 1 litre sample volume Spike recovery, authors report values for NRCC NASS-6 (seawater) 133
Ho, Nd, Tb Water TiO2 nanotubes None ICP-MS LODs (tb) 0.018 to 0.093 (Nd) ng L−1, 100 fold enrichment factor Spike recovery (93–104%) 134
Pb isotopes Seawater cF-Chelate 650 M® resin None ICP-MS Analysis precision 206Pb/207Pb 0.6‰, 500 mL sample NIST SRM-981 (common lead), comparison with previous methods 135
Pu isotopes Seawater Coprecipitation with Fe(OH)3 followed by 2-stage separation on Dowex 1X8 SAX resin None SF-ICP-MS LODs 0.08 (240Pu) to 0.11 (239Pu) fg mL−1 NBS-947 (plutonium isotopic standard), IAEA-381 and IAEA-443 (seawater) 136
REE Seawater Chromosorb® 106 4-(2-Thiazolylazo) resorcinol ICP-MS LODs (pr) 0.06 to (Ce) 0.31 ng L−1, 5 mL sample NRCC CASS-4 (nearshore seawater) 137
SeIV Water Porous carbon electrode Au ETAAS LOD 0.1, 10 mL sample NIST SRM 1643e (trace elements in water), HPS primary drinking water metals check standard 138


Table 2 Preconcentration methods using liquid phase extraction for the analysis of water
Analyte(s) Matrix Method Reagent(s) Detector Figures of merit (LOD μg L−1 unless otherwise stated) Method validation References
Ag and Cu Food and water Ultrasound IL-ME Dithizone and 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate FAAS 1.2 (Ag) and 2.0 (Cu), 25 mL sample volume Spike recovery 139
B Water and plants Headspace liquid phase microsublimation NaOH ICP-AES 8.0 for 0.1 mL of sample Spike recovery 140
CuO nanoparticles Water CPE followed by microwave digestion Triton X-114 ICP-MS and ETAAS 0.02 (ICP-MS) and 0.06 (ETAAS), 10 mL sample Spike recovery 141
Cu and Zn Water DLLME 2-(5-Bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-diethyl-phenol, carbon tetrachloride and methanol ED-XRF 1.8 (Cu) to 1.7 (Zn) ng L−1, 5 mL sample Spike recovery (91–95%) and comparison with ICP-AES 142
CH3Hg+ Humic rich water N2 distillation followed by purge and trap Sodium tetraethylborate (purge and trap stage) ID-GC-ICP-MS 0.05 ng L−1 20 mL of sample Comparison with US EPA 1630 method 143


2.2 Speciation and fractionation analysis

The determination of arsenic species without chromatography remains of interest. In a simple method105 using stacked SPE disks, diphenylarsinic acid was trapped from a 200 mL sample at pH 3 on the upper Empore SDB-XD disk, phenylarsonic acid on the middle activated-carbon disk and inorganic acid on the bottom Cation-SR disk loaded with Ca and Zr. The trapping flow rate was 15 mL min−1. Diphenylarsinic acid was eluted with 10 mL of ethanol containing 0.5 M ammonia, phenylarsonic acid with 20 mL 1.0 M ammonia and inorganic arsenic with 20 mL 6 M HCl. The ETAAS LOD for As of 0.13–0.16 μg L−1 was dependent on the enrichment factor. The spike recoveries ranged from 96.1 to 101.6% for a spike concentration of 10 μg L−1 which was chosen as it is the quality standard for drinking water in Japan. A simple DLLME method106 for the extraction of AsIII involved acidification of a 5 mL sample with 0.1 mL of 5 M HNO3 and rapid injection of a 400 μL aliquot of a methanolic solution of 0.1 mg L−1 APDC containing 50 μL of carbon tetrachloride. The organic phase was separated, evaporated to dryness at room temperature and redissolved into 100 μL of 0.1 M HNO3 for ICP-MS analysis using a 90 μL FI sample loop. The total As concentration was determined following reduction with 0.2 M sodium thiosulfate and the Asv concentration obtained from the difference between total As and AsIII concentrations. The method LOD was 0.0031 μg L−1 (AsIII) and the spike recoveries were in the range 94–106% for AsIII and 92–98% for AsV.

In a comparison of the micro-extraction techniques HF-LPME and DLLME for the determination of antimony species by TXRF,107 DLLME was preferred as sample extraction occurred within 5 minutes. A further advantage for DLLME was that up to 20 μL of extract could be deposited onto the preheated quartz sample carrier whereas HF-LPME was limited to 5 μL. The only disadvantage of DLLME was that it could accept no more than 5 mL of sample, compared to 25 mL possible for HF-LPME. The LODs of 1.1 and 0.09 μg L−1 for HP-LPME and DLLME, respectively were therefore very similar. Both methods gave good spike recoveries of 98–100% for SbIII and SbV from spiked mineral, sea and river waters.

For the speciation analysis of Cr in waters, a 30 μL microcolumn was packed108 with the nanomaterial Cs2.5H0.5PW12O40, which was synthesised by reacting sodium phosphotungstate (HNa2PW12O40) with caesium chloride. The polyoxoanion cluster nanostructure was specific for the retention of CrIII within a pH range 2 to 7. The stationary phase degraded above pH 8. The retained CrIII was eluted with 1 M HNO3. The ICP-MS LOD for CrIII was 0.3 μg L−1 for a 20 μL sample. Spike recoveries from tap water ranged from 101% (5 μg L−1 spike) to 96% (2.5 μg L−1 spike). There was no mention of the time required to clean the instrument before it could be used again for Cs or W determination. The analytical uncertainty budget for the HPLC-ICP-MS determination of CrIII and CrVI in water has been calculated109 using either a modelled approach i.e. bottom-up approach or by using analytical data obtained from method validation studies i.e. top-down approach. The calculated expanded uncertainties (k = 2) of the final results were 4.4% and 4.2% for CrIII and CrVI using the bottom-up approach against values of 7.8% and 7.9% determined using the top-down approach. The authors conclude that the former approach was useful in identifying sources of uncertainty in new methods but that all relevant components of the uncertainty may not have be taken into account. The latter approach using method validation data was advantageous in so far that data generated encompasses both trueness and precision components.

The use of two SCX guard columns in tandem provided a rapid method for the speciation analysis of Hg in seawater and marine fish.110 The advantage of using two 12.5 mm long guard columns was that complete separation of Hg2+, CH3Hg+, CH3CH2Hg+ and phenyl mercury could be obtained in less than 2.5 min. Using a mobile phase of 2.0 mM L-cysteine at pH 2.0 at a flow rate of 1.5 mL min−1 and a 5 μL sample loop for ICP-MS detection, LODs of the different species ranged from 0.019 μg L−1 (Hg2+) to 0.027 μg L−1 (CH3Hg+). The sum of the species concentrations measured for NRCCRM GBW (E) 080042 (seawater) agreed well with the certified total value of 1.02 ± 0.02 μg L−1. The recoveries for a 1.0 μg L−1 spike solution ranged from 101 to 96%. It should be noted that these spike levels were much higher than the concentrations found in real seawater samples and probably resulted in contamination of the instrument. The sensitivity problems highlighted in this paper mean that preconcentration is often required. A new DGT probe111 for the determination of MeHg in aquatic systems used agarose gel as the diffusive hydrogel and a 3-mercaptopropyl functionalised silica resin gel as the accumulation phase. The advantages of this probe were that the agarose gel had a low affinity for MeHg and that an acid extraction could be used for the accumulation resin meaning that ethylation of MeHg by tetraethylborate was possible for HS-GC-AFS detection. The fact that the diffusion coefficient for MeHg of 5.1 ± 0.20 × 10−6 cm2 s−1 in this probe was similar to that in seawater at 20 °C (5.0 × 10−6 cm2 s−1) meant that diffusion had not been affected. The utility of DGT devices is dependent on there being linear relationships between the amount of analyte (MeHg) accumulated, deployment time and gel thickness. These were all demonstrated for this device.

A rapid (<1.5 min) method112 for the determination of V species in water used RP ultra-HPLC both to separate vanadyl and vanadate ions and minimise the presence of chloride. Subsequently, SF-ICP-MS in medium resolution mode resolved the isobaric interference from residual ClO+. The method used a C18 column (1.7 μm particle size, 2.1 mm internal diameter × 50 mm long) with an aqueous mobile phase (0.6 mL min−1 flow rate, 20 μL loop) of 18 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM tetrabutylammonium hydroxide and 20 mM phosphoric acid. The LODs were 0.008 (vanadyl) and 0.013 (vanadate) μg L−1 with total peak area RSDs (n = 7) of 1.13 and 1.51%, respectively. Recoveries of a 5 μg L−1 spike were >95%.

The binding of trace elements to macromolecules is of importance as it largely determines the bioavailability of the element in the environment. A study113 to assess whether metals were bound to proteins in the same size fractions in both seawater and marine plankton used two-stage ultrafiltration, 2D PAGE separation and LA-ICP-MS analysis of the resulting gels. In seawater, Cd, Cr, Cu and Zn were associated with 5 protein fractions with similar molecular weights (10–14 kDa) but with isoelectric points that varied between 5.8 and 7.3. In contrast, in the plankton samples Cd was associated with proteins with different molecular weights (9, 13 and 22 kDa) and isoelectric points of 4.5, 5.2, 5.5 and 10, whereas Cr, Cu and Zn were bound to lower molecular weight fractions with variable isoelectric points. Tangential flow ultrafiltration combined with SEC and AEC was used to isolate marine DOM fractions,114 the metals associated with this material being identified by ICP-MS. The 3 and 10 kDa fractions contained Mn, Ni, Sr and Zn and eluted close to the SEC UV absorption maximum. Measured signals were significant only for Cu and Mo in the 3 kDa fraction. There were no signals for Al, As, Ba, Cd, Fe, Pb and V. Mass balance experiments showed that the percentages of metals bound to DOM were very low and ranged from 4.1 × 10−4% for Sr to 0.77% for Zn.

The increasing use of NPs and colloids means that they have become environmental species in their own right but their impact has yet to be determined. Following on-site filtration (<2.0 μm) of swimming pool water and dechlorination with sodium thiosulfate, a preparative-scale tangential-flow filtration system was used115 to fractionate Ti NPs into a “dissolved phase” (<1 kDa) and a concentrated microparticulate phase (1 kDa to 2.0 μm). The fractions were preserved by adding HNO3 to obtain a pH of <2 and 50 μL of HF was added prior to analysis by ICP-MS. Total Ti concentrations in swimming pool water varied between 21 to 60 μg L−1, the major part of which (82–98%) was found in the dissolved phase. The authors proposed sunscreen as the major source with the particulate phase being removed rapidly by the pool filtration system. The dissolved phase was particularly high in pools in which the filtration system was not back flushed regularly. Asymmetric flow FFF was coupled116 to ICP-MS, UV spectrometry and multi-angle light scattering to study Cu colloids in the runoff from vineyards. Under the optimum conditions of 5 μL injection volumes, a mobile phase of 1 × 10−3 M NH4NO3 at a main flow rate of 0.6 mL min−1 and a cross flow rate of 0.6 mL min−1 and a channel thickness of 250 μm, a LOD of 0.6 μg L−1 for Cu was achieved.

2.3 Instrumental analysis

2.3.1 Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Most of the innovation in the ICP-MS analysis of waters is in the sample introduction systems employed. The lanthanides were measured117 directly in Ca-rich waters using a commercially available system which featured a cyclonic spray chamber heated to 140 °C, a condenser at 2 °C and the option of adding a membrane desolvation unit to reduce oxide formation further. Use of this system increased sensitivity by 5–8 times compared to use of a Scott-type spray chamber and reduced the BaO+ interference from 0.10% to 0.005%. Use of the additional membrane system for a 10 ng g−1 solution eliminated BaO+ and reduced BaOH+ to 0.02%, thereby resulting in LODs of 30–500 fg g−1 for all analytes with a signal RSD of 10% at the 1 pg g−1 level. Analysis of two natural water reference materials LNEG SERMIN1 (low salt spring water) and LNEG VIDAC18 (sodium carbonate ground water) gave excellent agreement with previously published values. Dual-mode systems for simultaneously introducing both gas phase samples and nebulised aerosols into instruments have been reported many times for ICP-AES but rarely for ICP-MS. A dual inlet torch was used118 that could accept both aerosol and vapour streams simultaneously so that an internal standard could be used during CV-ICP-MS. However, this necessitated compromises in the gas flows such as an untypically low nebuliser gas flow of 0.4 L min−1 and a CV flow of 0.5 L min−1 to give an optimal total gas flow of 0.9 L min−1 to maximise the Hg intensity and minimise the CeO[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]Ce ratio to <2%. Using Bi, Pt and Tl as internal standards, this system adequately corrected for thermal drift over 100 minutes but suffered from a 35% reduction in the Hg signal compared to CV introduction alone. The dual mode LOD for Hg was 0.2 ng L−1 using external calibration and 0.09 ng L−1 with ID. The precision and accuracy were confirmed using the IRMM ERM-CA615 (groundwater) which has a certified value of 37 ± 4 ng L−1. Three replicate analyses without internal standard correction gave a result of 38.3 ± 0.5 ng L−1; internal standard correction gave a result of 38.2 ± 0.7 ng L−1 showing that dual mode did not improve the accuracy. The long term precision for a 10 ng L−1 solution (n = 5) was improved 3-fold to 3% by using Bi internal standardisation. Use of a low-uptake sample introduction system62 allowed Pb isotope ratios to be measured in very small samples such as freeze-dried Antarctic snow by quadrupole ICP-MS. By careful optimisation of the gas flows and the reaction cell conditions, it was possible to measure 208/207Pb and 206/207Pb with a SD of ±0.003 to 0.008 at Pb concentrations of 18 to 30 pg g−1 and with a sample uptake rate of 20 μL min−1.

Method development for isotopic analysis of waters continues to attract interest. The isotopic composition of dissolved Cu in seawater was determined119 by MC-ICP-MS after a series of preconcentration steps from 20 L of bulk seawater using a Nobias-chelate PA-1 column followed by an AG MP-1 anion-exchange column. The Nobias-chelate PA-1 resin has both imminodiacetic and ethylenediaminetriacetic acid functional groups so retains Cu at low pH but not the alkali and alkali earth elements. Good accuracy for the isotope measurements was demonstrated by spiking seawater with the NIST SRM 976 (Cu isotopic standard) and for concentration measurements by analysis of NRCC CRM CASS-5 and NASS-6 (seawaters). The isotopic analysis of the NRCC CRMs provided new δ65Cu data of 0.46 ± 0.006‰ (n = 3) and 0.40 ± 0.01‰ (n = 2), respectively. A very similar purification method120 was demonstrated to be suitable for the determination of the stable isotopes of Cd, Fe and Zn in seawater. The same chelating and anion exchange columns were used as in the previous paper but only 1 L of seawater was necessary. Double spike MC-ICP-MS had the advantage of correcting for instrumental bias and any fractionation in the separation procedure as well as allowing IDA of the sample. The 1σ internal precisions of 0.02–0.7‰, 0.01–0.2‰ and 0.01–0.2‰ for δ114Cd, δ56Fe and δ66Zn, respectively, were significantly lower than the expected variability in seawater of 2–3‰.

The feasibility of using ID-ICP-MS to determine Ca concentrations was demonstrated by the analysis of seawater.121 A 10 μL sample of seawater was spiked with 10 mg of a 10 μg g−1 43Ca solution and was then diluted to 2.5 g in 5% v/v HNO3. The samples were sonicated for 30 minutes and left overnight to ensure complete equilibration of the spike prior to ID-ICP-MS determination. The OSIL IAPSO (seawater) reference material was used as a bracketing standard to correct for mass discrimination and ratio drift every 5 samples. The accuracy, precision and reproducibility were evaluated by repeat analysis of the seawater standard. The ID-ICP-MS result of 10[thin space (1/6-em)]255 ± 10 μmol kg−1 (SD, n = 15, RSD = 0.1%) measured over a 4 month period was in good agreement with the standard EGTA titration method of 10[thin space (1/6-em)]260 ± 6 μmol kg−1. However, there seems little advantage in using the ID-ICP-MS method when the reduction in analytical time is only from 5 to 3 min and the titration method is more suitable for use on board ships. Although ICP-AES would be a more suitable technique for seawater analysis, the new method has greater potential for smaller samples such as foraminifera.

2.3.2 Vapour generation. The automation of hydride and cold vapour generation is still of interest. The miniaturisation achieved122 by using a lab-in-a-syringe for vapour generation followed by gas–liquid separation for the AAS determination of Hg gave reduced reagent consumption, good precision and a high sample throughput. The LOD was 0.03 μg L−1 for Hg in water for a 3 mL sample, the sample throughput 27 h−1 and the precision 3.1% (n = 10) at 2.0 μg L−1. The same research group also used the device for the determination of As in water.123 For a 3 mL sample and sampling frequency of 11 h−1, the LOD was 0.15 μg L−1 and the precision 3.2% (n = 10) at 2.0 μg L−1.

Selective HG for arsenic speciation is commonly used, often coupled with AAS methods. A sensitive method coupling cryotrapping and HG (ref. 124) to ICP-MS detection gave LODs ranging from 3.4 ng L−1 (total As) to 0.040 ng L−1 (methyl AsIII). The AsIII concentration was determined without reduction whereas the total As concentration was measured after reduction with L-cysteine. Methylated species were separated by thermal desorption after trapping of all hydrides at −196 °C on Chromosorb. The method gave good results for As species measured in the NRCC CRMs CASS-4 and CASS-5 (near shore seawaters), NASS-5 (seawater) and SLRS-4 and -5 (river waters).

Multielemental vapour generation methods seem to be moving away from finding compromise conditions for simultaneous measurement towards fast sequential analysis in which the elements are trapped on microcolumns in complex injection manifolds and then eluted and detected sequentially. One such method for Cd, Hg and Pb (ref. 125) in sea and lake waters used two chelating columns packed with the chelate 1,5-bis(di-2-pyridyl)methylene thiocarbazide immobilised on silica gel. For test samples, the LODs were 0.031 (Pb) to 0.064 Cd μg L−1, enrichment factors 16.4 (Pb) to 27.3 (Hg) and precisions (n = 9) 2.5% (Pb) to 2.9% (Hg) at a concentration of 0.5 μg L−1. Results for the NWRI CRMs TMDA-54.4 (fortified lake water), LG6016 (estuarine water) and NRCC CASS-5 (near shore seawater) were in good agreement with the certified values. Recoveries from spiked seawater samples from Malaga Bay were 94% (Cd) to 108% (Pb).

2.3.3 X-ray spectrometry. A review of trace and ultratrace analysis of liquid samples by XRF126 (67 references) covered micro-extraction procedures, nanomaterials, filters and activated thin layers using various types of instrumentation ranging from large scale to hand held systems.

In the determination of halides by TXRF,127 losses during the drying phase were reduced through the use of halide potassium salts dissolved in an aqueous solution of the tetraamine copper(II) nitrate complex Cu(NH3)4(NO3)2 which resulted in improved recoveries and RSDs for the standards over a concentration range of 1 to 200 mg L−1. It was noted that Br and Cl recoveries were between 98–123% for standards ≥10 mg L−1; below this concentration the recoveries were significantly higher than 100% suggesting possible spectral or contamination problems. The authors reported LODs of 0.002 mg L−1 for Br and 1 mg L−1 for Cl.

2.3.4 Plasma-cavity ringdown spectrometry. The progress of plasma-cavity ringdown spectrometry as an atomic spectrometry technique was reviewed128 (91 references). Cavity ringdown spectrometry is an absorption method, but unlike AAS and UV-Vis it possesses the capacity for absolute measurement and the detection of very weak absorption coefficients due to its extremely long path length. Initially ICPs were used as the plasma source, but MIPs are now preferred due to their lower gas flows and their ability to form tubular plasma discharges which are more suitable for use with a collimated light source such as a laser.

3 Analysis of soils, plants and related materials

3.1 Review papers

In a review144 (84 references) on the advantages and limitations of different approaches for imaging element distribution and speciation in plant cells, future trends and challenges – notably the need to improve spatial resolution – were identified and discussed.

Reviews of analytical methods for the determination of specific analytes included two articles on the determination of Hg in environmental samples. The first145 (144 references) covered articles published in 2010–2011 and the second146 was an update featuring 35 references from 2012. Approaches for the determination of As species were discussed by Rajakovic et al.147 (110 references) with particular emphasis on factors that affected analyte stability during sample collection, storage, preservation and extraction. A detailed evaluation148 (206 references) of methods for the determination of halogens in biological samples, including plants, featured AAS, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, NAA and XRF spectrometry. A useful summary of biological CRMs with certified halogen concentrations was also provided. Analytical techniques for the measurement of the long-lived radionuclide 129I were summarised149 (84 references) and compared critically.

The contribution of atomic spectrometry to radiation protection was highlighted in a review14 by Zheng et al. (292 references). The article included comparative assessment of analytical techniques; a historical review of radio-ecological applications from the 1940s to the Fukushima Daichi accident; and a critical summary of the current state-of-the-art and future research needs.

A book chapter150 (142 references) in Elsevier's Advances in Agronomy series provided a useful overview of the use of nanoSIMS to investigate soil processes.

3.2 Sample preparation

3.2.1 Sample dissolution and extraction. A review of sample preparation for arsenic speciation in terrestrial plants151 (103 references) highlighted the need to minimise the time between extraction and analysis to avoid species interconversion. Another152 (51 references) compared strategies for preparation of tea for multi-elemental analysis.

Numerous comparisons of sample digestion protocols were published but the maturity of the field meant that findings could sometimes be anticipated. For example, Chand and Prasad153 compared microwave-assisted aqua regia digestion and alkaline fusion for the determination of Al, As, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn in marine sediments by ICP-AES. Unsurprisingly, volatile As was lost in the fusion process but retained in the closed vessels used in the microwave process, whereas the recovery of Al – an element likely to be associated to a significant extent with refractory silicates accessible only to HF – was lower with the pseudo total digestion. Other workers154 reported that, as expected, recoveries of Cd, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn from Brazilian soils generally decreased in the order: USEPA Method 3052 (closed vessel microwave assisted digestion with HNO3 and HF); Method 3051A (closed vessel microwave assisted digestion with HNO3 and HCl); Method 3050B (open vessel digestion with HNO3, H2O2 and HCl). A more novel study was a comparison155 of six procedures for extracting AsIII, AsV, DMA and MMA from plants for analysis by HPLC-ICP-MS. These procedures were: 2% v/v HNO3 at 90 °C (90 min); 2% v/v HNO3 at 37 °C (90 min); water at 37 °C (16 h) followed by sonication at room temperature (20 min); water with microwave-assistance (80 °C); 1 + 1 water–methanol at 37 °C (16 h) followed by sonication at room temperature (20 min); and 1 + 3 water–methanol at 37 °C (16 h) followed by sonication at room temperature (20 min). The first method gave highest recoveries (ca. 90%) but with some interconversion of AsIII to AsV.

Improvements in sample digestion apparatus included an easily automated closed-vessel conductively heated system156 that, under optimised conditions (200 mg powdered plant sample + 1.5 mL HNO3 + 1.4 mL 30% H2O2) could process 38 samples in 80 min. Results were similar to those obtained by microwave-assisted digestion for a variety of plant materials. Recoveries for five NIST plant SRMs were 75–114% of certified values. A novel sample digestion device157 focussed short-wavelength IR radiation directly onto soil samples held in a customised quartz vessel. Recoveries of 11 elements from SCP EnviroMAT SS-1 (soil standard) measured by ICP-AES were in the range 91–108%, with RSDs 0.7–3.6% (n = 4).

Amongst the developments involving microwaves was the extension of a microwave-induced combustion method,158 previously demonstrated for the determination of Hg, to the measurement of As, Cd and Pb in soils. Samples (300 mg) were mixed with 300 mg microcrystalline cellulose, pressed into pellets and combusted in O2 (20 bar) in closed quartz vessels. Volatilised analytes were trapped in 2 M HNO3 + 2 M HCl (6 mL) for analysis by ICP-MS or ICP-AES. Results were in agreement with certified values for NIST SRM 2709 (San Joaquin soil) and NWRI CRM SUD-1 (Sudbury sediment). A microwave-assisted micellar extraction method159 used the biodegradable surfactants SDS and Triton X-100 to isolate Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni and Pb from Posidonia oceanica (seagrass) for ETAAS analysis. A miniaturised microwave-assisted EDTA extraction method160 for grassland plants gave results similar to macro-scale HNO3 digestion for the measurement of Cd, Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn by ICP-AES.

In the field of ultrasound-assisted extraction, researchers in Vigo161 used a high intensity ultrasonic probe (50 W) and cup-horn sonoreactor (200 W) to reduce the time required to perform soil extractions. The conventional BCR 1 h EDTA extraction could be completed in 2 min with the probe or 10 min with the sonoreactor and the 16 h acetic acid extraction in 6 min with the probe or 30 min with the sonoreactor. Other workers162 recommended using a vacuum pump to generate bubbles, thereby improving contact between sample and extractant to reduce extraction time from 2 h to only 2 min for the ultrasound-assisted HCl extraction of Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb and Zn from soil. Focussed sonication163 at 500 W in 1% formic acid in an ice bath extracted As from kelp in just 30 s. The recovery was 95% of that obtained by microwave-assisted HNO3 digestion. Although recovery from cultures of Chlorella vulgaris (a single-cell green algae) was lower (71%), the rapidity of the procedure allowed the detection of unstable As phytochelatin and glutathione species in algal cells that had been exposed to AsIII solution. These As species were not found in cultures exposed to AsV thereby providing a new insight into As metabolism.

Single-step soil extraction methods have been refined to yield improved information on potential trace element mobility and toxicity. Reis et al.164 showed that the soil–water ratio did not affect the recovery of water-soluble Hg in the range studied (1.5[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]100 to 20[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]100). However, it took 24 hours for the extraction to reach equilibrium, considerably longer than is recommended in most extraction protocols in the literature. After comparing numerous reagents for measurement of absorbed B in soils, Goldberg and Suarez165 selected 0.2 M sorbitol as the most efficient and recommended a 24 hour extraction at a suspension density of 100 g L−1. After using SSIDMS to study species interconversion during extraction of exchangeable CrVI from soil, Zuliani et al.166 chose ultrasound-assisted extraction in 0.1 M K2HPO4 to minimise the effects. Five consecutive 30 min extractions were required for quantitative analyte recovery.

Pyrophosphate was selected over NaCl and NaHCO3 as the optimal extractant for the study of iron (hydr)oxide nanoparticles in soil by asymmetric FFF-HR-ICP-MS.167 Its superior performance was attributed to its ability to disaggregate organo-mineral assemblages.

A paper168 describing a fractionation scheme involving parallel extractions to identify forms of Mn in spinach leaves was soon followed by a similar paper169 by the same authors on the speciation of Cu. In both cases 0.01 g freeze-dried samples were treated with water, acetone, chloroform, diethyl ether, ethanol, n-hexane and methanol, with analyte determination by ICP-MS.

Interest has continued in sequential extraction schemes. Undeterred by the fact that sequential extraction is an operationally defined approach and so established protocols should be applied exactly as prescribed, workers have applied ultrasound-assisted ‘variants’ on the BCR scheme to soil,170 sediment171 and even herbal tea!172 A ten-step sequential extraction173 was proposed for As fractionation in sediments that could differentiate some of the species grouped together in the residual fraction by other procedures. The use of Cl-containing reagents was avoided to reduce polyatomic ion interference in ICP-MS. The development of the first dedicated sequential extraction procedure174 for fractionation of Si in soil was based on study of specific minerals and well-characterised soil samples. The reagents selected were: CaCl2 (step 1); acetic acid (step 2); H2O2 at 85 °C (step 3); and ammonium oxalate under UV light (step 4). Test portions were then subjected either to bio-opal separation with sodium polytungstate followed by extraction with NaOH (step 5) and finally a lithium-based fusion (step 7); or to extraction with NaOH without bio-opal separation (step 6). Sequential extraction procedures are often criticised for being lengthy, but the 1 week NaOH extraction recommended here must surely be a record! A new scheme175 for sequential extraction of carboplatin, cisplatin and inorganic PtVI in soil followed by CPE and CS-ETAAS potentially allowed inputs from catalytical converter emissions and cancer hospital wastes to be distinguished.

3.2.2 Preconcentration procedures. Authoritative reviews have been published covering recent developments in liquid phase micro-extraction176 with emphasis on SDME, HF-LPME and DLLME; and in the use of microbacteria102 as sorbents for SPE.

Numerous preconcentration procedures for specific analytes continue to be reported. Methods for the analysis of soils, plants or related materials, or those developed for other sample matrices that used soil or plant CRMs for validation, are summarised in Tables 3–5.

Table 3 Preconcentration methods involving liquid-phase micro-extraction used in the analysis of soils, plants and related materials
Analyte(s) Matrix Method Reagent(s) Detector Figures of merit (LOD μg L−1 unless otherwise stated) Method validation References
a SbIII determined, then reduction, determination of total Sb, and estimation of SbV by difference.
B Plant, water HS-LPMS NaOH ICP-AES 8.0 140
Bi, In, Pb Plant USAEME Calix{4}pyrrole + tetrachloroethylene ICP-AES 0.57 for Bi, 0.76 for In, 0.84 for Pb 177
Cd Hair, vegetables IL-UA-DMME 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate extraction of Cd-4-(2-thiazolylazo)-resorcinol complex then MNP FAAS 0.40 NWRI TMDA-54 (fortified lake water), SPS-WW2 (waste water), NIST SRM 1570a (spinach leaves) 178
Cu Cereals, vegetables DLLME 2,9-Dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline, N-phenylbenzimidoyl thiourea FAAS 0.05 NCS ZC85006 (tomato) 179
Cu Water IL-DLLME 1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium bis((trifluoromethyl) sulfonyl)imide ETAAS 0.004 NIST SRM 2709 (san Joaquin soil), NBS SRM 2701 (Buffalo river sediment), NRCC DOLT-2 (dogfish liver), NIST SRM 1643e (trace element in water) 180
Cu Plant, soil, water DLLME 4-Phenyl-3-thiosemicarbazide FAAS 0.69 HPS QCS-19 (high purity standard), LGC 6156 (harbour sediment), NIST SRM 1572 (citrus leaves) 181
Mo Corn VAE-SFODME 8-Hydroxyquinoline + 1-undecanol FAAS 4.9 NIST SRM 1568a (rice flour), IRMM BCR 679 (white cabbage) 182
Pb Hair, plants, water IL-DMME 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate extraction of Pb-pyrrolidine-dithiocarbamate then MNPs FAAS 0.57 NCS ZC 81002b (human hair), NWRI TMDA-54.4 (water), TMDA-70 (Ontario lake water), TMDA-64.2 (water), SPS-WW2 (waste water) 183
Pu Sediment, soil, synthetic urine, water CPE P,P′-Di(2-ethylhexyl) methanediphosphonic acid ICP-MS (or α-spectrometry) 15–200 pg L−1 IAEA-384 (lagoon sediment) and spike recovery 184
REEs Water SFODME 1-(2-Pyridylazo)-2-naphthol ETV-ICP-MS 0.65–2.1 ng L−1 NRCCRM GBW 07603 (branch and leaf), NRCCRM GBW 07601 (human hair) 185
REEs Sediment, water SPE + DLLME Chelex 100 (SPE sorbent) then 1-phenyl-3-methyl-4-benzoylpyrazolone + tris (DLLME reagents) ETV-ICP-MS 0.003–0.073 ng L−1 NRCCRM GBW 07301a (stream sediment) 186
Sb Soil, water USE-SFODME Sodium diethyldithiocarbamate + 1-undecanola ETAAS 0.01 IERM GSB 07-1376-2001, NRCCRM GBW 07441 187
Se Rice CPE Cyclohexane ETAAS 0.08 NRCCRM GBW 08502 (rice meal) 188
Ti Plants, water CPE Morin (2′,3,4′,5,7-pentahydroxyflavone) + triton X-114 FAAS 2.9 189
Zr Soil, water DLLME 2-(5-Bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-diethylaminophenol FAAS 44 Spike recovery 190


Table 4 Preconcentration methods involving coprecipitation used in the analysis of soils, plants and related materials
Analyte(s) Matrix Carrier Detector Figures of merit (LOD μg L−1 unless otherwise stated) Method validation References
Au Anodic slime, ore, soil, water N-Benzyl-2-(3-methyl-4-(2-morpholine-4-ylethyl)-5-oxo)-4,5-acetylhydrazinecarboxamide FAAS 0.36 pg L−1 Spike recovery 191
Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn Fruit, vegetables Lanthanum 8-hydroxyquinoline ICP-AES 0.31–3.2 NCS ZC 85006 (tomato) 192
Co, Cu, Ni Pepper, peppermint, water 2-(4-(2-(1H-Indol-3-yl)ethyl)-3-(4-methylbenzyl)-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)-N′-(pyridine-2-yl methylidene)acetohydrazide FAAS 0.40 for Co, 0.16 for Cu, 0.17 for Ni HPS CRM-SA-C Sandy soil C 193


Table 5 Preconcentration methods involving solid phase extraction used in the analysis of soils, plants and related materials
Analyte(s) Matrix Substrate Substrate coating or modifying agents Detector Figures of merit (LOD μg L−1 unless otherwise stated) Method validation References
a CrIII determined, then reduction, determination of total Cr, and estimation of CrVI by difference.
Ag Biological samples Titanium dioxide nanotubes None ICP-MS 0.021 NRCCRM GBW 07604 (poplar leaves) 194
Ag, Cd, Cu, Hg, Pb Rice, tea, tuna MNPs 3-(Trimethoxysilyl)-1-propanethiol modified with ethylene glycol bis-mercaptoacetate ICP-AES except CV-AAS for Hg 0.01–0.09 Spike recovery 195
Al, Pb Various vegetables Amberlite XAD-4 Agaricus arvensis ICP-AES 0.03 for Al, 0.10 for Pb NRCCRM GBW 07604 (poplar leaves) 196
Au Anodic slime, ore, soil, water Amberlite XAD-4 Sorbed as the AuIII-2-pyridin-5-(4-tolyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole FAAS 1.03 Spike recovery 197
Au, Pd Fish, shrimp, soil, water MWCNTs Polypropylene amine dendrimers FAAS 0.08 for Au, 0.12 for Pd NCS DC 73323 (soil) 198
Bi Plant, water BiIII ion imprinted polymer Prepared by formation of 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-diethylaminophenol complex ETAAS 0.0086 199
Cd Blood, cigarettes, soil Alumina Sodium dodecylsulfate modified with dithizone FAAS 3 Spike recovery 200
Cd Herbs, rice, water MWCNTs Diphenylcarbazide FAAS 0.05 NCS DC 73323 (soil) 201
Cd Water Polyurethane foam Procaine hydrochloride ICP-AES 0.01 IAEA soil-7, NWRI CRM-TMDW (drinking water) 202
Cd Soil, water MNPs Coated with silica then functionalised with amine then Schiff's base FAAS 0.11 Spike recovery 203
Cd, Ni, Pb Fish, sediment, soil, water MWCNTs 8-Aminoquinoline FAAS 0.09 for Cd, 0.72 for Ni, 1.0 for Pb CANMET LKSD-4 (lake sediment) 204
Cd, Ni, Pb, Zn Fish, sediment, soil, water Magnetic metal–organic framework Prepared from dithizone-modified MNP and a Cu-(benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate) metal–organic framework FAAS 0.12–1.2 CANMET LKSD-4 (lake sediment) 205
Cd, Pb Soil, water MNPs Triton X-114 FAAS 0.15 for Cd, 0.74 for Pb NRCCRM GBW 07425 (soil), NWRI TMDA 53.3 (fortified water) 206
Co, Cu, Ni Plants, water MNPs None FAAS 0.9 for Co, 0.3 for Cu, 0.7 for Ni NIES no.1 (pepperbush), NIES no. 7 (tea leaves) 207
Cr Soil, water MNPs Alumina modified with triton X-114. Sorbed as the CrIII-1-(2-pyridilazo)-2-naphtol complexa FAAS 1.4–3.6 Spike recovery 208
Cr Tea leaves Titanium dioxide nanotubes Nonea ICP-MS 0.0075 NRCCRM GBW 07605 (tea leaves) 209
Cu, Fe, Mn Parsley, spinach, water Polyurethane foam Dithiocarbamate FAAS Spike recovery 210
Cu, Fe, Pb Kiwi, water, wheat Graphene-based cobalt nanocomposite None FAAS 0.81 NIST RM 8704 (Buffalo river sediment), SRM 1568a (rice flower), SPS-WW1 batch 111 (wastewater) 211
Cu, Fe, Pb Fertiliser, water MWCNTs Sorbed as the pyrocatechol violet chelates FAAS NIST SRM 1570a (spinach leaves), NWRI TMDA 70 (fortified lake water) 212
Cu, Pb Food, water Polyhydoxybutyrate-b-polydimethylsiloxane copolymer Sorbed as the sudan III chelates FAAS NWRI TMDA 54.4 (fortified lake water), NIST SRM 1515 (apple leaves) 213
Cu, Pb Baby food, coffee, tea, water Polyhydoxybutyrate-b-polyethyleneglycol None FAAS 0.32 for Cu, 1.82 for Pb NIST SRM 1515 (apple leaves), IAEA 336 (lichen), NRCCRM GBW 07675 (tea) 214
Hg Soil PTFE tube Ionic liquid methyltrioctylammonium thiosalicylate CVAAS 0.04 NIST SRM 2709 (san Joaquin soil), NIST SRM 2711 (Montana soil), SRM 2704 (Buffalo river sediment) 215
Mn Food, sediment, water Poly(protoporphyrin-co-vinylpyridine) None FAAS 0.34 216
Ni Peas, soil, water Walnut sawdust microparticles SDS coating modified with dimethylglyoxim FAAS 0.55 NWRI CRM TMDW-500 (drinking water) 217
Ni Effluent, soil, textile Alumina SDS coating modified with dithizone FAAS 0.54 Spiked recovery 218
Ni, Pb Water Polystyrene-graphed-ethylmethacrylate copolymer resin None FAAS 0.92 for Ni, 1.44 for Pb NRCCRM GBW 08301 (river sediment) 219
Pb Barley, cauliflower, street sediment, tobacco, water Ultra layered cobalt oxide None FAAS 0.72 NIST RM 8704 (Buffalo river sediment), IRMM BCR 482 (lichen), SPS-WW1 batch 111 (waste water) 220
Pb Water Expanded polystyrene foam waste N,N-Alpha-benzoin oxime FAAS 0.033 IRMM BCR 403 (seawater), IRMM BCR 715 (waste water), NCS DC-78302 (Tibet soil) 221
Pd Tea leaves, water Nanoclay 5-(4-Dimethylaminobenzylidene)rhodanine ETAAS 0.0026 NIST SRM 2556 (used auto catalyst) 222
Pd Soil, water MWCNTs 1-Butyl 3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate FAAS 0.41 223
REE Water Titanium dioxide nanotube None ICP-MS 0.19–1.2 ng L−1 NRCCRM GBW 07605 (tea leaves) 224
REE Tea leaves, water Fe2O3@SiO2@polyaniline–graphene oxide composite None ICP-MS 0.004–1.5 ng L−1 NRCCRM GBW 07605 (tea leaves) 225
V Chicken, coffee, fruit, tea, vegetables MWCNTs Sorbed as the 8-hydroxyquinoline chelate ETAAS 0.012 NIST SRM 1515 (apple leaves), SRM 1570a (spinach leaves), NRCCRM GBW 07605 (tea leaves) 226
Zn Water Ion imprinted poly(vinylimidazole) None FAAS 1.5 NIST SRM 1515 (apple leaves), SRM 1570a (spinach leaves) 227


3.3 Instrumental analysis

3.3.1 Atomic absorption spectrometry. Two new methods based on thermospray flame furnace AAS have been described. The fast sequential approach of Miranda and Pereira-Filho228 accurately quantified Cd, Cu and Pb in leaf slurries in just 69 s (23 s per analyte) with LODs of 0.05, 2.1 and 0.68 mg kg−1, respectively. Galazzi and Arrida229 claimed the first determination of Sn by HG-MF-AAS, a variant on TS-FF-AAS in which analyte hydrides are introduced by means of a ceramic tube to a metallic furnace (with holes on the underside to allow partial flame penetration) mounted on the burner of a FAAS instrument. The LOD of the optimised method was 7.1 μg L−1. Excellent accuracy (recoveries 101–104% of expected concentrations) was obtained for analysis of NIST SRM 1643e (trace element in water) but recovery of Sn from NRCC PACS-2 (marine sediment) proved variable (76–121%).

A review230 (89 references) of permanent chemical modifiers in ETAAS included information on reagents applicable in the analysis of organic solutions, suspensions and solid samples, acid digests and waters. A slurry sampling method231 in which the graphite tube was modified with 0.3 μg Ir + 0.04 μg Nb allowed determination of V in soil and sediments without interference effects, as demonstrated by the successful analysis of four CRMs.

High speed self-reversal background correction 232 was effective for the removal of spectral interference from Fe in the ETAAS determination of Cd in soil extracts. Use of a high-intensity boosted-discharge HCL modulated at 100 Hz eliminated the influence of emission noise. Accurate analyte measurements were obtained at Fe/Cd ratios of 100[thin space (1/6-em)]000 in 0.11 M acetic acid and of 10[thin space (1/6-em)]000 in 0.5 M hydroxylammonium chloride.

Reports of analytical methods based on HR-CS-AAS have become more numerous as the technique has gained acceptance and become more widely available. Cadmium, Cu, Ni and Pb (ref. 233) were determined by HR-CS-ETAAS in acid digests of black tea from Saudi Arabia. Slurry sample introduction234 proved successful in the measurement of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn and Pb by HR-CS-ETAAS in NIST SRMs 1570 (spinach leaves) and 1573 (tomato leaves) and in multivitamin dietary supplements from Poland. Direct solid sample introduction HR-CS-ETAAS was used to measure Fe and Ni in plants and lichens from Spain;235 Sb and Mo in dust from Egypt;44 and Se in soils from Brazil.236 A CVG-HR-CS-AAS method237 with quartz tube atomisation for the determination of Au had a LOD of 2.6 ng mL−1 and was successfully applied to alloy, soil and water samples.

Also gaining wider acceptance is the use of commercial total Hg analysers for the speciation of Hg in solid samples by TD-AAS. The desorption temperature profiles of inorganic Hg compounds – Hg0, HgCl2, HgO, HgSO4, humic-bound Hg and HgS – were used238 to study interactions between Hg species and soil. Organic-Hg was determined239 by TD-AAS following digestion of 0.5 g soil samples in 5 mL of 0.3 M CuBr2 solution in 5% v/v HCl and selective extraction into 10 mL DCM.

A deep-UV LED photoreactor was evaluated by Sturgeon and Luong240 for the reduction of inorganic and MeHg prior to their determination by PVG-AAS. The device contained a set of 0.3 mW UV LEDs (245–260 nm peak output) and the reaction was carried out in 2% formic acid. Performance was compared with that obtained using a set of 0.3 mW 360 nm output LEDs, and with that of a thermal reactor at 85 °C to assess the effects of wavelength and temperature. Because room temperature irradiation at 350 nm produced no signal, the authors suggested that previous studies at this wavelength which detected a response may have been influenced by unnoticed thermal effects. A 9 min irradiation period quantitatively reduced both Hg species. The LOD of 0.68 ng was similar to that obtained by CV-AAS. A blank-corrected total Hg concentration of 3.12 ± 0.15 mg kg−1 was obtained for NRCC PACS-2 (marine sediment), the certified value of which is 3.02 ± 0.02 mg kg−1. Unfortunately, no irradiation conditions could be found that yielded selective response from individual Hg species.

3.3.2 Atomic emission spectrometry. Various spectral lines of Ar, Ga, In and Y were evaluated241 as internal standards for the axially viewed ICP-AES determination of Ba, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, Sr, V and Zn in plant digests, using NIST SRM 1575 (tomato leaves) as a test sample. Analyte recoveries without internal standard were often <50% of certified values but accurate results could be obtained for Cd and Pb using In (at 230.606 nm) and for the other analytes using Y (371.029 nm) or Ga (417.206 nm) as internal standards. Use of Ar spectral lines proved to be ineffective.

Addition of 0.15% cetyltrimethylammoniumchloride surfactant resulted in an enhanced signal intensity in the determination of Cd, Cr, Hg and Pb by solution cathode-GD-AES,242 and improved LODs to 1, 42, 7 and 2 μg L−1, respectively. Results for stream sediment CRMs NRCCRM GBW 07310 and 07[thin space (1/6-em)]311 were close to target values, except for Hg for which concentrations fell below the LOD.

A solid sampling ETV-ICP-AES method for the measurement of Pt, Pd and Rh in Brassica Napus (rapeseed)243 gave LODs of 0.38, 0.14 and 0.15 μg g−1, respectively, and RSDs of 4.7–7.1% (n = 7) for a sample mass of 5 mg. Calibration with aqueous standards dried onto paper filter strips overcame the memory effects observed for Pt when liquid standards were introduced to the furnace.

New methods for Hg determination by CV-AES included a rapid CV-ICP-AES procedure244 for plants and soils with a LOD of 3 μg kg−1 and a miniaturised (micro-torch) CV-CCP-AES approach245 for soils with a LOD of 4.8 μg kg−1. The latter procedure gave good agreement with certified values for measurement of Hg in six soil and sediment CRMs. Application of the Bland and Altman test to 31 soils from an industrial town in NW Romania showed no significant statistical difference at the 95% confidence interval between results of the proposed method and those obtained using CV-AFS.

3.3.3 Atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Researchers in China246 reported (in Chinese) an optimised method for determination of methylmercury in soil by purge-and-trap GC-AFS that yielded a recovery of 104 ± 15% when applied to IRMM ERM-CC580 (estuarine sediment) and a LOD of 0.8 μg kg−1. Other workers247 preferred a headspace trap GC-AFS approach. They obtained results in good agreement with certified values for analysis of CRMs IAEA-405 (estuarine sediment) and IAEA-433 (marine sediment).

In the determination of arsenic in soil by HG-AFS, online multichannel ultrasonic extraction with sequential injection slurry sampling248 enhanced sample throughput, reduced sample and reagent consumption and minimised potential contamination and analyte loss. A 20 min sonication was used to extract As from 1.0 mL of aqueous sample slurry mixed with 1.5 mL of 6 M HCl. The mixture was then flushed into a pre-reduction reactor where the AsV species were converted to the AsIII species using 1% m/v thiourea and 0.5% m/v ascorbic acid. Finally AsH3 was generated using 2.0% KBH4 and flushed to a gas–liquid separator. The LODs were in the range 30–70 μg kg−1 and the RSDs < 2.0% (n = 6).

3.3.4 Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The high sensitivity of SF-ICP-MS was key in the development of a method249 for measurement of Te in plants and soil without analyte preconcentration. Using a conical concentric nebuliser with sample uptake rate of 0.1 mL min−1, the LODs were 0.17 and 0.02 μg kg−1 for soil and plant samples, respectively.

The accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in March 2011 provided considerable impetus for analytical method development. Ohno et al.52 successfully used a triple quadrupole ICP-MS instrument to measure 129I in soil. In previous studies that used O2 to overcome the interference from 129Xe+ (an impurity in Ar plasma gas), the formation of 127IH2+ from 127I+ in the reaction cell limited the LOD achievable. With the new instrument, most 127I+ ions were excluded from entering the reaction cell by the first quadrupole and residual interference could be corrected by subtraction, assuming a production ratio in the plasma of 5 × 10−9 for (127IH2+ + 127ID+)/127I+. The results were consistent with those obtained by AMS, even for soils with 129I activities as low as 2 mBq kg−1. Zheng et al.,250 who used the same type of instrument with N2O as the reaction cell gas to measure 135Cs/137Cs isotope ratios in forest litter, lichen and soil, concluded that the radiocaesium had been mainly released from the Unit 2 reactor. In contrast, Takagi et al.251 specifically opted for quadrupole ICP-MS for measurement of 90Sr in soil in order to ensure that the method was widely accessible. Online chelate column separation was used to preconcentrate Sr from soil digests. The use of ultrapure oxygen as the reaction gas in the DRC overcame isobaric interference from 90Zr. The LOD of 3.9 Bq kg−1 was sufficient to measure 90Sr in samples collected up to 20 km from the power plant.

Isotope ratio measurement methods were reported for Pb (ref. 62) in various matrices including sediment by quadrupole ICP-MS; for Os (ref. 252) in biological samples by SF-ICP-MS; and for Se (ref. 253) in soils by HPLC-ICP-MS.

Use of ultrasonic slurry sampling obviates the need for sample digestion and is suitable for use with ETV-ICP-MS. A procedure54 for determination of Au, Pd, Pt and Rh involved sonicating samples of road dust with APDC to produce a mixture containing 0.5% m/v dust and 2% m/v of the chemical modifier. Analysis by standard additions gave results similar to certified values for Pd, Pt and Rh in IRMM BCR 723 (road dust) with LODs of 0.4 to 0.9 μg kg−1. A method254 which used 1% m/v 8-hydroxyquinoline as chemical modifier in the determination of As, Cd, Hg and Pb in herbs achieved LODs of 0.1–0.3 μg kg−1.

Applications of LA-ICP-MS to geological samples such as rocks and soils have been reviewed255 (179 references). An innovative (and thrifty) approach256 to obtain information on sources of Pu in the environment involved measurement of 239Pu/240Pu ratios in archived α-spectrometry sources that had been prepared from Russian sediment samples in the mid-1990s. Low S/N proved to be a limitation, but it was still possible to distinguish between weapons-grade, civilian grade and global fallout Pu.

Efforts continue to improve the homogeneity of targets used in LA-ICP-MS because this is key to accurate quantification. Malherbe et al.257 mixed powdered samples of soil and sediment SRMs with lithium borate, added isotopically enriched spike solutions and then fused the mixtures into glass before measuring Ba, Cr, Pb, Sr and Zn by ID-MS. Fusion led to a more homogeneous distribution of elements than possible with traditional pelletisation and the dilution of the sample in the flux gave a relatively standard target matrix for ablation. Horner and Beachemin258 compared silicon- and zirconium-based xerogels containing 8-hydroxyquinoline complexes of analytes as standards for soil analysis by LA-ICP-MS. Zirconium-based gels were preferred because they were more homogeneous, gave slightly more accurate results for analysis of NIST SRM 2711 (Montana soil) and SCP EnviroMAT SS-2 (soil standard) and were easier to form into pellets.

A useful development for LA-ICP-MS analysis of plants was a new Peltier-cooled LA cell259 that measured the sample temperature directly, allowing faster mitigation of thermal effects caused by the laser and thus ensuring thermal stability of the sample during ablation. The cell was successfully used in the elemental mapping of Cu and I in fresh leaves of Solanum lycopersicum (tomato plant). In contrast, mapping260 of Hg in root cross sections of Zea mays (maize) initially proved problematic due to memory effects caused by sorption of the analyte inside the ablation chamber. These effects were overcome by performing spot analysis using a 10 s delay and washout between spots.

The development and use of hyphenated techniques with chromatographic or electrophoretic separation coupled to ICP-MS is now widespread. Recent examples included a species-specific ID-GC-ICP-MS method261 for the determination of MeHg in water, sediments and biological tissue; a procedure262 for speciation of Zn in plants that used SEC-ICP-MS and IC-ICP-MS in sequence; and a CE-ICP-MS instrument263 for As speciation in water, plants and animal tissue that had a novel high-efficiency sprayer interface adapted from CE-ESI-MS. Speciation methods based on HPLC-ICP-MS were reported for P in transgenic plants,264 for Sb in soil265 and for Se in Brassica chinensis (pakchoi).266

3.3.5 Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. A detailed and authoritative review267 (216 references) described the fundamental principles and attributes of LIBS and provided a comprehensive overview of applications to natural materials, including soils and sediments. Khater268 included soil in his review (98 references) of the use of LIBS to determine the elements B, Be, C, Cl, F, Li, P and S. The technique was also the subject of a review269 (100 references) of potential applications concerning the determination of glycemic elements in medicinal plants.

Improvements in LIBS for the analysis of soil included the addition of a planar mirror270 positioned vertically on the sample surface 10 mm from the plasma axis. This increased the signals obtained for Al, Ba, Fe and Mg from NRCCRM GBW 07411 (Chinese soil) approximately two-fold and improved S/N. Matrix effects in the determination of Cd were reduced271 through use of a combined calibration curve derived from the individual calibrations for neutral and singly ionised species. New criteria,272 proposed for selection of a suitable reference line to serve as internal standard in LIBS analysis, were based on correlation criteria rather than similarity in excitation potentials between analytical and reference line. The measurement of Pb in soils was given as an example. Kriging interpolation273 and use of a database of spectra from nine spiked artificial soils containing different proportions of sand, kaolin and goethite showed promise for the quantitative determination of Zn.

The application of chemometrics to whole LIBS spectra, or selected wavelength regions thereof, is becoming a powerful tool for sample classification. Mukhono et al.274 showed that PCA and SIMCA could distinguish soil and rocks derived from: high background radiation areas with geothermal influence; high background radiation areas without geothermal influence; and normal background radiation areas with geothermal influence. Researchers based in Korea275 used PCA to categorise soil as either contaminated with metals, contaminated with oil or clean. Meanwhile, two groups in the USA276,277 demonstrated the utility of PLS for differentiating inorganic and organic soil C.

Improved calibration278 in the analysis of plants by LIBS was achieved by creating a set of matrix-matched calibration standards that allowed results statistically similar to ICP-AES data (at 95% confidence interval) to be obtained for the determination of Ca, Cu, K, Mg, Mn, P and Zn in sugar cane. A blank (or low concentration) standard, prepared by extraction of ground sugar cane leaves with 0.2 M HNO3, was mixed with various aliquots of the original ground leaves and pressed into pellets to produce the calibrants. The latest in a series of similar papers reporting the determination of specific analytes in Gannan navel oranges focussed on the determination of Cd (ref. 279) and Cr (ref. 280). The studies were successful in that they yielded similar results to AAS analysis, but only the outer surface of the fruit was analysed so the relevance of the measurement in terms of food contamination assessment is questionable.

A rapid LIBS method281 for identification of P-containing proteins separated by gel electrophoresis used an extract of Brassica napus (canola, a cultivar of rapeseed) as test substrate. The prominent band observed at 45 kDa was excised, digested and identified by MALDI-MS as ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, the primary plant enzyme in carbon fixation.

3.3.6 X-ray spectrometry. A critical review282 (145 references) of metal(loid) speciation in environmental samples by XAS provided an excellent introduction to the field. It explained the underlying principles of EXAFS and XANES spectrometries, provided example applications, and highlighted emerging trends and research needs.

The use of 1600 rather than 400 kN in a new high pressure sample preparation apparatus, as described in a Chinese language article283 (with English abstract), improved sensitivity and hence LOD by reducing particle size. The apparatus produced dense, flat, smooth and crack-free pellets from soil and sediment samples suitable for XRF analysis without the addition of binder.

As in LIBS, increased use of chemometric tools has proved beneficial in XRF analysis. Akbulut284 successfully used PLS and principal component regression calibration models to predict concentrations of As, Ba, Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, Rb, Sr, V and Zn in a suit of CRMs, including soils and sediments, analysed by EDXRF spectrometry. Ghasemi et al.285 employed PLS, principal component regression and support vector machine algorithms to overcome overlap between the Na (Kα) and Zn (Lα) lines in analysis of soil by WDXRF spectrometry.

In the analysis of plants, the first use286 of μ-EDXRF spectrometry for quantitative determination of macro- and micro-nutrients and silicon in plant materials (specifically sugar cane) was reported. A μ-PIXE method287 for analysis of frozen-hydrated sections of biological materials such as plants, mentioned in a previous update,288 was improved to allow the handling of thinner samples (20–50 μm thickness).

Improvements in the LODs achievable with field portable XRF spectrometry are allowing established uses such as the screening of highly contaminated soils, e.g. from abandoned mines,289 to be supplemented by more novel applications, e.g. analysis of plant litter,290 peatland samples291 and agricultural soil.292 However, as demonstrated in a study293 of As in French soils, care is still required to optimise analytical parameters and to correct for factors that can affect results, especially the sample moisture content, which can affect the XRF signal. It should be noted that this moisture need not be in the liquid state. Wiendorf et al.294 showed that results for in situ analysis of frozen Alaskan soils, laboratory analysis of refrozen soils and laboratory analysis of melted soils were all less than results for oven dry soils, using Ba, Ca, Cr, Fe, K, Mn, Pb, Rb, Sr, Ti, Zn and Zr as test analytes.

4 Analysis of geological materials

4.1 Reference materials and data quality

It is not always widely appreciated that proficiency testing schemes and inter-laboratory comparisons (sometimes referred to as ‘round robins’) are designed to serve different purposes. Participation in a proficiency testing scheme forms part of a laboratory's routine QC procedures to enable it to detect unsuspected errors in its analytical systems, and take appropriate action, thus providing an independent demonstration of its data quality. An assessment295 of data submitted in the period 2001–2011 to the GeoPT proficiency testing scheme for geochemical laboratories run by the International Association of Geoanalysts (IAG), identified elements and concentration ranges over which routine analytical performance could be considered satisfactory. This study, in itself, is a marker of the overall data quality generated by geochemical laboratories. Some suggestions were made for the causes of unsatisfactory performance, such as incomplete digestion of resistant minerals or unsuspected interferences, which may deserve more detailed investigation.

In contrast, inter-laboratory comparisons provide a snapshot of the state-of-the-art rather than feedback on performance to individual laboratories. Measurements296 of Sr/Ca in coral from 21 laboratories involved in an international collaboration reconstructing past seawater temperatures showed that inter-laboratory bias could be significant. Of the many potential sources of bias, traces of Sr in Ca standards and uncertainties in reference solution composition accounted for half of the combined uncertainty. During this exercise the GSJ RM JCp-1 (Porites coral) was sufficiently well characterised to be accorded a ‘certified’ Sr/Ca value of 8.838 ± 0.089 mmol mol−1, according to IAG guidelines. An inter-laboratory comparison297 of measurements of B isotopes in a range of marine biogenic carbonates (coral, foraminifera, brachiopods) deliberately involved just four laboratories, each using a different analytical technique. No significant inter-laboratory biases were observed for boric acid or seawater, a common in-house RM, but the carbonate samples had a pooled 2 SD of 1.46‰ for δ11B, which was larger than the measurement uncertainty reported by each laboratory. Overall sample size, in terms of total B available, and B/Ca ratio in each sample were significant factors contributing to the overall uncertainty, although the exact mechanisms were uncertain. Despite the encouraging agreement, the results demonstrated the need for a suite of well-characterised marine carbonate RMs for B isotope determinations.

An inter-laboratory comparison298 of U–Pb dating of synthetic detrital zircons by LA-ICP-MS and SIMS, involving 10 laboratories that routinely perform this type of analysis, reported a level of bias mostly within 2% of the ID-TIMS U–Pb age. Variable rates of Pb–U laser-induced elemental fractionation resulting from differences between the zircon matrix of the samples and RMs used for calibration was thought to be the main cause of this bias. The precision of individual zircon age determinations was mainly influenced by the procedures used for data reduction and measurement propagation, and was largely independent of instrumentation, analytical technique and RMs. Most laboratories underestimated the true uncertainty of their measurements, resulting in reported values with confidence limits outside the uncertainty of the age predicted by ID-TIMS data. All laboratories showed a bias towards selecting larger grains for analysis and it was recommended that grain selection should be randomised.

Several new potential RMs for U–Pb dating have been characterised. SoriZ93 zircon,299 obtained from the residual mineral fraction after the preparation of the SORI93 biotite RM from a Japanese granodiorite, was analysed using a SHRIMP. Cathodoluminescence imaging revealed a fine oscillatory zoning, typical of zircons with no xenocrystic core from granitic rocks. Although some mineral inclusions were present, it was possible to select an inclusion-free zone 30 μm wide necessary for analysis by the microbeam technique. With a recommended 206Pb/238U age of 93.9 ± 0.6 Ma (95% confidence limit), the SoriZ93 zircon was proposed as a suitable RM for dating Late Cretaceous zircons. Qinghu zircon grains,300 from the Qinghu quartz monzonite from SE China, were considered to be sufficiently homogeneous at the 20 to 60 μm scale to be proposed as a working RM for U–Pb age (159.5 ± 0.2 Ma) and Hf and O isotope determinations. Careful selection of suitable areas for microanalysis with the aid of a photomicrograph and catholodoluminescence imaging was recommended as some of the grains contained opaque mineral inclusions and a few grains had high U and Th contents. In response to the general lack of sufficiently abundant and high quality rutile RMs for in situ U–Pb geochronology, two new rutile samples301 from granulite facies metasedimentary rocks in the Canadian Shield were chosen as candidate RMs (Sugluk-4 and PCA-S207). Characterisation of these materials showed that their U–Pb compositions, including any common Pb, were much more homogeneous than those of existing rutile RMs. The new RMs were used to develop a U–Pb normalisation procedure that did not rely on a correction for common Pb, resulting in a long-term reproducibility of 2–4% (2 RSD) for 206Pb/238U and 207Pb/206Pb, which was only slightly worse than that for long-term data for zircon RMs. Using a 50 μm LA spot size, the sensitivity of the LA-MC-ICP-MS set-up employed allowed dating of ca. 90% of rutiles within a sediment containing rutile as young as 10–20 Ma, and eliminated the need to pre-screen the samples for low U concentrations.

Exciting developments in the preparation of nanoparticulate powders with a prescribed composition have opened up new possibilities for the production of true matrix-matched RMs for the calibration and validation of microanalytical techniques such as LA-ICP-MS, EPMA, SIMS and SR-XRF. The flame spray technique was used to produce a nanomaterial302 with a matrix composition similar to that of NIST SRM 610 glass plus a selection of REEs, precious metals and Pb at concentrations of 400–500 mg kg−1. The liquid precursor mixture was sprayed and collected as a nanopowder, pressed to form pellets (without a binder) and analysed by solution ICP-MS, LA-ICP-MS and EPMA. The material synthesised was homogeneous for major elements and REEs at a scale similar to that for the NIST 610 glass, i.e. <5% RSD, whereas the spatial variation of the PGEs was larger at <7.5% RSD. In addition, contamination during production resulted in heterogeneous distributions of Ag and Pb. The major advantage of this technique is that the composition can be tailored to the specific requirements of the application and up to several 100 g can be prepared in a single batch. In an alternative approach, Garbe-Schönberg and Müller303 prepared NPs powders with a typical grain size of d50 < 1.5 μm by wet-milling in aqueous suspension using a high power planetary ball mill and agate tools. Pressed powder tablets produced from this NP material without the incorporation of any binder had excellent cohesion, homogeneity and mechanical stability. A selection of geochemical CRMs covering a wide range of natural rock types, prepared by this procedure and analysed by LA-ICP-MS gave precisions of 2–5% RSD. The preferred values could be reproduced for most of the 38 trace elements determined. These figures of merit were similar to those obtained from LA of glasses and were significantly better than data reported from the analysis of pressed powders in many previous studies. As no binder was required, LODs in the low ppb range were achieved and volatile elements were quantitatively retained. A few elements, such as Mo, Sb, Sn, W and Zn, did not satisfy the precision and accuracy criteria required. One source of contamination was thought to be the anvil and dies in the tablet press, made of alloyed steel or tungsten carbide.

Chinese reference glasses304 with the compositions of basalt, syenite, andesite and soil were evaluated for U-series measurements by MC-TIMS and MC-ICP-MS. The Th–U concentration and isotopic data obtained by the two techniques agreed within estimated errors. The value of these glasses to the community comes from the large 238U–234U–230Th disequilibria observed, combined with the wide range in Th/U ratios; the long-term aim is to develop them as microanalytical RMs. Given the routine use of the NIST SRM 61x series of glasses for calibrating microanalytical techniques, there are surprisingly few data available on their U isotopic composition. This has now been rectified to some extent with the publication305 of atom percent and U isotope ratios for all four glasses determined by fs LA-MC-ICP-MS. Results for NIST SRM 610 were in excellent agreement with literature values but the atom percent 235U measured did not match the certificate values. Large corrections required for PtAr+ interferences on the U minor isotopes, as a result of platinum introduced from the crucible during the preparation of the glass, may have contributed to these discrepancies. Thorium and U concentrations in four marine sediment CRMs (NIST 1646a and NRCC HISS-1, MESS-3 and PACS-2) were re-evaluated306 using ID-MC-ICP-MS. The new ID data were consistently lower than the informative values on the original certificates and also there were heterogeneities in the distributions of these elements in 100 mg subsamples of the CRMs.

Molybdenum isotope variations are increasingly being used to investigate the oxygenation of the Earth's ocean and atmosphere. Despite attempts to establish NIST SRM 3134 (Mo standard solution) as the delta zero, there is still no internationally accepted RM for Mo isotope composition in studies of mass-dependent isotope fractionation. Nagler et al.307 proposed that δ98Mo/95Mo in NIST SRM 3134 now be defined as +0.25‰, rather than zero. They argued that this would facilitate the comparison of previous δ98Mo/95Mo data obtained using other RMs, which had δ98Mo/95Mo values in the relatively narrow range of −0.16 to 0.37‰ relative to NIST SRM 3134. They also recommended the use of open ocean seawater, of which there are limitless supplies, as a secondary RM with a defined δ98Mo/95Mo of +2.34 ± 0.10‰. Meanwhile Mayer and Wieser308 determined the absolute isotopic composition and atomic weight of Mo in SRM 3134 by MC-ICP-MS using a 92Mo–98Mo double-spike to correct for instrumental mass bias. These data should go a long way to establishing SRM 3134 as the international standard for Mo isotope measurements.

4.2 Solid sample introduction

4.2.1 Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Although LA sample introduction is in widespread use in many scientific disciplines, geological applications still drive many developments in LA-(MC)-ICP-MS.309 This was exemplified in an authoritative review310 (50 references) of recent instrumental and methodological advances in ICP-MS and LA-ICP-MS analysis. A more basic review255 (179 references) highlighted the factors affecting accurate elemental analysis of geological materials by LA-ICP-MS.

Now that modern instrumentation permits high spatial resolution measurements at the μm-scale over a very wide range of concentrations, there is increasing interest in elemental imaging or mapping of geological materials by LA-ICP-MS. This application has necessitated further developments such as optimised ablation cell designs for rapid wash-out, reduction in cross-contamination when rastering across a sample and the development of appropriate data processing software to produce the images.311 Recent examples included the mapping of trace elements in biogenic and inorganic carbonates with complex internal geometries.312 An in-line signal smoothing device provided much more stable signals and less noise in the data. Pre-ablation cleaning was found necessary for accurate determination of some trace elements, particularly Al and Zn. Multielement maps of element distributions in a Late Archean impact spherule layer were acquired313 by LA-ICP-MS at a lateral resolution of 15 μm. A teardrop ablation cell (volume 2.9 cm3) had better performance characteristics than a larger standard circular cell (volume 33 cm3) for this application. Helium was preferred over argon as the transport gas to prevent redeposition of ablated particles on the sample surface. Significant matrix effects were observed314 during the production of elemental maps of iron meteorites when ablating the different iron phases with a 213 nm laser system. Careful application of a matrix-matched external standard and proper internal standardisation were essential to correct for these matrix effects. The potential for a combination of LA-ICP-MS and LIBS to provide expanded elemental coverage for simultaneous 3D imaging was demonstrated using a rare earth ore sample.315 Following data acquisition, the signals from the two techniques were integrated and reassigned to xyz spatial coordinates to produce layer-by-layer 2D elemental maps. Basic principles of computed tomography were adopted to visualise multiple elemental and isotopic distributions in 3D.

Investigations into fundamental aspects of LA-ICP-MS provided a better understanding of some of the complex processes involved. The sensitivity of a HR MC-ICP-MS instrument was improved316ca. 2-fold through a series of modifications to the geometry of the sampler and skimmer cones, the interface pumping configuration and source lens. This enabled micro-sampling at a higher spatial resolution with no loss in accuracy. In another study, signal enhancement was achieved317 by the addition of water and/or ethanol vapour to laser-ablated dry aerosols, using a custom-made introduction system that provided long-term stability. For most of the 60 elements studied, the addition of small amounts of water and/or 1–4% (v/v) ethanol vapour, in combination with a shielded torch, improved the sensitivity of LA-ICP-MS measurements by a factor of 2.5–3.0. Spatial profiling of analyte and background species in the ICP provided insights into some of the mechanisms for this enhancement. Further investigations318 into the effect of carrier gas humidity on the vaporisation of laser-produced aerosols in ICPs utilised an ICP-AES instrument with a Czerny–Turner monochromator operating in 2D imaging mode to obtain axial profiles of the ICP. Under dry conditions, the profiles for Ca and Na in the ICP were separated by several mm. However, by introducing precise amounts of water via a micro-droplet dispenser, the two axial profiles were superimposed over a range of humidities. These observations supported the hypothesis that, under these conditions, the two elements vaporised at the same position in the plasma. These operating conditions were then used for quantitative analysis of silicate glass by LA-ICP-MS, resulting in a significant improvement in the accuracy as well as lower LODs, with only a moderate increase in oxide formation. The performance of LA sampling in air was compared319 to that of conventional LA in a closed cell for the determination of isotope ratios by MC-ICP-MS using a fs laser. Samples of galena, zircon and brass were ablated in air and the aerosol generated aspirated into a gas exchange device, in which the air was replaced with argon before transfer to the ICP. Comparable precisions and accuracies were obtained making the system suitable for isotope determinations of materials too large to fit into an ablation cell. However, the signal intensities from the atmospheric sampling method were lower by up to a factor of five. Further modifications, such as more stable gas flows and improved sampling efficiency, were recommended for fast and spatially resolved determinations using scanning mode LA.

Although it has been established that, in general, short pulse fs LA sample introduction provides better accuracy and precision than the use of long pulse ns lasers, the fundamental ablation mechanisms of fs lasers are still being evaluated. Particles320 produced by ablating magnetite, siderite, pyrrhotite and pyrite with a UV fs laser were collected with a cascade impactor and the various size fractions analysed by solution MC-ICP-MS for their Fe isotope composition. Despite the isotopic variations observed across the aerosol size fractions, the composition of the total aerosol, as calculated from a mass balance, was stoichiometric in terms of its Fe isotope content for all the minerals ablated. As well as providing insights into the behaviour of condensates from laser-induced plasmas, the study demonstrated the importance of quantitative transport of the laser aerosol to the ICP. Data321 obtained for Cu isotopes in cubanite by LA-MC-ICP-MS using two fs laser systems operating at 260 nm and 780 nm showed better precision for the UV fs system (<0.10‰, 2 SE). At both laser wavelengths, matrix-matched standards were still required for reliable Cu isotope data. An IR (λ = 1030 nm) fs LA system was used to sample micrometre-sized U-containing particles to determine 235U/238U by quadrupole ICP-MS.63 The particles were first fixed on a transparent polycarbonate disk and then located either by observing fission tracks after irradiation or by SEM using EDXRF. Laser repetition rate was a major factor affecting the isotopic measurements whereas plasma humidity had no significant effect. Accuracy and reproducibility were typically <4% for a 15 s transient signal, in which between 10 and 200 pg U was sampled. No isotopic fractionation was detected and the technique was capable of analysing about 100 particles a day. In a study322 of the ablation characteristics of brass and NIST 612 glass using a 1030 nm fs laser, higher laser repetition rates and larger spot sizes (>70 μm) resulted in better estimation of elemental ratios. Additional work was required to separate fractionation effects at the ablation site from those in the ICP.

A review323 of fluid and melt inclusion studies showed how these reflect developments in analytical techniques over the years (111 references). Directions for future research may include: age measurements of inclusion fluids; the use of biomarkers, noble gas isotopes and halogens to trace the source of inclusions; and the study of micro-organisms in fluid inclusions. The current state-of-the-art was assessed324 using a highly sensitive SF-ICP-MS instrument coupled to a 193 nm excimer laser to analyse an assemblage of fluid inclusions (from a few to ca. 200 μm in size) with identical salinities of 4.0 ± 0.1 wt% NaCl equivalent. For 21 elements covering the mass range from Li to Pb, the LODs were 10 times lower than those determined by quadrupole ICP-MS using the same laser system, while the cycle time was only 20% longer for such a suite of elements. The absolute LOD for Au was 1 fg (10−15 g). Albrecht et al.325 employed a 194 nm fs laser coupled to a fast scanning SF-ICP-MS instrument with SEM and Faraday detectors to determine B, Bi, Cd, K, Pb, Te and Tl at a concentration of 53 μg g−1 in NaCl–H2O synthetic fluid inclusions in quartz. To gain the best advantage from the low heat transfer properties of the fs laser, the ablations were performed at temperatures of around −40 °C using a modified heating-freezing stage as the ablation cell. As a result, frozen fluid inclusions (8 to 25 μm in diameter) down to a depth of 50 μm below the surface, could be opened very precisely, thereby giving LODs varying between 0.1 μg g−1 for 209Bi to 10 μg g−1 for 39K. Typical analytical uncertainties were 15 to 30% (1 RSD), a significant improvement in precision compared to earlier studies for samples with relatively low analyte concentrations. Although various methods for synthesising reference fluid inclusions have been published previously, the details given have often been insufficient to replicate the procedure. For this reason, the preparation326 of liquid–vapour inclusions in the H2O–CH4–NaCl system were described in great detail. The method used pre-existing microcavities in polished quartz chips, which were decrepitated and rinsed before being treated with a NaCl solution of known composition in an autoclave at a fixed temperature and pressure for up to four weeks to synthesize the new inclusions. Advantages of this procedure included quicker healing of the microfractures at lower temperatures, choice of larger inclusions, simple quartz sample preparation, the ability to control the composition of the fluid inclusions, and the use of commercial autoclaves. A summary of methods used to analyse acid saline fluid inclusions327 noted the difficulties of employing LA-ICP-MS for this purpose due to the extreme chemistry of these inclusions, often located in halite and gypsum matrices.

The ablation characteristics of sulfide minerals are complex and vary depending on the mineral being ablated. This was demonstrated in a recent LA-ICP-MS study328 in which the amount of S fractionation, relative to Fe, was compared for a range of sulfide minerals using three different LA systems: a 213 nm Nd:YAG, a 193 nm Nd:YAG and a 193 nm excimer. Although significant fractionation occurred in all the sulfides, its extent was dependent on the amount of melting around the ablation crater, which was mainly mineral specific and primarily dependent on its physical properties. Consequently, matrix-matched standards were necessary for accurate S determinations using either the 213 nm or the 193 nm lasers systems. In related work, laser parameters for the determination of S isotopes in sulfide minerals by LA-ICP-MS were investigated329 using two different 193 nm lasers. Matrix effects were reduced by increasing the laser fluence, but the optimal fluence for each laser system needed to be evaluated as it was dependent on laser wavelength and pulse width. The design and material of the tubing between the ablation cell and the ICP were found to be critical for improving the precision and washout time for S. The isotopic composition and homogeneity of a range of sulfide minerals were characterised for use as potential RMs, including a large isotopically homogeneous pyrite crystal PPP-1 (δ34S = 5.3 ± 0.2‰). Because of a paucity of suitable matrix-matched standards, a multi-standard approach330 was adopted for the LA-ICP-MS analysis of sulfides from a PGE deposit in South Africa. Several RMs, including a new synthetic in-house standard containing As, Sb, Se and Te, bracketed the unknown samples, and 33S derived from EPMA measurements was used as the internal standard. A similar approach, involving the measurement of two RMs and a blank before and after every unknown,331 was adopted in the determination of trace elements in pyrite from a magmatic sulfide Ni–Cu ore deposit in Spain. In this case, internal standardisation was based on 57Fe obtained from the mean Fe value in each pyrite. In a study332 of a zoned Ge-rich sphalerite from the main Ge deposit in western Europe, SEM and EPMA were used to define major and minor element distributions. A detailed assessment of isobaric interferences on Ge was carried out before a wide range of trace elements was determined by LA-ICP-MS. In combination with Ge isotopes measured by MC-ICP-MS, S isotopes by SIMS and mineralogical observations, the trace element data were used to discriminate between different ore types and shed light on the genesis of the deposit.

Zircon has become the most popular accessory phase for U–Pb age determinations because of its widespread abundance, resistance to abrasion, its ability to retain trace elements over geological time and its low initial content of non-radiogenic Pb (common Pb). New results333 on young zircons (<1 Ma) demonstrated that LA-ICP-MS can reproduce the precision and accuracy of the SHRIMP, while analysing many more zircons with relative ease. Improvements in the design of the two-volume ablation cell ensured that the cell volume and gas flow remained truly constant while moving the samples in the sample holder. Samples were corrected for initial thorium disequilibrium using a new formula that accounts for disequilibrium in 230Th decay. The counts on 204Pb and 207Pb were too low to correct reliably for common Pb and other strategies were needed to minimise its influence on the dataset. A modified methodology334 allowed the rapid analysis of large numbers of detrital zircons by LA-ICP-MS without compromising analytical precision or accuracy. Based on generating ages using integrated total counts of Pb and U rather than a series of integrated Pb/U ratios, which require longer counting times, additional refinements in sample preparation, imaging and automation resulted in a sampling rate of ca. 180 analyses h−1. Consequently, much more statistically robust datasets for 300–1000 detrital zircons could be produced for provenance investigations at an economic cost. Looking to the future, developments in real-time data reduction will be a considerable aid in enabling the analyst to decide when a sufficient number of analyses have been completed.

Detailed investigations335 of systematic biases observed for zircon U–Pb ages determined by LA-ICP-MS with a 193 nm excimer laser, using ID-TIMS as the reference technique, revealed that there were small but significant differences in ablation rate between reference and sample zircons. Intrinsic optical properties of the zircon matrix and subtle defocusing effects of the laser beam both contributed to variations in ablation rates. Although thermal annealing changed the ablation behaviour of the zircons by reducing the amount of radiation damage, the variation in behaviour between different zircon matrices was not eliminated. A discrete multi-pulse method336 designed to acquire LA depth profiles when coupled to a quadrupole ICP-MS system was able to resolve variations in U–Pb ages in zircon at the sub-μm scale. Isotopic ratios were calculated by integrating the total counts on a transient signal generated by discrete bursts of 5 laser pulses. Correction for fractionation effects was achieved through iterative smoothing and interpolation of a continuous function, non-parametric 3D surface from which discrete values for any time and sample depth could be calculated. There was a high positive correlation between radiation damage, crystal lattice distortion and ablation pit depths. These data indicated that radiation damage exerted a fundamental control on LA efficiency although the exact process was unknown. Consequently, large differences in the amount of radiation damage suffered by RMs and unknown zircons would result in a degradation of accuracy and precision. Another factor found to influence laser-induced elemental fractionation was the amount of oxygen in the helium carrier gas flushing the ablation cell.337 Oxygen concentrations in the carrier gas as low as 500 ppm shifted U–Pb ages measured in zircon by as much as 9%, well above the typical analytical uncertainty of zircon dating by LA-ICP-MS. The addition of larger amounts of oxygen increased the instrument sensitivity significantly, as well as promoting Th and U oxide formation, probably as a consequence of improved atomisation and ionisation capabilities of the mixed gas ICP. This study highlighted the importance of maintaining a constant level of oxygen in the ablation cell over an analytical session as a prerequisite for improvements in the precision of such measurements.

Age determinations by LA-ICP-MS of other U-bearing accessory minerals such as apatite, allanite, titanite and rutile typically requires the use of matrix-matched standards. These measurements may often be complicated by variable amounts of common (or initial) Pb not only in the unknown samples but in the RMs as well. Chew et al.338 proposed a general approach to correcting for common Pb using a modified version of the VizualAge U–Pb data reduction package for Iolite software. Advantages of this data reduction scheme were that it could incorporate any accessory mineral standard, even if it contained variable amounts of common Pb, and it could be applied to raw data files from the majority of modern ICP-MS instruments. Studies on the optimal conditions for the reliable U–Pb age determinations by LA-ICP-MS for titanite,339 bastnaesite,340 allanite341 and rutile342 all emphasised the importance of a matrix-matched RM to correct for laser-induced elemental fractionation and other matrix effects.

Not only are measurements of Hf isotopes in zircon by LA-MC-ICP-MS subject to large isobaric interferences but molecular interferences can be significant, depending on the rate of oxide formation. The magnitude343 of these isobaric and REE oxide interferences were reassessed using a series of natural zircons and synthetic glass beads. Molecular interferences from Gd oxides were found to be more significant than those from Dy oxides. A protocol for correcting for these interferences involved the daily monitoring of the rate of formation of Gd and Hf oxides. Guidelines344 for reporting in situ Hf isotope data stressed the importance of supplying sufficient detail, including the procedure adopted for interference corrections, to enable reviewers and readers to assess the quality of the data presented. Potential pitfalls included assignment of incorrect ages and the difficulty of estimating the uncertainties in the initial Hf composition of zircon. One way of ensuring that correct ages are assigned to the Hf isotope compositions in complex zircons was to use the technique known as LA split stream.345 By splitting the laser aerosol downstream of the ablation cell, simultaneous measurements346 of U–Pb ages by single-collector ICP-MS and Hf isotopes by MC-ICP-MS were made with little degradation of precision in the Hf isotope data. The veracity of this approach was demonstrated by analysing 10 reference zircons with well-characterised age and Hf isotopic compositions, using laser spot diameters of 30 and 40 μm.

Other studies of in situ isotopic determinations by LA-MC-ICP-MS included an evaluation of matrix effects during the measurement of B isotopes in tourmaline,347 optimisation of ICP interface conditions for low oxide formation in the determination of Nd isotope ratios in glasses and minerals348 and use of an enhanced sensitivity mass spectrometer349 for Pb isotope measurements of silicate rocks and minerals with low Pb contents.

4.2.2 Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. An excellent review267 of geochemical and environmental applications of LIBS (216 references) also provided a comprehensive account of the fundamentals of the technique, its versatility in the analysis of a wide range of materials and the various statistical signal processing techniques employed. Lin et al.350 reviewed the development of instrumentation that combines LIBS and Raman spectroscopy (90 references). After a presentation of the basic principles and technological aspects of the combined technique, a variety of applications were discussed, including the analysis of geological materials and deployment in future planetary missions. The performance of LIBS for the determination of light (low atomic number) elements in non-conducting materials was assessed from previously published studies.268 Future improvements in sensitivity by combining LIBS employing fs laser pulses with other diagnostic techniques based on probing the plasma via diode lasers were anticipated.

Much of the development of the LIBS technique, including the associated statistical analysis and interpretation of LIBS data, has stemmed from its inclusion as an integral component of analytical instrumentation on the NASA Curiosity Mars Science Laboratory. The advantages of using independent component analysis, rather than PCA to classify rocks remotely were demonstrated351 by modelling LIBS data from the ChemCam instrument on board the Mars rover. In another study, two different multivariate techniques,352 PLS discriminant analysis and support vector machines (SVMs), were used to correlate LIBS data from 16 Triassic sedimentary rocks (sandstone, limestone and mudstone) acquired with both Czerny-Turner and Echelle spectrometer systems. A combination of the Echelle spectrometer system with SVM statistical analysis provided nearly 100% accurate classification of the sedimentary rocks analysed. In an evaluation353 of spectral lines for the determination of trace amounts of U in uraninite and NIST 1872 glass RMs by LIBS, low ppm LODs were achieved by careful selection of an appropriate emission line with minimal spectral interferences.

Isotope ratio measurements by LIBS are difficult because of collision-induced broadening of spectral lines and the very small isotopic spectral shift characteristic of atomic transitions.267 Computer simulation was used to evaluate a method354 for improving the precision of U isotope ratios by monitoring multiple LIBS emission lines. The precision of these measurements depended primarily on the signal-to-background ratio and the net intensity of the emission line, rather than the magnitude of isotopic splitting. In an alternative approach,355 which took advantage of the fact that molecular isotopic shifts can be significantly greater than the respective atomic isotope shifts, spectral analysis of molecular emissions from laser-induced plasmas were used to determine B isotope ratios in samples of boron carbide.

4.3 Sample preparation

4.3.1 Sample dissolution. Simpler methods developed for the dissolution of chromite ores included automated fusion356 with a flux of Na2O2–Na2CO3 in a zirconium crucible which provided a quick and cost-effective dissolution method for the analysis of chromite ores, ferrochromes and chromium slags by ICP-AES. A protocol357 for the decomposition of chromite based on oxidation by bromic acid at room temperature in closed plastic vessels was devised for the measurement of Cr isotope abundance. After treatment with HF to decompose the silicate matrix, two additions of bromic acid over a 15 day period were required because of the acid's limited stability. No statistical difference between Cr isotopic compositions measured on solutions prepared by a conventional alkaline oxidative fusion and by bromic acid decomposition was observed.

Since the report of a dissolution procedure358 employing NH4HF2 in last year's ASU, the use of ammonium fluoride (NH4F) has been systematically investigated359 because it has a higher boiling point (260 °C) and so can be used in open digestion vessels. For complete digestion of refractory minerals, a 6 + 1 proportion of NH4F to sample mass was recommended. The main advantages of this method were that it was performed in screw-top PFA vials rather than high pressure digestion bombs, it did not suffer from the formation of insoluble fluorides and the reagent was removed by taking the sample to dryness before making up to volume for analysis by quadrupole ICP-MS. However, NH4F has many of the same safety handling requirements of HF, especially when heated to dryness to remove Si as SiF4.

Qi et al.360 produced a new design of Carius tube consisting of a main body with 3 mm thick glass, a neck and head with 4 mm thick walls and an efficient screw-thread stopper. These new features reduced the time taken in manipulating the samples compared to the traditional design and allowed the tubes to be reused many times. Low procedural blanks for Os, Re and the PGEs were demonstrated.

A new microfluorination method361 for the determination of δ18O values in quartz and silicate microfossils utilised high temperature pyrolysis with continuous flow IRMS. Dehydroxylated samples were mixed with PTFE powder and graphite in silver foil capsules and reacted in a standard thermal conductivity elemental analyser. The graphite provided an additional source of labile carbon, facilitating quantitative formation of CO during pyrolysis at 1450 °C.

4.3.2 Sample separation and preconcentration. Several new methods for the separation and purification of boron prior to isotopic measurements have been proposed. In a protocol362 based on sublimation of B, the silicate samples were first digested with HF and mannitol at 80 °C for 3 days. Doping the rock digests with a concentrated solution of NaCl before micro-sublimation in PFA vials appeared to suppress the evaporation of major elements and improve the B recovery. Artefacts in the B isotope ratios determined by MC-ICP-MS arising from silicon and other matrix elements in the sublimate were estimated to contribute a typical bias of <−0.8‰ δ11B. When combined with the uncertainty of the MC-ICP-MS measurements (better than 0.3‰) and the blank contribution of <0.3‰, the total uncertainty of the δ11B measurements was considered to be suitable for many geochemical investigations. In an alternative approach,363 a B-specific resin, Amberlite IRA 743, was used to separate rock digests prepared by alkaline fusion (or acid dissolution for carbonates). The blanks from the three-column ion-exchange procedure (0.50 ± 0.04 ng, 2 RSD), were considered to be negligible compared to the sample size. More than 98% B was recovered from each step and the final solution medium was appropriate for analysis by TIMS and MC-ICP-MS. The reader may also wish to consult a recent review of B isotope variations in nature and methods for their determination.364

Of interest to isotope geochemists, for whom low analytical blanks are critical, is the development of a Teflon HPLC system.365 Its construction was made possible by the availability of Teflon components used in the semi-conductor industry. Features of the system included a fluid-flow path that is entirely enclosed in Teflon, fully automated elution schemes in which the electronic controls are protected from corrosive fumes, temperature control of the entire system and a modular design that can be adapted to a variety of separation schemes. Using this system, it was possible to separate Ni from Mg using one long column at an elevated temperature, as opposed to up to five passes using traditional column chromatographic schemes. The effective separation of individual REEs could also be achieved using a long column and elevated temperatures. Although some challenges, such as the tailing of the REEs, still remained, this development may have a significant influence on how such analytical studies are conducted in the future.

Persimmon, a fruit rich in tannin and known to contain several polyphenols, was employed as a novel reagent for the preconcentratation of gold from geological materials.366 The persimmon was modified by treatment with 4 M HNO3 to promote crosslinking between tannin and polysaccharides and thereby improve its absorption characteristics. The powder was then used as a SPE adsorbent for the separation and preconcentration of Au in 3% aqua regia before analysis by ICP-MS. The LOD was 1.32 ng L−1 (3σ) and the precision (n = 11) at 1.0 μg L−1 0.83% (RSD). Another method191 for the preconcentration of Au from anodic slime, gold ore, soil and waters samples was based on coprecipitation with a 1,2,4-triazole derivative and had a FAAS LOD of 0.36 pg L−1 Au and a RSD of 5.1%.

Elemental species in rocks are rarely determined but knowledge of Cr species in phosphate rock is important when the rock is used as a precursor in the production of fertilisers.367 In order to prevent interconversion of the Cr species, ultrasound digestion in 4 mL of 4 M HNO3 was used and CrIII was separated at pH 9 on MWCNTs acting as the SPE absorbent. The total Cr concentration was determined by FAAS after reduction of CrV to CrIII. The LOD for CrIII was 0.288 mg kg−1. For a full account of recent developments in speciation analysis, the relevant ASU4 should be consulted.

4.4 Instrumental analysis

4.4.1 Atomic emission spectrometry. The analysis of complex geological matrices, such as ores, by ICP-AES often requires specific methods for optimum results. During the development of a protocol for the ICP-AES determination of 13 major and minor elements in nickeliferous minerals,368 the most suitable digestion conditions, spectral lines, plasma operating conditions and matrix effects were all assessed experimentally. Matrix-matched calibration solutions with high levels of Fe or Mg were required to achieve accurate results. For the ICP-AES measurement of U in uranium ores,369 the results at three U emission lines were compared using matrix-matched standards, plasma optimisation or an internal standard (Sm) as alternative ways of compensating for matrix interferences. The main factor influencing precision and accuracy was the U wavelength selected but use of a Sm internal standard improved accuracy at all the lines.

A tutorial review370 of recent advances in microwave plasma sources for optical emission and MS highlighted the great number of different designs of MP cavities available and their future potential. Until recently, the use of MP-AES has mainly been confined to the analysis of gaseous samples, with limited application to liquids. However, this may change with the development of robust, commercially-available MIP-AES instruments offering fast sequential multi-element analysis. The potential of one such instrument for the bulk analysis of geochemical samples371 and the determination of precious metals in rocks and ores372 has been assessed. The technique provided LODs that were much superior to those obtained by FAAS (and comparable to ICP-AES LODs for some elements) with longer linear dynamic ranges, thereby removing the need for time-consuming dilutions often required for FAAS. Data for major and minor elements in a series of geological RMs had good accuracy with a precision of ≤3%. Precious metals could be determined at sub μg g−1 levels after appropriate separation and preconcentration of the analytes. The instrument had the great advantage of low running costs as only nitrogen was required to operate the plasma so making it ideal for use in laboratories in remote locations.

4.4.2 Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Advances in instrumentation, not least the emergence of MC-ICP-MS, over the last 20 years has revolutionised the analytical methods and innovations in isotope geochemistry. In a review373 (305 references) of recent discoveries and future challenges that still confront isotope geochemists, closer collaborations with chemists and physicists were encouraged because some observations emerging from stable isotope geochemistry have the potential for new insights into the nature of chemical bonds and reactions. Silicon isotope geochemistry is just one field that has grown rapidly since the advent of MC-ICP-MS so a review374 (156 references) of the latest breakthroughs in high-temperature Si isotope geochemistry, and associated analytical methodologies, was very timely. Chiaradia et al.375 offered basic guidelines to address some fundamental problems that they believed are overlooked in many geochronological studies designed to date magmatic-hydrothermal events in porphyry systems using a combination of U–Pb, Re–Os and 40Ar/39Ar methods. A novel teaching exercise376 designed to introduce the concepts of stable isotope fractionation to geochemistry students may be of interest to those involved in teaching the next generation of geochemists. Participants were asked to read several scientific papers and then develop spreadsheets to test the proposed fractionation models. Although the students found the construction of the spreadsheet the most challenging part of the exercise, many transferable skills were developed during the process.

Many of the recent developments in the determination of isotope ratios in geological materials by ICP-MS involve a combination of modifications in sample preparation and measurement procedures. Table 6 summarises this information.

Table 6 Methods used in the determination of isotope ratios in geological materials by ICP-MS
Analyte Matrix Sample treatment Detector Comments References
B Roman glass Digested with HF–HNO3 at 110 °C for 2 days; mannitol added and taken to dryness at 70 °C; aqua regia added and heated at 110 °C for 2 days; mannitol added and taken to dryness at 70 °C; residue redissolved in 0.02 M HCl. Two-step column separation: (a) cation-exchange resin Dowex AG 50W-X8, major cations retained on resin while B eluted with 0.02 M HCl; (b) anion-exchange resin AG 1X8 to remove P and S MC-ICP-MS Sample dissolution scheme devised to prevent B fractionation. Separation method fine-tuned to composition of glass samples. NIST SRM 610 (glass) used for validation. Mass bias correction using Li internal standard and sample-standard bracketing. Uncertainty of δ11B values was 1.6‰ (k = 2) 377
B Tourmaline and carbonate Tourmaline: alkaline fusion with K2CO3 and residue dissolved in HCl; dissolution in HCl for carbonate. Three-step column separation: (a) mixed cation–anion resin to remove major cations; (b) B-specific resin Amberlite IRA 743; (c) mixed cation–anion resin to convert acidic solution to neutral (only required for comparison between TIMS and ICP-MS). >98% recovery of B from each column MC-ICP-MS and TIMS Final eluent split into two parts, one for TIMS after addition of CsOH, the other for ICP-MS after adding high purity HNO3. B blank 0.50 ± 0.04 ng (2 SD). Using NIST SRM 951 (boric acid solution), 11B/10B external precision was ±0.09‰ (n = 10) for TIMS and 0.11‰ (n = 100) for MC-ICP-MS. In latter method, mass bias correction with sample-standard bracketing procedure plus blank correction for B memory 363
B Geological RMs Digested with HF–HNO3 and mannitol at 80 °C for 3 days; taken to dryness at 65 °C; HNO3 added and heated at 80 °C for 4 h. Solution centrifuged to separate supernatant, doping with NaCl before B separated using modified micro-sublimation technique MC-ICP-MS B blank ∼20 ng. Mass bias corrected by sample-standard bracketing procedure plus blank correction for B memory. Using NIST SRM 951 (boric acid solution) 11B/10B external precision was ±0.3‰ (2SD, N = 8) 362
Ba Geological RMs Digestion with HClO4–HF (1 + 4), followed by HClO4–HCl (1 + 4), then HCl alone, with final uptake in 2.5 M HCl. Separation by cation-exchange chromatography on AG50W-X8 MC-ICP-MS Ba blank <13 pg. Method based on 130Ba–135Ba double-spike, sample-standard bracketing protocol. Instrumental setup for low oxide ratios: BaO/Ba <0.1%. Ba ratio in double spike determined using an iterative calibration method developed in this study. Reproducibilities about 5× better than previous study 378
Ca Terrestrial and meteoritic samples Digested in HF–HNO3 at 130 °C for 4 days; dried and redissolved in 6 N HCl; dried and redissolved in 0.5 N HNO3 and centrifuged. Three-step separation: (a) Ca Separated from sample matrix using Eichrom DGA extraction chromatography resin (b) second pass through DGA resin; (c) Ca Separated from Sr using Sr-specific resin. Combined Ca yield was >98% MC-ICP-MS Total procedural blanks <1 ng Ca. Ti interferences were too large to obtain precise data for 46Ca and 48Ca. Mass bias corrected using sample standard bracketing protocol with NIST SRM 915b (calcium carbonate) and resulting data normalised to SRM 915a 379
Cu, Fe Igneous rocks Digested in HF–HNO3 at 160 °C; dried residues refluxed with HNO3–HCl and dried at 80 °C; refluxed with HNO3 and dried residues taken up in HCl plus a trace of HsOs. One-step anion exchange chromatography on bio-Rad AG-MP-1M used to separate Cu and Fe, unlike previous methods which required different schemes for the two analytes MC-ICP-MS Procedural blanks 1–2 ng Cu and 2–10 ng Fe. Cu isotopes measured in low resolution mode and Fe ratios in high resolution mode using sample standard bracketing. Once issues of incomplete recovery, mismatch in acid molarity and concentration between standards and samples, and isobaric interferences from matrix elements had been addressed, long term precision better than 0.05‰ (2 SD) for δ65Cu and δ56Fe obtained 380
Cu, Sb Ancient glass Modified preparation protocol to obtain Cu and Sb from the same digest. HF–HNO3 at 110 °C for 2 d; dried and redissolved in aqua regia; dried and redissolved in 0.14 M HF and used directly for Sb isotope measurements; an aliquot evaporated and redissolved in 8 M HCl for Cu isotope ratios. Various separation protocols based on AG MP-1 anion-exchange resin evaluated for Cu; Sb purified by cation-exchange chromatography MC-ICP-MS Recoveries from anion-exchange 100 ± 5% for Cu and >94% for Sb. Sb A small amount of Co was co-eluted with Cu but did not affect accuracy. Samples analysed using a sample standard bracketing protocol; Zn and In added as internal standards for Cu and Sb respectively. Revised Russell's law used to correct Cu and Sb for instrumental mass fractionation 381
Hf Ilmenite and rutile (Ti-rich minerals) Mixed acid HF initial digestion, then with HCl, take up in HCl with trace of HF. Separation of Hf from high TiO2 content by 3 column chemistry: (a) Fe And REEs elimination on AG50W-X8 resin; (b) elimination of most of Ti using AG1-X8 resin; (c) HClO4 evaporation (3 times) before successful separation of remaining Ti from Hf and Zr on AG50W-X8 cation-exchange resin MC-ICP-MS Hf and Lu concentrations measured by SF-ICP-MS. Corrections for isobaric interferences on 176Hf made using natural abundances of Lu and Yb isotopes and by measuring 172Yb and 175Lu, which were corrected for mass bias using 179Hf/177Hf. JMC-475 Hf reference solution used to bracket every 2 samples. Modified column chemistry improved yields from 2–5% to 78–100% for ilmenite compared to previous studies 382
Lu Rocks and minerals HF–HNO3 digestion, then conc HNO3 (3 times), then 6 M HCl before take up in HCl. Separation of Lu in 4 steps using 3 columns: (a) separation Of Fe and U using anion-exchange chromatography; (b) separation Of heavy REEs on Ln-Spec resin; (c) separation Of Lu from Yb using a longer column containing finer-grained Ln-Spec resin; (d) repeat Of step (c) to minimise amount of Yb in Lu fraction MC-ICP-MS All standards and samples spiked with W metal and normalised to the nominal W isotopic composition to correct for drift and instability. Mass bias corrected by normalisation to the Ames Lu standard. After correction for isobaric interferences, particularly 176Yb, precision on 176Lu/175Lu was close to their target value of 0.1‰. Use of NIST 3130a (Lu solution) as bracketing standard was proposed 383
Nd Geological RMs HF–HNO3–HClO4 digestion, residue dissolved in HCl. REEs separated on cation-exchange resin AG50W-X8; no chemical separation of Sm from Nd or addition of enriched isotope spikes. Method may need further validation for geological samples containing significant amounts of refractory minerals MC-ICP-MS Blank <0.1 ng for Sm and Nd. Isobaric interferences on Nd isotopes were reassessed. Sm interference on 144Nd corrected using the exponential law and selected Sm isotopic compositions. Sm/Nd ratios agreed well with previous values when sample bracketed with matrix-matched secondary standards. Four USGS RMs (2 basalts, an andesite and a rhyolite) used for method validation 384
Nd Geological materials HF–HNO3 digestion, then concentrated HNO3, and final take up in HCl. Separation by two column chromatography: strong cation resin, AG50W-X12, to separate the REEs, then Nd purified on Ln resin treated with HDEHP MC-ICP-MS Careful control of conditions for separation by gave Nd recoveries close to 100%; Sm and Ce removed to the extent that the interferences could be corrected effectively. Precisions comparable and Nd isotope data identical within analytical error to those obtained the double spike method. Validation on range of rock RMs including granites 385
Ni Geological materials Initial digestion: Silicates HF–HNO3 (1 + 3), non-silicates HNO3–HCl (1 + 1); dried and redissolved in HNO3–HCl; final takeup in HCl with a trace of H2O2. Two-step column separation: (a) anion-exchange on AG1-X8, addition of Ni double-spike, then (b) Ni-specific resin MC-ICP-MS Procedural blanks 3–4 ng Ni. Double-spike correction scheme presented. Interference correction for 58Fe isobar on 58Ni; Cu isotopes used to correct for instrumental mass bias. Precision of ±0.02–0.04‰ (2SE) for δ56Ni/58Ni 386
Pb–U Carbonates Sample dissolved in HNO3, dried and redissolved in acetic acid ready for a new separation protocol based on AG 1-X8 anion-exchange resin. A mobile phase of 90% acetic acid was used to elute the matrix components before Pb, Th and U were eluted with 2% HNO3 MC-ICP-MS Blanks of 6.4 pg Pb, 1.8 pg Th and 8.4 pg U were attained if the acetic acid was purified prior to use in separations; Pb blank still the major factor limiting the analytical precision. Method sufficiently free of matrix-induced instrumental biases to be appropriate for U–Th–Pb chronology. Method validation by analysis of speleothem 387
Pt Geological RMs Addition of 196Pt–198Pt spike prior to digestion by NiS fire assay procedure and separation by anion-exchange chromatography on AG1-X8 resin MC-ICP-MS At least 90–95% Pt recovered from column chemistry. Blanks typically 0.5–2 ng. Precision ±0.040 (2 SD) for δ198Pt in solution RM but poorer (e.g. ±0.088, 2 SD) for rock RMs 388
S Uranium ore concentrates Sample powders leached with ultra-pure water for 24 h at room temperature to obtain leachable sulfate. Sulfate separated from other anions using anion-exchange resin AG 1-X4 MC-ICP-MS CRMs IAEA-S-2, IAEA-S-3, IAEA-S-4 used for method validation. Matching of sample matrix to that of bracketing standard was necessary to obtain accurate results. δ34S uncertainty 0.45–1.9‰ (k = 2) 389
Sb Roman glass Digested with HF–HNO3 at 110 °C for 2 days; taken to dryness at 70 °C; aqua regia added and heated at 110 °C for 2 days; evaporated at 90 °C and residue redissolved in 0.14 M HF. Two-step column separation: (a) separation Of Sb from major cations using AG50-X8; (b) purification Of Sb on weak anion-exchange resin Amberlite IRA 743 MC-ICP-MS NIST SRM 610 (glass) used for validation (see ref. 377). Better precision obtained when mass bias corrected using “revised Russell's law” compared to sample standard bracketing procedure. External precision of 123Sb/121Sb ratio in glass was ca. 0.4ε 390
Se Organic-rich shales Digestion with HF–HNO3–HClO4 at 130 °C for 2 days; excess acid evaporated to incipient dryness; 6 M HCl added to reduce SeVI to SeIV; insoluble fluorides removed by centrifugation. Se purified using thiol-impregnated cotton fibre. Aqua regia treatment after column extraction to reduce Ge content and organic compounds Quadrupole ICP-MS Precision better than 0.2‰ for most Se ratios. Mass bias corrected using sample standard bracketing with NIST SRM 3149 (Se solution). Concentration of Se in standards and samples needed to be matched to within 5% to minimise the impact of isobaric interferences 391
Te Au–Ag telluride ores Digestion in aqua regia at 80 °C overnight, evaporated to incipient dryness and dissolved in 2 N HCl. Isolation of Te from matrix elements, particularly ag, by anion-exchange chromatography on AG 1-X8 resin with ca. 96% yield MC-ICP-MS Cadmium used to correct for mass bias. Precision was ±0.10‰ for 130Te/125Te under wet plasma conditions 392
Th–U Carbonates Dissolution in HNO3, addition of 229Th–236U spike, and UTEVA extraction chromatography to separate Th and U from matrix elements. Up to 24 samples could be processed simultaneously MC-ICP-MS Sample standard bracketing routine plus double spike to correct for instrumental mass bias. Development of open source algorithm to process U and Th data and calculate an accurate age and uncertainty propagation. Technique validated by replicating U–Th ages in speleothem 393


Various methods of correcting for mass discrimination394 were assessed for two target elements, one in the low mass region (B) and one in the medium mass region (Sb). Using synthetic solutions containing Be, Cs, Be + Cs, or Fe, the performance of the correction protocols in the presence of matrix elements was also evaluated. For B, all approaches to mass bias correction produced data of similar quality, with standard-sample bracketing giving slightly better precision, but for Sb common analyte internal standardisation and the revised Russell's law provided better precision and accuracy.

A compilation395 of Ca isotope data in over 70 published studies provided a fascinating insight into our current understanding of the global biogeochemical cycle of Ca and the utility of Ca isotopes as a proxy for examining the Earth's history. It included a description of determining Ca isotope ratios by TIMS and MC-ICP-MS, highlighting the analytical challenges in their measurement and inconsistencies in the way external reproducibilities were reported. When the data were converted to a single reference scale based on NIST SRM 915a (artificial carbonate), a significant difference between δ44Ca in carbonate (0.60‰) and silicate (0.94‰) samples was demonstrated. A new method379 for determining Ca isotope ratios by MC-ICP-MS with sufficient precision to explore genetic links between Earth and meteorites is included in Table 5.

Accurate measurements of boron concentrations and isotope ratios by ICP-MS depend on minimising losses and isotope fractionation during sample digestion and any subsequent manipulation of the samples. Mannitol is often added to an acid digest362,377 to complex B but this does not always completely suppress B volatilisation. In an alternative strategy396 for determining B concentrations by ID quadrupole ICP-MS, rock powders were spiked with 10B-enriched NIST SRM 952 (enriched boric acid) before dissolution in a slight excess of HF on a hot plate at 65–70 °C for up to 72 h. After centrifugation, the supernatant in ca. 0.3 M HF was analysed directly using a PFA inert introduction kit to reduce memory effects and contributions to the blank from contact with borosilicate glass. This ID procedure had a very low blank of <0.5 ng B so was particularly suitable for samples with low B contents. An improved procedure397 for the measurement of B/Ca ratios in foraminifera by HR-ICP-MS had a B/Ca blank of 2.0 ± 1.0 μmol mol−1, an external precision of ≤4.0% (2σ) and the capability of analysing 60 samples a day, making it well suited for routine measurements in paleoclimatic studies.

The precisions obtained for strontium isotope ratios in geological materials by MC-ICP-MS now rival those achieved by TIMS using a 84Sr–87Sr spike, as demonstrated by Ma et al.398 who improved the stability of the instrumental mass discrimination by carefully controlling carryover on a MC-ICP-MS instrument by using a vigorous in-run washing procedure to reduce memory effects. The reported precision of ±0.010–0.014‰ for δ88Sr/86Sr was 2–3 times better than previously published data obtained by MC-ICP-MS without spiking. In a study399 on the effect of high barium concentrations on the accuracy and precision of Sr isotope measurements, the measured Sr isotopic composition became inaccurate when the Ba concentration in the sample solution exceeded 1 ppm. This effect was related to matrix-dependent changes in mass discrimination processes. Consequently, a 125 μL rather than a 1 mL column volume was chosen for extraction chromatography with Eichrom Sr Spec resin. The Ba was washed from the column with 8 M HNO3 before Sr was collected. The modified method was successfully employed for the measurement of 88Sr/86Sr and 88Sr/87Sr in barite and seawater. A concentration gradient method400 for improving the precision of isotope ratio data obtainable by quadrupole ICP-MS was demonstrated for Pb and Sr. In this method, the isotopes of interest were measured, in TRA mode, in a series of sample solutions spiked with different amounts of the analyte, i.e. 50, 40, 30, 20, 10 and 0 μg L−1. The sample sequence was designed to ensure a very high repeatability and minimised the number of rinsing steps to achieve the best plasma stability. The resulting signal intensities for each isotope were plotted against each other and the slope of the regression line was, by definition, the isotope ratio. Nine measurements of J. P. Baker standard solution yielded a mean δ87Sr/86Sr of −3.23‰ with a measurement uncertainty of ±0.21‰.

Investigations into interferences from titanium and chromium species on Cu isotope measurements401 by MC-ICP-MS showed that artificial solutions designed to mimic the Cr[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]Cu[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]Ti ratios of sediment samples after anion-exchange chromatography did not behave in the same manner. For example, 67Zn/68Zn proved to be the most appropriate Zn isotope ratio for mass bias corrections in the artificial solutions but caused the largest error in ô65Cu when used for external normalisation in real samples. It also proved difficult to predict formation of Cr and Ti polyatomic species in the plasma as it varied with sample matrix. Consequently, optimal removal of Cr and Ti by a two-step chromatographic purification plus rigorous monitoring of six Zn isotope ratios to verify the absence of spectral interferences were recommended for the determination of accurate Cu isotope ratios in sediments. A study402 of potential factors affecting the accuracy and precision of Mg isotope ratios by MC-ICP-MS indicated that the presence of matrix elements and mismatches between the Mg concentration and acid strength in samples and standards could result in analytical artefacts that were comparable in size to the total magnitude of the variation of Mg isotope ratios in silicate rocks. Possible mechanisms for effects observed, which varied considerably for different instruments, were discussed in detail.

The performance characteristics of tandem quadrupole ICP-MS with collision-reaction cell technology were demonstrated in the determination of very low 236U/238U ratios.403 Peak tailing of the major 238U on the 236U peak was reduced to ca. 10−10 and the interference of 235UH+ on 236U was effectively reduced to a ratio of 1 × 10−8 by reaction of 235UH+ with oxygen in the collision-reaction cell. The 236U/238U ratios, measured as 236U16O+/238U16O+, were determined in the range 10−7 to 10−9 using Tl to correct for mass bias but without correction for spectral interferences. Although the procedure was validated using synthetic solutions and seawater, it is evident that this relatively simple and rapid technique could be applied to various environmental samples for the monitoring of radioactive contamination arising from nuclear waste.

Although ICP-MS offers multi-element analysis of geological materials on a routine basis, improved protocols are still sought for some elements, particularly the PGEs. The Se and Te contents of nine RMs and 79 other geological materials, covering a wide range of compositions, were measured to provide a better understanding of the relationship between Se and Te in the geological environment.404 After acid digestion, thiol cotton fibre was used to separate Se from samples containing high concentrations of interfering elements. The LODs by quadrupole ICP-MS were 0.02 and 0.005 μg g−1 for Se and Te, respectively. A single acid digest obtained by high pressure ashing was used405 to determine both the Ir, Pd, Pt, Re, Ru, S, Se and Te abundances in 18 geological RMs by ID-SF-ICP-MS and the Os isotopes by NTIMS. The PGEs were separated using 50W-X8 cation-exchange resin, a two-step ion-exchange chromatography method being needed to separate S, Se and Te from the matrix elements. Unsurprisingly, the measured PGE concentrations in most RMs were highly variable as the test portions taken were 1 g or less. In contrast, good precisions (<5% RSD) were obtained for S, Se and Te. Another procedure406 for the measurement of PGEs by ID-ICP-MS and Os–Re isotopes by NTIMS involved an inverse aqua regia digest of 1–2 g of sample powder in a Carius tube with 99Ru, 105Pd, 185Re, 190Os, 191Ir and 194Pt spikes. Osmium was separated by CCl4 solvent extraction before a two-stage column separation involving cation-exchange on AG50W-X8 followed by purification of PGE-Re using BPHA extraction resin. Although the PGE-Re concentration and Os isotope data for the four CRMs analysed agreed well with published data, nugget effects were evident in some of the data. The importance of sampling, nugget effects and analytical methodologies were highlighted in a study407 of siderophile element abundances across the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary. New PGE data for 113 samples from 38 sections across this boundary worldwide were obtained by quadrupole ICP-MS after nickel sulfide fire assay.

4.4.3 Other mass spectrometric techniques.
4.4.3.1 Thermal ionisation mass spectrometry. Many of the recent developments in TIMS measurements of isotope ratios in geological materials have concerned improved methods of purification of the element of interest combined with modifications in the measurement strategy. This information is summarised in Table 7.
Table 7 Methods used in the determination of isotope ratios in geological materials by TIMS
Analyte Matrix Sample treatment Detector Comments References
B Biogenic carbonates Dissolution in 1.7 N HCL to give ca. 750 ppb B In solution. Separation of B using improved micro-sublimation method at 70–74 °C for 12 h NTIMS Total evaporation method on a Re filament, with a sample size of <1 ng B, with normalisation to NIST SRM 951a (boric acid). Reproducibility better than 1.4‰ (2 SD, n > 10) was achieved for standards with a range of B isotope ratios. Analysis of NIST SRM 951 (boric acid) gave a mean value for 11B/10B = 4.0328 ± 0.0054 (2 SD, n = 25) 408
B Foraminifera (and seawater) Organic materials oxidised before dissolution. Two-step chromatographic separation: (a) Amberlite IRA 743 B-selective resin; (b) mixed ion-exchange resin, followed by micro-sublimation TIMS Static multicollector method using Cs2BO2+ ions and custom designed arrangement of Faraday collectors, with graphite loading onto Ta filaments. Typical blank <20 pg B. Repeated analyses of 25 ng B of NIST SRM 951 (boric acid) gave a mean value for 11B/10B = 4.05229 ± 0.00028 (n = 36) 409
B Tourmaline and carbonate Tourmaline: alkaline fusion with K2CO3 and residue dissolved in HCl. Dissolution in HCl for carbonate. Three-step column separation: (a) mixed cation–anion resin to remove major cations; (b) B-specific resin Amberlite IRA 743; (c) mixed cation–anion resin to convert acidic solution to neutral (only required for comparison between TIMS and ICP-MS). >98% recovery of B from each column TIMS and MC-ICP-MS Final eluent split into two parts, one for TIMS after addition of CsOH, the other for ICP-MS after adding high purity HNO3. B Blank 0.50 ± 0.04 ng (2 SD). Using NIST SRM 951 (boric acid solution), 11B/10B external precision was ±0.09‰ (n = 10) for TIMS and 0.11‰ (n = 100) for MC-ICP-MS. In latter method, mass bias correction with sample-standard bracketing procedure plus blank correction for B memory 363
Nd Coral Extensive physical cleaning, digested in 8 M HNO3, then refluxed in aqua regia to destroy organic compounds. Final solution in HNO3 spiked with 150Nd. Two-step column chemistry: (a) Eichrom RE resin to separate REEs from sample matrix; (b) Ln resin to separate Nd from rest of REEs. Blanks <5 pg Nd TIMS Nd measured as NdO+; best loading technique for generating high and stable Nd ion beam intensities was to use a micro-loading technique and TaF5 activator on single W filaments. External reproducibility of ±16 ppm (2 SD) demonstrated on 10 ng and 30 ng Nd loads isolated from USGS RM BCR-2 (basalt) and an in-house coral RM 410
Nd, Sm Ultramafic rocks Digestion with HF + HNO3 + HClO4, then HClO4 at 190–200 °C to digest chromite; H3BO3 dissolution of fluorides. REEs separated using cation-exchange chromatography, Sm and Nd separated on Ln columns TIMS Nd isotopes determined as NdO+, Sm isotopes as Sm+, both with very high sensitivity using single W filaments with TaF5 as an ion emitter. Sm/Nd concs as well. No Fe(OH)3 precipitation step required 411
Os Geological materials Method development carried out using two RM solutions; Durham Romil Os standard (IAGeo limited) and University of Maryland Johnson Matthey Os standard NTIMS Static collection of OsO3 using Faraday cups and amplifiers fitted with 1012 Ω resistors. For sample loads as small as 0.025 ng Os, isotope data with precisions of 0.1% or better were obtained 412
Pb Baddeleyite (ZrO2) Selected mineral grains cleaned in 4 N HNO3. No other preparation required. Procedural blanks <1 pg Pb TIMS Grains were embedded in silica glass on rhenium filaments. Thermal extraction TIMS method employed, with collection of Pb isotope signals in static multi-collector mode when the temperature of the filament was between 1530 and 1580 °C. The accuracy and precision of 207Pb/206Pb ages obtained were comparable with U–Pb ages obtained by conventional methods 413
Sr Geological materials A 84Sr–87Sr double spike added prior to separation of Sr from major cations in CaCO3 and silicate samples on Eichrom Sr-specific resin. Total blank <0.2 ng Sr TIMS Double spike calibration routine and algorithm described, together with data reduction method based a user-friendly computer programme developed specifically for Sr double spike. External precision for δ88Sr better than 0.02‰ (1 SD). Sr isotope data reported for several carbonate, phosphate and silicate USGS RMs 414
Te Rocks and carbonaceous chondrites Dissolution in HF + HNO3, take up in HCl. Three-step column chemistry: (a) AG1-X8 resin to remove major elements; (b) TRU-Spec resin to separate Te from Sn; (c) AG1-X8 resin to remove organic matter derived from TRU-Spec resin. Yield of 98% Te reported NTIMS Optimum analytical conditions for a strong Te ion beam obtained with a zone-refined Re single filament and Ba(OH)2 activator. Reproducibilities of Te isotope ratios obtained by static multicollection using Faraday cups comparable to those in previous studies by MC-ICP-MS 415


A significant instrumental advance was the development of new 1013 Ω resistors,416 which theoretically have 10-times lower noise levels than the 1011 Ω resistors normally fitted in the feedback loop of Faraday cup amplifiers in TIMS instruments. Their improved performance was demonstrated by measuring Nd and Sr isotope ratios in samples containing 10 and 100 pg of these elements. Variations in the fourth decimal place of 143Nd/144Nd and 87Sr/88Sr ratios could be resolved provided the procedural blanks and chemical separation were optimal.

Measurements by TIMS and MC-ICP-MS were both addressed in a review364 of methods for the determination of B isotopes and their application in various branches of geochemistry. In a new approach408 to the analysis of carbonate materials for B isotopes by total evaporation TIMS, a micro-sublimation device was developed in which 20 samples could be processed simultaneously. Quantitative recovery of B and low blanks, with separation from major elements and organic matter, were achieved without chromatographic separations or treatment with H2O2. Boron isotope data for a range of environmental samples, including foraminifera, were measured using a modified TIMS procedure409 based on static multicollection of Cs2BO2+ ions.

Lehn et al.417 discussed their current best practices for measuring δ44Ca/40Ca by MC-TIMS. These included the addition of a 43Ca–42Ca double spike to the sample prior to purification and optimising the technique using a Monte Carlo error model. Improvements in their experimental protocol eliminated drift within a measurement session and the resultant external precision for δ44Ca/40Ca was ±0.041‰ (2 SD).

Three different measurement protocols for the TIMS determination of the absolute abundance of40K were tested418 on two NIST KCl SRMs (918b and 985). All the results agreed with the terrestrial 40K/39K value suggested by IUPAC but had better precisions. An amplifier configuration that used 1010, 1011 and 1012 Ω resistors on the three Faradays cups provided the most accurate results. The new data provided by this study will serve to reduce the uncertainty of K–Ar ages measured on geological materials.


4.4.3.2 Secondary ion mass spectrometry. There is much interest currently in the use of SIMS to make accurate, high precision measurements of oxygen isotopes in a variety of matrices. For example, it was possible to resolve subtle intragrain variations of δ18O in titanite419 by SIMS at the 10 μm scale. By careful comparison of microstructural and compositional data, patterns of δ18O zoning were shown to reflect processes such as diffusion, recrystallisation and crystal growth. Spot-to-spot precision for 18O/16O SIMS measurements in Ca–Mg–Fe garnet grains420 was ± 0.2‰ (2 s) or better, as expected from consideration of shot noise and Faraday detector noise. The uncertainties due to spot-to-spot repeatability were of a similar magnitude to the uncertainties associated with matrix corrections and uncertainties in the RM values which, in some cases, dominated the uncertainty budget.

The high spatial resolution of SIMS makes it suitable for probing fine growth structures in biogenic carbonates, such as foraminifera and corals skeletons, and inferring past climate conditions from their geochemistry. Scanning white light interferometry was used to determine the dimensions and volumes of craters produced by SIMS analysis of the skeleton of an aragonitic coral421 during the measurement of δ11B, δ13C and δ18O. Crater widths ranged from ca. 17 μm (δ13C) to ca. 36 μm (δ11B), and their depths from ≤3 μm (δ18O) to >20 μm (δ11B). These dimensions may be significant compared to accretion rates in some biogenic carbonates if the organisms grow slowly. In a comparison422 of the performance of SIMS and nano-SIMS for the measurement of Mg/Ca, Sr/Ca and Ba/Ca ratios in carbonates, the internal variability of <1% on both machines was dominated by counting statistics. However, not all of the nine carbonate RMs examined were homogeneous enough within individual crystals to be used to monitor the accuracy and precision of the data. In general, matching the element:Ca ratios of the standards with those of the sample was not as important as finding homogeneous materials for calibration. It was concluded that independent measurements, e.g. by ID-ICP-MS, were required for most of the standards tested, even if they were from the same batch. In a study423 of C and H stable isotopes in the rare carbonate minerals malachite and stichtite, SIMS data were corrected for instrumental mass fractionation using whole rock compositions determined by traditional stable isotope analysis. It was shown to be a viable strategy for data correction when well characterised RMs were not available for microanalytical calibration.

Time-of-flight SIMS has become a very popular technique for obtaining well-resolved 2D and 3D elemental and isotopic maps. It also has the potential to determine parameters that control the surface reactivity of minerals and thus their behaviour during mineral beneficiation by froth flotation. A review424 of research relevant to this application (73 references) examined the capacity of TOF-SIMS to provide reliable surface chemical data for evaluating factors controlling stream partitioning in various mineral flotation processes. A novel mode of TOF-SIMS operation for improved accuracy and lateral resolution of oxygen isotope measurements was devised425,426 for measuring oxygen diffusion coefficients in industrial oxides; this may become relevant to geochemical applications in the future.

A study427 of zircons with high U contents demonstrated that when zircons with extreme radiation damage were analysed by SIMS, an apparent increase in U–Pb age and a real decrease in δ18O were observed. Potential mechanisms for this behaviour were proposed along with strategies for zircon selection.


4.4.3.3 Accelerator mass spectrometry. A noteworthy review428of major developments in AMS over the last 25 years identified key advances during this period (285 references). One of the most remarkable advances has been the development of small AMS machines and their role in establishing AMS facilities worldwide. The main nuclides used in geological applications, 10Be, 14C, 26Al and 36Cl, were discussed in relation to AMS instrumentation, cosmogenic nuclide production rates, methods of surface exposure dating, measurement of erosion and weathering, burial dating and meteoric 10Be. A critical comparison149 of analytical techniques for the determination of 129I (85 references) concluded that AMS is the most sensitive method available. Because of the significant increase in the number of AMS facilities over the last ten years, combined with the reduction in costs and its superior detection capabilities, AMS replaced NAA as the most popular method for the measurement of 129I from the year 2000 onwards. Progress in chemical separation and purification of 129I for its detection at very low concentrations by AMS has been a critical factor in expanding the number of applications of 129I data in environmental and geological research, including its use in the investigation of radioactive contamination from the Fukushima incident.

For measurements of10Be by AMS, a carrier solution containing stable 9Be is normally added prior to radiochemical separation of 10Be to enhance the amount of 9Be in the final BeO target. Because the levels of 10Be are too high in commercial 9Be solutions, Merchel et al.429 prepared a 9Be solution from phenakite (Be2SiO4), containing very low concentrations of 10Be. In a round-robin exercise to establish an accurate 9Be value for this solution, it was evident that even nowadays the determination of 9Be can be challenging: the preliminary data reported had a SD of ca. 8%! As the accuracy of 10Be data is dependent on that of the 9Be concentration, it was recommended that all AMS laboratories using in-house 9Be-carrier solutions should have them analysed by at least one independent laboratory. Regular participation in 9Be inter-laboratory comparisons was also advocated.

4.4.4 X-ray techniques. For up-to-date information on instrumental developments and applications of X-ray techniques, readers should consult the ASU review on XRF5 whose sections covering geological and related applications are substantial.

Synchrotron XRF microscopy was employed for elemental mapping of carbonaceous chondrites.430 Data were collected using a 2 μm spot size at very low dwell times (0.1–0.5 ms), resulting in maps of entire thin sections in approximately 5 h. The penetration of the X-ray beams and characteristic lines of fluoresced elements enabled structures at depth to be detected and imaged at full resolution. In a study431 of the properties of argillaceous rocks and their suitability for the disposal of radioactive waste, elemental mapping with synchrotron μ-XRF was used to identify the main mineral groups responsible for the uptake of different metal ions by clay-rich rocks. Multivariate methods were found to be efficient tools for extracting information from the elemental maps for the clay matrix and fracture infill regions. By using positive matrix factorisation as a new approach, the factors with higher sorption capacity could be identified and, together with additional mineralogical information, the uptake capacity of different mineral phases could be quantified.

Sulfide- and oxide-bearing RMs were mapped using EDXRF to provide spatial information on the heterogeneity of RMs.432 The RM powders were prepared as XRF pellets and a simple mathematic approach was proposed for characterising their spatial geochemistry and the magnitude of heterogeneities. This approach could be used to estimate the minimum mass that should be taken as an analytical test portion relative to the precision, and would also be useful in the preparation of RMs.

5 Glossary of terms

2DTwo-dimensional
3DThree-dimensional
AASAtomic absorption spectrometry
AECAnion exchange chromatography
AESAtomic emission spectrometry
AFSAtomic fluorescence spectrometry
AMSAccelerator mass spectrometry
APDCAmmonium pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate
ASUAtomic Spectrometry Update
BCRCommunity Bureau of Reference (of the European Community) now IRMM
BECBackground equivalent concentration
BPHA N-Benzoyl-N-phenylhydroxylamine
CANMETNational Resources Canada
CCDCharge coupled detector
CCPCapacitively coupled plasma
CECapillary electrophoresis
CIConfidence interval
CNTCarbon nanotube
CPECloud point extraction
CRMCertified reference material
CSContinuum source
CVCold vapour
CVAASCold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry
CVGChemical vapour generation
DCMDichloromethane
DGTDiffusion gradient in thin films
DLLMEDispersive liquid–liquid micro-extraction
DMADimethylarsenic acid
DMGDimethylglyoxime
DMMEDual magnetic micro-extraction
DOMDissolved organic matter
DRCDynamic reaction cell
EDSEnergy dispersive spectrometry
EDTAEthyldiaminetetraacetic acid
EDXRFEnergy dispersive X-ray fluorescence
EGTAEthylene glycol tetra-acetic acid
EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency (USA)
EPMAElectron probe microanalysis
ERMEuropean Reference Material
ESI-MSElectrospray ionisation mass spectrometry
ETAASElectrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry
ETVElectrothermal vaporisation
EUEuropean Union
EXAFSExtended X-ray absorption fine structure
FAASFlame atomic absorption spectrometry
FEGField emission gun
FFFField flow fractionation
FIFlow injection
FPFundamental parameter
FTAFission track analysis
FTIRFourier transform infrared
GCGas chromatography
GDGlow discharge
GSJGeological Survey of Japan
GSRGun-shot residue
HCLHollow cathode lamp
HDEHPDi(2-ethylhexyl) orthophosphoric acid
HF-LPMEHollow fibre liquid phase micro-extraction
HGHydride generation
HgpParticulate phase mercury
HPLCHigh performance liquid chromatography
HPSHigh Purity Standards (USA)
HRHigh resolution
HSHead space
IAEAInternational Atomic Energy Agency
IAGInternational Association of Geoanalysts
IBAIon beam analysis
ICIon chromatography
ICPInductively coupled plasma
ICP-AESInductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry
ICP-MSInductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
IDIsotope dilution
IDAIsotope dilution analysis
IECIon exchange chromatography
IERMInstitute for Environmental Reference Materials (of Ministry of Environmental Protection, China)
ILIonic liquid
IL-MEIonic liquid micro-extraction
IRInfrared
IRMMInstitute for Reference Materials and Measurements
IRMSIsotope ratio mass spectrometry
ISEIon selective electrode
IUPACInternational Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry
LALaser ablation
LEDLight emitting diode
LGCLaboratory of the Government Chemist (UK)
LIBSLaser induced breakdown spectroscopy
LNEGNational Laboratory of Energy and Geology (Portugal)
LODLimit of detection
LOQLimit of quantification
LPMSLiquid phase micro-sublimation
MALDI-MSMatrix assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry
MCMulticollector
MFMetallic furnace
MIPMicrowave induced plasma
MMAMonomethylarsenic acid
MNPMagnetic nanoparticle
MPMicrowave plasma
MSMass spectrometry
MWCNTMultiwalled carbon nanotube
m/zMass to charge ratio
NAANeutron activation analysis
NASANational Aeronautics and Space Administration (USA)
NBSNational Bureau of Standards (USA) now known as NIST
NCSChina National Analysis Centre for Iron and Steel
Nd:YAGNeodymium doped:yttrium aluminum garnet
NIESNational Institute for Environmental Studies (Japan)
NISTNational Institute of Standards and Technology (USA)
NPNanoparticle
NRCCNational Research Council of Canada
NRCCRMNational Research Centre for Certified Reference Materials (China)
NTIMSNegative thermal ionisation mass spectrometry
NWRINational Water Research Institute (Canada)
OSILOcean Scientific International Ltd (UK)
PAGEPolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
PAHPolyaromatic hydrocarbons
PCAPrincipal component analysis
PFAPerfluoroalkyl
PGEPlatinum group element
PIXEParticle induced X-ray emission
PLSPartial least squares
PM1Particulate matter (with an aerodynamic diameter of up to 1 μm)
PM1–10Particulate matter (with an aerodynamic diameter of between 1 and 10 μm)
PM2.5Particulate matter (with an aerodynamic diameter of up to 2.5 μm)
PM10Particulate matter (with an aerodynamic diameter of up to 10 μm)
PpbPart per billion
PpmPart per million
PTFEPoly(tetrafluoroethylene)
PVGPhotochemical vapour generation
QCQuality control
REERare earth element
RIMSResonance ionisation mass spectrometry
RMReference material
RPReversed phase
rpmRevolutions per minute
RSDRelative standard deviation
SStandard deviation of sample
SCPSCP Science (Canada)
SCXStrong cation exchange
SDStandard deviation
SDSSodium dodecyl sulfate
SDMESingle drop micro-extraction
SEStandard error
SECSize exclusion chromatography
SEMScanning electron microscopy
SFSector field
SFODMESolidification of floating organic drop micro-extraction
SHRIMPSensitive high resolution ion microprobe
SILe Système International d'Unités (International System of Units)
SIMCASoft independent modelling of class analogy
SIMSSecondary ion mass spectrometry
SMPSScanning mobility particle sizer
S/NSignal-to-noise ratio
SPESolid phase extraction
SPSSpectrapure Standards (Norway)
SRSynchrotron radiation
SRMStandard reference material
SRXRFSynchrotron radiation X-ray fluorescence
SSSolid sampling
SSIDMSSpecies specific isotope dilution mass spectrometry
TDThermal desorption
TEMTransmission electron microscopy
TFFTangential flow filtration
TIMSThermal ionisation mass spectrometry
TMAHTetramethylammonium hydroxide
TOAThermal optical analysis
TOCTotal organic carbon
TOFTime of flight
TRATime resolved analysis
TS-FF-AASThermospray flame furnace atomic absorption spectrometry
TSPTotal suspended particles
TXRFTotal reflection X-ray fluorescence
UAUltrasonic extraction
UFUltrafiltration
UNEPUnited Nations Environment Programme
USAEMEUltrasound assisted emulsification extraction
USGSUnited States Geological Survey
USEUltrasound assisted emulsification
USEPAUnited States Environmental Protection Agency
USNUltrasonic nebuliser
UVUltra violet
UV-VisUltra violet-visible spectrophotometry
VAEVortex assisted emulsification
WDXRFWavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence
XAFSX-ray absorption fine structure spectrometry
XANESX-ray absorption near edge structure
XASX-ray absorption spectrometry
XPSX-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
XRDX-ray diffraction
XRFX-ray fluorescence

6 References

  1. O. T. Butler, W. R. L. Cairns, J. M. Cook and C. M. Davidson, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(1), 17–50 RSC.
  2. A. Taylor, M. P. Day, S. Hill, J. Marshall, M. Patriarca and M. White, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(3), 386–426 RSC.
  3. E. H. Evans, J. Pisonero, C. M. M. Smith and R. N. Taylor, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(5), 773–794 RSC.
  4. R. Clough, C. F. Harrington, S. J. Hill, Y. Madrid and J. F. Tyson, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(7), 1158–1196 RSC.
  5. M. West, A. T. Ellis, P. J. Potts, C. Streli, C. Vanhoof and P. Wobrauschek, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(9), 1516–1563 RSC.
  6. B. Gibson, S. Carter, A. S. Fisher, S. Lancaster, J. Marshall and I. Whiteside, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(11), 1969–2021 RSC.
  7. A. Hsu, A. Reuben, D. Shindell, A. de Sherbinin and M. Levy, Atmos. Environ., 2013, 80, 561–570 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. J. Engel-Cox, N. T. Kim Oanh, A. van Donkelaar, R. V. Martin and E. Zell, Atmos. Environ., 2013, 80, 584–590 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. N. Pirrone, W. Aas, S. Cinnirella, R. Ebinghaus, I. M. Hedgecock, J. Pacyna, F. Sprovieri and E. M. Sunderland, Atmos. Environ., 2013, 80, 599–611 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. B. Giechaskiel, M. Maricq, L. Ntziachristos, C. Dardiotis, X. Wang, H. Axmann, A. Bergmann and W. Schindler, J. Aerosol Sci., 2014, 67, 48–86 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. M. Rutkowska, K. Dubalska, G. Bajger-Nowak, P. Konieczka and J. Namiesnik, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2014, 44(6), 638–704 CrossRef CAS.
  12. D. Lack, H. Moosmüller, G. McMeeking, R. Chakrabarty and D. Baumgardner, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2014, 406(1), 99–122 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. T. Jabbar, G. Wallner and P. Steier, J. Environ. Radioact., 2013, 126, 45–54 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. J. Zheng, K. Tagami, S. Homma-Takeda and W. T. Bu, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(11), 1676–1699 RSC.
  15. Z. Yue, I. Hammad, T. Chuen-Jinn, H. Shao-Ming and C. Yung-Sung, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2014, 16(2), 203–210 Search PubMed.
  16. D. Leith, D. Miller-Lionberg, G. Casuccio, T. Lersch, H. Lentz, A. Marchese and J. Volckens, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 2014, 48(1), 81–89 CrossRef CAS.
  17. N. Neubauer, M. Seipenbusch and G. Kasper, Ann. Occup. Hyg., 2013, 57(7), 842–852 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. A. Bredberg, G. Ljungkvist, F. Taube, E. Ljungstrom, P. Larsson, E. Mirgorodskaya, C. Isaxon, A. Gudmundsson, N. Forsgard and A. C. Olin, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(4), 730–735 RSC.
  19. P. M. Felix, C. Franco, M. A. Barreiros, B. Batista, S. Bernardes, S. M. Garcia, A. B. Almeida, S. M. Almeida, H. T. Wolterbeek and T. Pinheiro, Arch. Environ. Occup. Health, 2013, 68(2), 72–79 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. M. A. Barreiros, T. Pinheiro, P. M. Felix, C. Franco, M. Santos, F. Araujo, M. C. Freitas and S. M. Almeida, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2013, 297(3), 377–382 CrossRef CAS.
  21. D. B. Wang, P. Pakbin, A. Saffari, M. M. Shafer, J. J. Schauer and C. Sioutas, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 2013, 47(11), 1226–1238 CrossRef CAS.
  22. K. A. Koehler and J. Volckens, Ann. Occup. Hyg., 2013, 57(9), 1138–1147 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. A. E. Perring, J. P. Schwarz, R. S. Gao, A. J. Heymsfield, C. G. Schmitt, M. Schnaiter and D. W. Fahey, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 2013, 47(10), 1066–1072 CrossRef CAS.
  24. M. Staymates, J. Bottiger, D. Schepers and J. Staymates, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 2013, 47(9), 945–954 CrossRef CAS.
  25. B. Jancsek-Turoczi, A. Hoffer, I. Nyiro-Kosa and A. Gelencser, J. Aerosol Sci., 2013, 65, 69–76 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  26. A. Katsoyiannis, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 2014, 14(4), 1102–1105 CAS.
  27. Q. Y. Cai, P. Y. Xiao, H. X. Lu, A. Katsoyiannis, J. J. Tian, Q. Y. Zeng and C. H. Mo, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 2014, 14(1), 431–439 CAS.
  28. X. W. Fu, L. E. Heimburger and J. E. Sonke, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(5), 841–852 RSC.
  29. W. Zhu, J. Sommar, Z. G. Li, X. B. Feng, C. J. Lin and G. H. Li, Atmos. Environ., 2013, 79, 540–545 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. H. Indresand, W. H. White, K. Trzepla and A. M. Dillner, X-Ray Spectrom., 2013, 42(5), 359–367 CrossRef CAS.
  31. M. Y. Jiang, Y. Nakamatsu, K. A. Jensen and S. Utsunomiya, Atmos. Environ., 2014, 82, 364–374 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  32. L. L. Yu, J. D. Fasset, B. D. MacDonald, T. A. Butler, D. M. Ramsey, R. J. Key-Schwartz and T. C. Rains, in Silica and Associated Respirable Mineral Particles, ed. M. Harper and T. Lee, ASTM International, West Conshohocken PA 19438-2959 USA, 2014, vol. STP 1565, pp. 222–231 Search PubMed.
  33. R. Jakopic, M. Sturm, M. Kraiem, S. Richter and Y. Aregbe, J. Environ. Radioact., 2013, 125, 17–22 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  34. D. Salcedo, J. P. Bernal, O. Perez-Arvizu and E. Lounejeva, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(4), 753–761 RSC.
  35. C. L. S. Wiseman and F. Zereini, Atmos. Environ., 2014, 89, 282–289 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  36. S. Canepari, F. Padella, M. L. Astolfi, E. Marconi and C. Perrino, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 2013, 13(6), 1619–1629 CAS.
  37. I. De La Calle, N. Cabaleiro, V. Romero, I. Lavilla and C. Bendicho, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 90, 23–54 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  38. R. Y. Sun, M. Enrico, L. E. Heimburger, C. Scott and J. E. Sonke, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2013, 405(21), 6771–6781 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  39. R. J. C. Brown, W. R. Webb and S. L. Goddard, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2014, 823, 20–24 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  40. B. Welz, M. G. R. Vale, E. R. Pereira, I. N. B. Castilho and M. B. Dessuy, J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 2014, 25(5), 799–821 CAS.
  41. M. Resano, M. R. Florez and E. Garcia-Ruiz, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2014, 406(9–10), 2239–2259 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  42. D. J. Butcher, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2013, 804, 1–15 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  43. F. V. Nakadi, L. R. Rosa and M. da Veiga, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 88, 80–84 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  44. A. A. Shaltout, B. Welz and I. N. B. Castilho, Atmos. Environ., 2013, 81, 18–24 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  45. B. Zhang, P. Xu, J. J. Ma, H. Wu, G. Q. Luo, M. H. Xu and H. Yao, Energy Fuels, 2014, 28(1), 192–198 CrossRef CAS.
  46. A. de Jesus, A. V. Zmozinski, M. A. Vieira, A. S. Ribeiro and M. M. da Silva, Microchem. J., 2013, 110, 227–232 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  47. L. Radziemski and D. Cremers, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 87, 3–10 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  48. R. Noll, C. Fricke-Begemann, M. Brunk, S. Connemann, C. Meinhardt, M. Scharun, V. Sturm, J. Makowe and C. Gehlen, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2014, 93, 41–51 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  49. Y. Shao, Y. B. Zhang, X. Gao, C. Du and J. Q. Lin, Spectrosc. Spectral Anal., 2013, 33(10), 2593–2598 CAS.
  50. Z. Z. Wang, Y. Deguchi, M. Kuwahara, X. B. Zhang, J. J. Yan and J. P. Liu, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 2013, 52(11), 6 Search PubMed.
  51. T. Ohno and Y. Muramatsu, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(2), 347–351 RSC.
  52. T. Ohno, Y. Muramatsu, Y. Shikamori, C. Toyama, N. Okabe and H. Matsuzaki, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(8), 1283–1287 RSC.
  53. Y. Y. Su, Z. M. Li, M. Li, X. W. Yi, G. Q. Zhou, J. Xu, L. H. Zhai, G. Y. Wei and F. R. Zhu, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 2014, 48(1), 99–107 CrossRef CAS.
  54. W. H. Hsu, S. J. Jiang and A. C. Sahayam, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2013, 794, 15–19 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  55. M. M. Lynam, B. Klaue, G. J. Keeler and J. D. Blum, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(11), 1788–1795 RSC.
  56. J. Y. Liu, K. E. Murphy, R. I. MacCuspie and M. R. Winchester, Anal. Chem., 2014, 86(7), 3405–3414 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  57. G. Cornelis and M. Hassellov, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(1), 134–144 RSC.
  58. J. Tuoriniemi, G. Cornelis and M. Hassellov, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(4), 743–752 RSC.
  59. M. Hadioui, C. Peyrot and K. J. Wilkinson, Anal. Chem., 2014, 86(10), 4668–4674 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  60. J. Koch, L. Flamigni, S. Gschwind, S. Allner, H. Longerich and D. Gunther, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(11), 1707–1717 RSC.
  61. C. R. Quetel, M. Zampella, R. J. C. Brown, H. Ent, M. Horvat, E. Paredes and M. Tunc, Anal. Chem., 2014, 86(15), 7819–7827 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  62. A. Bazzano and M. Grotti, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(5), 926–933 RSC.
  63. A. Hubert, F. Claverie, C. Pecheyran and F. Pointurier, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2014, 93, 52–60 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  64. H. A. Synal, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 2013, 349, 192–202 CrossRef PubMed.
  65. W. Kutschera, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 2013, 349, 203–218 CrossRef PubMed.
  66. J. Mabry, T. F. Lan, P. Burnard and B. Marty, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(12), 1903–1910 RSC.
  67. Y. Iwata, C. Ito, H. Harano and T. Iguchi, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 2014, 51(4), 465–475 CrossRef CAS.
  68. H. Kawashima and M. Murakami, Atmos. Environ., 2014, 89, 140–147 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  69. A. L. Faure, C. Rodriguez, O. Marie, J. Aupiais and F. Pointurier, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(1), 145–151 RSC.
  70. Y. Chen, Y. Shen, Z. Y. Chang, Y. G. Zhao, S. L. Guo, J. Y. Cui and Y. Liu, Radiat. Meas., 2013, 50, 43–45 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  71. A. K. Kennedy, D. A. Bostick, C. R. Hexel, R. R. Smith and J. M. Giaquinto, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2013, 296(2), 817–821 CrossRef CAS.
  72. C. G. Worley, L. Tandon, P. T. Martinez and D. L. Decker, Powder Diffr., 2013, 28(2), 127–131 CrossRef CAS.
  73. T. Okuda, E. Fujimori, K. Hatoya, H. Takada, H. Kumata, F. Nakajima, S. Hatakeyama, M. Uchida, S. Tanaka, K. B. He, Y. L. Ma and H. Haraguchi, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 2013, 13(6), 1864–1876 CAS.
  74. U. E. A. Fittschen, C. Streli, F. Meirer and M. Alfeld, X-Ray Spectrom., 2013, 42(5), 368–373 CrossRef CAS.
  75. M. Menzel and U. E. A. Fittschen, Anal. Chem., 2014, 86(6), 3053–3059 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  76. M. Mecchia, C. Pretorius, P. Stacey, M. Mattenklott and E. Incocciati, in Silica and Associated Mineral Particles, ed. M. Harper and T. Lee, ASTM International, West Conshohocken PA 19438-2959 USA, 2014, vol. STP 1565, pp. 139–168 Search PubMed.
  77. K. Sakata, A. Sakaguchi, M. Tanimizu, Y. Takaku, Y. Yokoyama and Y. Takahashi, J. Environ. Sci., 2014, 26(2), 343–352 CrossRef CAS.
  78. Y. Takahashi, T. Furukawa, Y. Kanai, M. Uematsu, G. Zheng and M. A. Marcus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2013, 13(15), 7695–7710 Search PubMed.
  79. W. J. Cheng, L. T. Weng, Y. J. Li, A. Lau, C. K. Chan and C. M. Chan, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 2013, 47(10), 1118–1124 CrossRef CAS.
  80. D. Atzei, M. Fantauzzi, A. Rossi, P. Fermo, A. Piazzalunga, G. Valli and R. Vecchi, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014, 307, 120–128 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  81. E. S. Izraeli, T. Tsach and N. Levin, X-Ray Spectrom., 2014, 43(1), 29–37 CrossRef CAS.
  82. F. S. Romolo, M. E. Christopher, M. Donghi, L. Ripani, C. Jeynes, R. P. Webb, N. I. Ward, K. J. Kirkby and M. J. Bailey, Forensic Sci. Int., 2013, 231(1–3), 219–228 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  83. J. French, R. Morgan and J. Davy, X-Ray Spectrom., 2014, 43(1), 56–61 CrossRef CAS.
  84. M. R. Heal, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2014, 406(1), 81–98 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  85. S. Ohata, N. Moteki, J. Schwarz, D. Fahey and Y. Kondo, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 2013, 47(10), 1073–1082 CrossRef CAS.
  86. A. Torres, T. C. Bond, C. M. B. Lehmann, R. Subramanian and O. L. Hadley, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 2014, 48(3), 239–250 CrossRef CAS.
  87. R. M. Harrison, D. C. S. Beddows, A. M. Jones, A. Calvo, C. Alves and C. Pio, Atmos. Environ., 2013, 80, 540–548 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  88. G. F. Shen, Y. C. Chen, S. Y. Wei, X. F. Fu, Y. Zhu and S. Tao, Atmos. Environ., 2013, 79, 79–84 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  89. Z. Ning, K. L. Chan, K. C. Wong, D. Westerdahl, G. Mocnik, J. H. Zhou and C. S. Cheung, Atmos. Environ., 2013, 80, 31–40 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  90. Y. H. Cheng and M. H. Lin, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 2013, 13(6), 1853–1863 Search PubMed.
  91. J. Cai, B. Z. Yan, J. Ross, D. N. Zhang, P. L. Kinney, M. S. Perzanowski, K. Jung, R. Miller and S. N. Chillrud, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 2014, 14(1), 1–9 CAS.
  92. D. M. Cate, P. Nanthasurasak, P. Riwkulkajorn, C. L'Orange, C. S. Henry and J. Volckens, Ann. Occup. Hyg., 2014, 58(4), 413–423 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  93. F. Pointurier and O. Marie, J. Raman Spectrosc., 2013, 44(12), 1753–1759 CrossRef CAS.
  94. E. Avzianova and S. D. Brooks, J. Aerosol Sci., 2014, 67, 207–214 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  95. C. H. Deng, S. D. Brooks, G. Vidaurre and D. C. O. Thornton, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 2014, 48(2), 193–206 CrossRef CAS.
  96. T. Catelani, G. Pratesi and M. Zoppi, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 2014, 48(1), 13–21 CrossRef CAS.
  97. C. Giorio, A. Tapparo, M. L. Scapellato, M. Carrieri, P. Apostoli and G. B. Bartolucci, J. Aerosol Sci., 2013, 65, 111–120 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  98. N. P. Skaugset, D. G. Ellingsen, H. Noto, L. Jordbekken and Y. Thomassen, Ann. Occup. Hyg., 2013, 57(8), 1054–1064 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  99. P. Stacey, M. Mecchia, S. Verpaele, C. Pretorius, R. Key-Schwartz, M. Mattenklott, C. Eypert-Blaison, A. Thorpe, P. Roberts and G. Frost, in Silica and Associated Respirable Mineral Particles, ed. M. Harper and T. Lee, ASTM International, West Conshohocken PA 19438-2959 USA, 2014, vol. STP 1565 Search PubMed.
  100. J. M. Harrington, C. M. Nelson, F. X. Weber, K. D. Bradham, K. E. Levine and J. Rice, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2014, 16(2), 256–261 CAS.
  101. A. L. Fabricius, L. Duester, B. Meermann and T. A. Ternes, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2014, 406(2), 467–479 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  102. S. Ozdemir, V. Okumus, A. Dundar and E. Kilinc, Microchim. Acta, 2013, 180(9–10), 719–739 CrossRef.
  103. W. A. W. Ibrahim, L. I. Abd Ali, A. Sulaiman, M. M. Sanagi and H. Y. Aboul-Enein, Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem., 2014, 44(3), 233–254 CrossRef PubMed.
  104. C. H. Latorre, J. B. Garcia, S. G. Martin and R. M. P. Crecente, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2013, 804, 37–49 CrossRef PubMed.
  105. K. Hagiwara, T. Inui, Y. Koike and T. Nakamura, Anal. Sci., 2013, 29(12), 1153–1158 CrossRef CAS.
  106. L. Elci, A. Elci, T. A. Berg and J. F. Tyson, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 2013, 93(10), 1065–1073 CrossRef CAS.
  107. E. Margui, M. Sague, I. Queralt and M. Hidalgo, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2013, 786, 8–15 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  108. K. C. Hsu, C. C. Sun, Y. C. Ling, S. J. Jiang and Y. L. Huang, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(8), 1320–1326 RSC.
  109. D. Baralkiewicz, B. Pikosz, M. Belter and M. Marcinkowska, Accredit. Qual. Assur., 2013, 18(5), 391–401 CrossRef CAS.
  110. X. P. Chen, C. Han, H. Y. Cheng, Y. C. Wang, J. H. Liu, Z. G. Xu and L. Hu, J. Chromatogr. A, 2013, 1314, 86–93 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  111. Y. Gao, S. De Craemer and W. Baeyens, Talanta, 2014, 120, 470–474 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  112. N. Kilibarda, S. E. Afton, J. M. Harrington, F. Yan and K. E. Levine, J. Chromatogr. A, 2013, 1304, 121–126 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  113. N. Garcia-Otero, M. C. Barciela-Alonso, P. Bermejo-Barrera, A. Moreda-Pineiro, M. S. Jimenez, M. T. Gomez and J. R. Castillo, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2013, 804, 59–65 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  114. N. Garcia-Otero, P. Herbello-Hermelo, R. Dominguez-Gonzalez, M. Aboal-Somoza, A. M. Pineiro and P. Bermejo-Barrera, Microchem. J., 2013, 110, 501–509 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  115. R. D. Holbrook, D. Motabar, O. Quifiones, B. Stanford, B. Vanderford and D. Moss, Environ. Pollut., 2013, 181, 68–74 CrossRef PubMed.
  116. T. E. A. Chalew, G. S. Ajmani, H. O. Huang and K. J. Schwab, Environ. Health Perspect., 2013, 121(10), 1161–1166 Search PubMed.
  117. M. P. Aliaga-Campuzano, J. P. Bernal, S. B. Briceno-Prieto, O. Perez-Arvizua and E. Lounejeva, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(7), 1102–1109 RSC.
  118. H. Pyhtila, M. Niemela, P. Peramaki, J. Piispanen and L. Ukonmaanaho, Anal. Methods, 2013, 5(12), 3082–3088 RSC.
  119. S. Takano, M. Tanimizu, T. Hirata and Y. Sohrin, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2013, 784, 33–41 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  120. T. M. Conway, A. D. Rosenberg, J. F. Adkins and S. G. John, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2013, 793, 44–52 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  121. H. C. Liu, C. F. You, W. J. Cai, C. H. Chung, K. F. Huang, B. S. Chen and Y. Li, Analyst, 2014, 139(4), 734–741 RSC.
  122. G. Giakisikli, M. Miro and A. Anthemidis, Anal. Chem., 2013, 85(19), 8968–8972 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  123. A. N. Anthemidis, E. I. Daftsis and N. P. Kalogiouri, Anal. Methods, 2014, 6(8), 2745–2750 RSC.
  124. T. Matousek, J. M. Currier, N. Trojankova, R. J. Saunders, M. C. Ishida, C. Gonzalez-Horta, S. Musil, Z. Mester, M. Styblo and J. Dedina, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(9), 1456–1465 RSC.
  125. I. S. Trujillo, A. G. de Torres, E. I. V. Alonso and J. M. C. Pavon, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(11), 1772–1780 RSC.
  126. E. Margui, B. Zawisza and R. Sitko, TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem., 2014, 53, 73–83 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  127. T. V. Hoogerstraete, S. Jamar, S. Wellens and K. Binnemans, Anal. Chem., 2014, 86(3), 1391–1394 CrossRef PubMed.
  128. S. D. Zhang, W. Liu, X. H. Zhang and Y. X. Duan, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 85, 1–12 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  129. N. Baghban, A. M. H. Shabani and S. Dadfarnia, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 2013, 93(13), 1367–1380 CrossRef CAS.
  130. E. Margui, B. Zawisza, R. Skorek, T. Theato, I. Queralt, M. Hidalgo and R. Sitko, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 88, 192–197 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  131. B. Zawisza, R. Sitko, E. Malicka and E. Talik, Anal. Methods, 2013, 5(22), 6425–6430 RSC.
  132. C. G. Yuan, J. C. Wang, W. H. Zhai, Y. Zhang, Y. Y. Zhang, J. Li and Q. H. Zhang, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 2013, 93(14), 1513–1524 CrossRef CAS.
  133. M. Raso, P. Censi and F. Saiano, Talanta, 2013, 116, 1085–1090 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  134. S. Z. Chen, Y. Y. He, D. B. Lu and X. L. Guo, At. Spectrosc., 2013, 34(3), 73–77 Search PubMed.
  135. C. M. Zurbrick, C. Gallon and A. R. Flegal, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2013, 800, 29–35 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  136. W. T. Bu, J. Zheng, Q. J. Guo, T. Aono, K. Tagami, S. Uchida, H. Tazoe and M. Yamada, J. Chromatogr. A, 2014, 1337, 171–178 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  137. F. Zereen, V. Yilmaz and Z. Arslan, Microchem. J., 2013, 110, 178–184 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  138. F. Cacho, L. Jankuv, L. Lauko, M. Kroliak, A. Manova and E. Beinrohr, Talanta, 2013, 116, 195–198 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  139. M. Amjadi, J. L. Manzoori and S. Hashemzadeh, Curr. Anal. Chem., 2013, 9(4), 668–674 CrossRef CAS.
  140. A. D. Sun, Q. C. Xu, S. J. Xu, X. H. Shangguan, H. Y. Shen and J. Sun, Anal. Lett., 2013, 46(16), 2610–2619 CrossRef CAS.
  141. S. M. Majedi, B. C. Kelly and H. K. Lee, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2014, 814, 39–48 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  142. K. Pytlakowska and R. Sitko, Anal. Methods, 2013, 5(21), 6192–6199 RSC.
  143. H. Pietila, P. Peramaki, J. Piispanen, L. Majuri, M. Starr, T. Nieminen, M. Kantola and L. Ukonmaanaho, Microchem. J., 2014, 112, 113–118 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  144. F. J. Zhao, K. L. Moore, E. Lombi and Y. G. Zhu, Trends Plant Sci., 2014, 19(3), 183–192 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  145. L. N. Suvarapu, Y. K. Seo and S. O. Baek, Rev. Anal. Chem., 2013, 32(3), 225–245 CAS.
  146. L. N. Suvarapu, Y. K. Seo and S. O. Baek, Asian J. Chem., 2013, 25(10), 5599–5601 CAS.
  147. L. V. Rajakovic, Z. N. Todorovic, V. N. Rajakovic-Ognjanovic and A. E. Onjia, J. Serb. Chem. Soc., 2013, 78(10), 1461–1479 CrossRef CAS.
  148. P. A. Mello, J. S. Barin, F. A. Duarte, C. A. Bizzi, L. O. Diehl, E. I. Muller and E. M. M. Flores, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2013, 405(24), 7615–7642 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  149. Y. K. Fan, X. L. Hou and W. J. Zhou, Desalination, 2013, 321, 32–46 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  150. C. W. Mueller, P. K. Weber, M. R. Kilburn, C. Hoeschen, M. Kleber and J. Pett-Ridge, in Advances in Agronomy, ed. D. L. Sparks, Elsevier Academic Press Inc, San Diego, 2013, vol. 121, pp. 1–46 Search PubMed.
  151. C. D. B. Amaral, J. A. Nobrega and A. R. A. Nogueira, Talanta, 2013, 115, 291–299 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  152. M. Welna, A. Szymczycha-Madeja and P. Pohl, Food Res. Int., 2013, 53(2), 922–930 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  153. V. Chand and S. Prasad, Microchem. J., 2013, 111, 53–61 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  154. Y. da Silva, C. W. A. do Nascimento and C. M. Biondi, Environ. Monit. Assess., 2014, 186(1), 47–53 CrossRef PubMed.
  155. C. D. B. Amaral, A. G. G. Dionisio, M. C. Santos, G. L. Donati, J. A. Nobrega and A. R. A. Nogueira, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(8), 1303–1310 RSC.
  156. K. Miranda, E. R. Pereira and J. A. G. Neto, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(5), 825–831 RSC.
  157. Y. Wang, R. Kanipayor and I. D. Brindle, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(1), 162–168 RSC.
  158. R. S. Picoloto, H. Wiltsche, G. Knapp, P. A. Mello, J. S. Barin and E. M. M. Flores, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 86, 123–130 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  159. A. M. Hernandez-Martinez and C. Padron-Sanz, Anal. Methods, 2013, 5(22), 6473–6479 RSC.
  160. S. Czarnecki and R. A. During, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 2014, 94(8), 801–811 CrossRef CAS.
  161. I. De La Calle, N. Cabaleiro, I. Lavilla and C. Bendicho, J. Hazard. Mater., 2013, 260, 202–209 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  162. F. V. M. Pontes, M. C. Carneiro, E. D. F. de Souza, L. I. D. da Silva, M. I. C. Monteiro and A. A. Neto, J. AOAC Int., 2013, 96(5), 1109–1113 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  163. L. P. Munoz, D. Purchase, H. Jones, J. Feldmann and H. Garelick, Anal. Methods, 2014, 6(3), 791–797 RSC.
  164. A. T. Reis, C. B. Lopes, C. M. Davidson, A. C. Duarte and E. Pereira, Geoderma, 2014, 213, 255–260 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  165. S. Goldberg and D. L. Suarez, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2014, 78(2), 480–485 CrossRef CAS.
  166. T. Zuliani, J. Scancar and R. Milacic, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2013, 405(23), 7231–7240 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  167. I. C. Regelink, L. Weng, G. F. Koopmans and W. H. Van Riemsdijk, Geoderma, 2013, 202, 134–141 CrossRef PubMed.
  168. U. S. Erdemir and S. Gucer, Chem. Speciation Bioavailability, 2013, 25(4), 265–272 CrossRef CAS.
  169. U. S. Erdemir and S. Gucer, Food Anal. Methods, 2014, 7(5), 994–1001 CrossRef.
  170. S. Khan, T. G. Kazi, N. F. Kolachi, I. Afridi and N. Ullah, J. AOAC Int., 2013, 96(3), 650–656 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  171. S. Khan, T. G. Kazi, M. B. Arain, N. F. Kolachi, J. A. Baig, H. I. Afridi and A. Q. Shah, Clean: Soil, Air, Water, 2013, 41(8), 808–815 CrossRef CAS.
  172. A. Szymczycha-Madeja, M. Welna and W. Zyrnicki, J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 2013, 24(5), 777–787 CAS.
  173. M. B. Javed, G. Kachanoski and T. Siddique, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2013, 787, 102–110 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  174. A. Georgiadis, D. Sauer, L. Herrmann, J. Breuer, M. Zarei and K. Stahr, Geoderma, 2013, 209, 251–261 CrossRef PubMed.
  175. N. N. Meeravali, K. Madhavi, R. Manjusha and S. J. Kumar, Talanta, 2014, 118, 37–44 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  176. A. Spietelun, L. Marcinkowski, M. de la Guardia and J. Namiesnik, Talanta, 2014, 119, 34–45 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  177. H. Sereshti, S. Bakhtiari, R. Toghyani, S. Samadi, T. Besharati-Seidani and N. O. Mahmoodi, Int. J. Environ. Res., 2014, 8(2), 377–386 Search PubMed.
  178. S. Khan, T. G. Kazi and M. Soylak, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 2014, 123, 194–199 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  179. K. Shrivas and N. K. Jaiswal, Food Chem., 2013, 141(3), 2263–2268 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  180. E. Stanisz and A. Zgola-Grzeskowiak, Talanta, 2013, 115, 178–183 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  181. D. K. Acar and D. Kara, Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 2014, 225(2), 9 Search PubMed.
  182. J. A. Oviedo, L. L. Fialho and J. A. Nobrega, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 86, 142–145 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  183. E. Yilmaz and M. Soylak, Talanta, 2013, 116, 882–886 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  184. C. Labrecque, L. Whitty-Leveille and D. Lariviere, Anal. Chem., 2013, 85(21), 10549–10555 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  185. S. Z. Chen, X. L. Cheng, Y. Y. He, S. P. Zhu and D. B. Lu, Microchim. Acta, 2013, 180(15–16), 1479–1486 CrossRef CAS.
  186. X. Q. Guo, X. T. Tang, M. He, B. B. Chen, K. Nan, Q. Y. Zhang and B. Hu, RSC Adv., 2014, 4(38), 19960–19969 RSC.
  187. S. P. Wen and X. S. Zhu, Talanta, 2013, 115, 814–818 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  188. M. Sun, G. J. Liu and Q. H. Wu, Food Chem., 2013, 141(1), 66–71 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  189. M. Mirzaei and A. Naeini, J. Anal. Chem., 2013, 68(7), 595–599 CrossRef CAS.
  190. D. Afzali, F. Fathirad, S. Ghaseminezhad and Z. Afzali, Environ. Monit. Assess., 2014, 186(6), 3523–3529 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  191. D. Ozdes, C. Duran, H. Serencam and D. Sahin, At. Spectrosc., 2013, 34(5), 164–169 CAS.
  192. B. Feist and B. Mikula, Food Chem., 2014, 147, 225–229 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  193. H. Serencam, C. Duran, D. Ozdes and H. Bektas, Acta Chim. Slov., 2013, 60(2), 287–293 CAS.
  194. X. L. Guo, S. Z. Chen, Y. Zhang and D. B. Lu, At. Spectrosc., 2014, 35(2), 55–59 CAS.
  195. M. H. Mashhadizadeh, M. Amoli-Diva, M. R. Shapouri and H. Afruzi, Food Chem., 2014, 151, 300–305 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  196. E. Kilinc, A. Dundar, S. Ozdemir and V. Okumus, At. Spectrosc., 2013, 34(3), 78–88 CAS.
  197. H. Elvan, D. Ozdes, C. Duran, V. N. Bulut, N. Gumrukcuoglu and M. Soylak, J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 2013, 24(10), 1701–1706 CAS.
  198. M. Behbahani, T. Gorji, M. Mahyari, M. Salarian, A. Bagheri and A. Shaabani, Food Anal. Methods, 2014, 7(5), 957–966 CrossRef.
  199. H. Ashkenani and M. A. Taher, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 2013, 93(11), 1132–1145 CrossRef CAS.
  200. Z. A. Chandio, F. N. Talpur, H. Khan, G. Q. Khaskheli and H. I. Afridi, Anal. Lett., 2013, 46(10), 1562–1572 CrossRef CAS.
  201. M. Behbahani, A. Bagheri, M. M. Amini, O. Sadeghi, M. Salarian, F. Najafi and M. Taghizadeh, Food Chem., 2013, 141(1), 48–53 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  202. M. S. El-Shahawi, A. S. Bashammakh, M. I. Orief, A. A. Alsibaai and E. A. Al-Harbi, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2014, 20(1), 308–314 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  203. R. K. Sharma, A. Puri, Y. Monga and A. Adholeya, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2014, 127, 121–130 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  204. M. Taghizadeh, A. A. Asgharinezhad, N. Samkhaniany, A. Tadjarodi, A. Abbaszadeh and M. Pooladi, Microchim. Acta, 2014, 181(5–6), 597–605 CrossRef CAS.
  205. M. Taghizadeh, A. A. Asgharinezhad, M. Pooladi, M. Barzin, A. Abbaszadeh and A. Tadjarodi, Microchim. Acta, 2013, 180(11–12), 1073–1084 CrossRef CAS.
  206. N. Jalbani and M. Soylak, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2014, 102, 174–178 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  207. S. Z. Mohammadi, H. Hamidian, L. Karimzadeh and Z. Moeinadini, J. Anal. Chem., 2013, 68(11), 953–958 CrossRef CAS.
  208. H. Tavallali, G. Deilamy-Rad and P. Peykarimah, Environ. Monit. Assess., 2013, 185(9), 7723–7738 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  209. S. Z. Chen, S. P. Zhu, Y. Y. He and D. B. Lu, Food Chem., 2014, 150, 254–259 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  210. N. Burham, S. R. Abdel-Hafeez, S. M. Abdel-Azeem and M. F. El-Shahat, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 2013, 93(13), 1413–1427 CrossRef CAS.
  211. E. Yavuz, S. Tokalioglu, H. Sahan and S. Patat, RSC Adv., 2013, 3(46), 24650–24657 RSC.
  212. M. Soylak and D. H. Sahinbas, Desalin. Water Treat., 2013, 51(37–39), 7296–7303 CrossRef CAS.
  213. M. Tuzen, Y. E. Unsal, M. Soylak, Z. Akkirman and B. Hazer, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 2013, 48(11), 2384–2390 CAS.
  214. S. K. Wadhwa, M. Tuzen, T. G. Kazi, M. Soylak and B. Hazer, Food Chem., 2014, 152, 75–80 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  215. E. Stanisz, J. Werner and H. Matusiewicz, Microchem. J., 2014, 114, 229–237 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  216. T. F. de Oliveira, F. M. de Oliveira, M. G. Segatelli and C. R. T. Tarley, Anal. Methods, 2013, 5(13), 3264–3271 RSC.
  217. M. H. Baki and F. Shemirani, Anal. Methods, 2013, 5(13), 3255–3263 RSC.
  218. Z. A. Chandio, F. N. Talpur, H. I. Afridi, H. Khan, G. Q. Khaskheli and M. I. Khaskheli, Anal. Methods, 2013, 5(17), 4425–4429 RSC.
  219. H. Ciftci, M. M. Temuz and E. Ciftci, J. AOAC Int., 2013, 96(4), 875–879 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  220. E. Yavuz, S. Tokalioglu, H. Sahan and S. Patat, Talanta, 2013, 115, 724–729 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  221. A. N. Siyal, L. Elci, S. Q. Memon, A. Akdogan, A. Hol, A. A. Kartal and M. Y. Khuhawar, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 2014, 94(8), 743–755 CrossRef CAS.
  222. M. A. Taher, N. Jandaghi, H. Fazelirad and H. Ashkenani, Environ. Monit. Assess., 1987–1997, 186(3) Search PubMed.
  223. N. Pourreza and K. Sheikhnajdi, J. Iran. Chem. Soc., 2014, 11(3), 711–716 CrossRef CAS.
  224. S. Z. Chen, S. P. Zhu and D. B. Lu, Microchem. J., 2013, 110, 89–93 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  225. S. W. Su, B. B. Chen, M. He, B. Hu and Z. W. Xiao, Talanta, 2014, 119, 458–466 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  226. S. K. Wadhwa, M. Tuzen, T. G. Kazi and M. Soylak, Talanta, 2013, 116, 205–209 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  227. Q. O. dos Santos, M. A. Bezerra, G. D. Lima, K. M. Diniz, M. G. Segatelli, T. O. Germiniano, V. D. Santos and C. R. T. Tarley, Quim. Nova, 2014, 37(1), 63–68 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  228. K. Miranda and E. R. Pereira-Filho, Food Anal. Methods, 2013, 6(6), 1607–1610 CrossRef.
  229. R. M. Galazzi and M. A. Z. Arruda, Talanta, 2013, 117, 543–548 CrossRef PubMed.
  230. M. Y. Burylin and Z. A. Temerdashev, Inorg. Mater., 2013, 49(14), 1264–1271 CrossRef CAS.
  231. R. Dobrowolski, A. Adamczyk and M. Otto, Talanta, 2013, 113, 19–25 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  232. C. Waterlot and F. Douay, Measurement, 2013, 46(8), 2348–2358 CrossRef PubMed.
  233. A. A. Shaltout, M. S. Abdel-Aal, B. Welz and I. N. B. Castilho, Anal. Lett., 2013, 46(13), 2089–2100 CrossRef CAS.
  234. M. Krawczyk, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 2014, 88, 377–384 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  235. B. Gomez-Nieto, M. J. Gismera, M. T. Sevilla and J. R. Procopio, Talanta, 2013, 116, 860–865 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  236. I. N. B. Castilho, E. R. Pereira, B. Welz, A. A. Shaltout, E. Caraseka and I. B. G. Martensd, Anal. Methods, 2014, 6(9), 2870–2875 RSC.
  237. M. Krawczyk and H. Matusiewicz, J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 2013, 24(5), 749–757 CAS.
  238. P. Coufalik, O. Zverina and J. Komarek, Chem. Pap., 2014, 68(4), 427–434 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  239. R. Fernandez-Martinez and I. Rucandio, Anal. Methods, 2013, 5(16), 4131–4137 RSC.
  240. R. E. Sturgeon and V. Luong, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(10), 1610–1619 RSC.
  241. G. L. Scheffler and D. Pozebon, Anal. Methods, 2013, 5(17), 4371–4377 RSC.
  242. Z. Zhang, Z. Wang, Q. Li, H. J. Zou and Y. Shi, Talanta, 2014, 119, 613–619 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  243. W. Nischkauer, E. Herincs, M. Puschenreiter, W. Wenzel and A. Limbeck, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 89, 60–65 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  244. J. Hellings, S. B. Adeloju and T. V. Verheyen, Microchem. J., 2013, 111, 62–66 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  245. T. Frentiu, A. I. Mihaltan, M. Senila, E. Darvasi, M. Ponta, M. Frentiu and B. P. Pintican, Microchem. J., 2013, 110, 545–552 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  246. Y. X. Gu, M. Meng, J. J. Shao, J. B. Shi, B. He and G. B. Jiang, Chin. J. Anal. Chem., 2013, 41(11), 1754–1757 CAS.
  247. M. Kadlecova, M. Daye and B. Ouddane, Anal. Lett., 2014, 47(4), 697–706 CrossRef CAS.
  248. Y. F. Zhang, C. B. Zheng, X. Hou and K. L. Xu, Anal. Methods, 2013, 5(12), 3142–3147 RSC.
  249. G. S. Yang, J. Zheng, K. Tagami and S. Uchida, Talanta, 2013, 116, 181–187 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  250. J. Zheng, K. Tagami, W. T. Bu, S. Uchida, Y. Watanabe, Y. Kubota, S. Fuma and S. Ihara, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2014, 48(10), 5433–5438 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  251. Y. Takagai, M. Furukawa, Y. Kameo and K. Suzuki, Anal. Methods, 2014, 6(2), 355–362 RSC.
  252. N. Pallavicini, F. Ecke, E. Engstrom, D. C. Baxter and I. Rodushkin, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(10), 1591–1599 RSC.
  253. J. Tolu, P. Di Tullo, I. Le Hecho, Y. Thiry, F. Pannier, M. Potin-Gautier and M. Bueno, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2014, 406(4), 1221–1231 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  254. M. L. Lin and S. J. Jiang, Food Chem., 2013, 141(3), 2158–2162 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  255. Y. S. Liu, Z. C. Hu, M. Li and S. Gao, Chin. Sci. Bull., 2013, 58(32), 3863–3878 CrossRef CAS.
  256. S. Cagno, K. Hellemans, O. C. Lind, L. Skipperud, K. Janssens and B. Salbu, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2014, 16(2), 306–312 CAS.
  257. J. Malherbe, F. Claverie, A. Alvarez, B. Fernandez, R. Pereiro and J. L. Molloy, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2013, 793, 72–78 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  258. N. S. Horner and D. Beauchemin, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(4), 715–720 RSC.
  259. I. Konz, B. Fernandez, M. L. Fernandez, R. Pereiro and A. Sanz-Medel, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2014, 809, 88–96 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  260. M. Debeljak, J. T. van Elteren and K. Vogel-Mikus, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2013, 787, 155–162 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  261. X. Ma, Y. G. Yin, J. B. Shi, J. F. Liu and G. B. Jiang, Anal. Methods, 2014, 6(1), 164–169 RSC.
  262. J. Karasinski, W. Cegielkowska, M. Wojciechowski, M. Wierzbicka and E. Bulska, Chem. Pap., 2014, 68(3), 291–299 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  263. L. H. Liu, B. He, Z. J. Yun, J. Sun and G. B. Jiang, J. Chromatogr. A, 2013, 1304, 227–233 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  264. J. C. T. Elguera, E. Y. Barrientos and K. Wrobel, J. Agric. Food Chem., 2013, 61(27), 6622–6628 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  265. Z. F. Ge and C. Y. Wei, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 2013, 51(5), 391–399 CAS.
  266. W. Thosaikham, K. Jitmanee, R. Sittipout, S. Maneetong, A. Chantiratikul and P. Chantiratikul, Food Chem., 2014, 145, 736–742 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  267. R. S. Harmon, R. E. Russo and R. R. Hark, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 87, 11–26 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  268. M. A. Khater, Opt. Spectrosc., 2013, 115(4), 574–590 CrossRef CAS.
  269. P. K. Rai, A. K. Srivastava, B. Sharma, P. Dhar, A. K. Mishra and G. Watal, J. Evidence-Based Complementary Altern. Med., 2013, 9 Search PubMed.
  270. J. Z. Chen, J. N. Bai, G. J. Song, J. Sun, Z. C. Deng and Y. L. Wang, Appl. Opt., 2013, 52(25), 6295–6299 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  271. S. Pandhija, N. K. Rai, A. K. Pathak, A. K. Rai and A. K. Choudhary, Spectrosc. Lett., 2014, 47(8), 579–589 CrossRef CAS.
  272. T. A. Labutin, S. M. Zaytsev, A. M. Popov, I. V. Seliverstova, S. E. Bozhenko and N. B. Zorov, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 87, 57–64 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  273. K. R. Kim, G. Kim, J. Y. Kim, K. Park and K. W. Kim, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(1), 76–84 RSC.
  274. P. M. Mukhono, K. H. Angeyo, A. Dehayem-Kamadjeu and K. A. Kaduki, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 87, 81–85 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  275. G. Kim, J. Kwak, K. R. Kim, H. Lee, K. W. Kim, H. Yang and K. Park, J. Hazard. Mater., 2013, 263, 754–760 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  276. M. Z. Martin, M. A. Mayes, K. R. Heal, D. J. Brice and S. D. Wullschleger, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 87, 100–107 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  277. R. S. Bricklemyer, D. J. Brown, P. J. Turk and S. M. Clegg, Appl. Spectrosc., 2013, 67(10), 1185–1199 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  278. M. D. Gomes, G. G. A. de Carvalho, D. Santos and F. J. Krug, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 86, 137–141 CrossRef PubMed.
  279. L. Huang, M. Y. Yao, J. L. Lin, M. H. Liu and X. W. He, J. Appl. Spectrosc., 2014, 80(6), 957–961 CrossRef CAS.
  280. M. Y. Yao, L. Huang, J. H. Zheng, S. Q. Fan and M. H. Liu, Opt. Laser Technol., 2013, 52, 70–74 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  281. N. Aras and S. Yalcin, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(3), 545–552 RSC.
  282. M. Grafe, E. Donner, R. N. Collins and E. Lombi, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2014, 822, 1–22 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  283. Q. Zhang, Z. S. Yu, X. L. Li and G. H. Li, Spectrosc. Spectral Anal., 2013, 33(12), 3402–3407 CAS.
  284. S. Akbulut, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(5), 853–860 RSC.
  285. J. B. Ghasemi, M. K. Rofouei and N. Amiri, X-Ray Spectrom., 2014, 43(3), 131–137 CrossRef CAS.
  286. M. B. B. Guerra, C. Schaefer, G. G. A. de Carvalho, P. F. de Souza, D. Santos, L. C. Nunes and F. J. Krug, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(7), 1096–1101 RSC.
  287. Y. D. Wang, J. Mesjasz-Przybylowicz, G. Tylko, A. D. Barnabas and W. J. Przybylowicz, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B, 2013, 306, 134–139 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  288. O. T. Butler, J. M. Cook, C. M. Davidson, C. F. Harrington and D. L. Miles, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2009, 24(2), 131–177 RSC.
  289. M. J. Gutierrez-Gines, J. Pastor and A. J. Hernandez, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2013, 15(8), 1545–1552 CAS.
  290. M. Tighe and N. Forster, Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 2014, 45(1), 53–60 CrossRef CAS.
  291. E. L. Shuttleworth, M. G. Evans, S. M. Hutchinson and J. J. Rothwell, Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 2014, 225(2), 13 CrossRef.
  292. W. Y. Hu, B. Huang, D. C. Weindorf and Y. Chen, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 2014, 92(4), 420–426 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  293. C. Parsons, E. M. Grabulosa, E. Pili, G. H. Floor, G. Roman-Ross and L. Charlet, J. Hazard. Mater., 2013, 262, 1213–1222 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  294. D. C. Weindorf, N. Bakr, Y. Zhu, A. McWhirt, C. L. Ping, G. Michaelson, C. Nelson, K. Shook and S. Nuss, Pedosphere, 2014, 24(1), 1–12 CrossRef CAS.
  295. P. J. Potts, P. C. Webb and M. Thompson, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 2013, 37(4), 403–416 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  296. E. C. Hathorne, A. Gagnon, T. Felis, J. Adkins, R. Asami, W. Boer, N. Caillon, D. Case, K. M. Cobb, E. Douville, P. deMenocal, A. Eisenhauer, D. Garbe-Schonberg, W. Geibert, S. Goldstein, K. Hughen, M. Inoue, H. Kawahata, M. Kolling, F. L. Cornec, B. K. Linsley, H. V. McGregor, P. Montagna, I. S. Nurhati, T. M. Quinn, J. Raddatz, H. Rebaubier, L. Robinson, A. Sadekov, R. Sherrell, D. Sinclair, A. W. Tudhope, G. J. Wei, H. R. Wong, H. C. Wu and C. F. You, Geochem., Geophys., Geosyst., 2013, 14(9), 3730–3750 CrossRef CAS.
  297. G. L. Foster, B. Honisch, G. Paris, G. S. Dwyer, J. W. B. Rae, T. Elliott, J. Gaillardet, N. G. Hemming, P. Louvat and A. Vengosh, Chem. Geol., 2013, 358, 1–14 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  298. J. Kosler, J. Slama, E. Belousova, F. Corfu, G. E. Gehrels, A. Gerdes, M. S. A. Horstwood, K. N. Sircombe, P. J. Sylvester, M. Tiepolo, M. J. Whitehouse and J. D. Woodhead, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 2013, 37(3), 243–259 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  299. M. Ogasawara, M. Fukuyama, K. Horie, T. Sumii, M. Takehara and M. Sudo, Isl. Arc, 2013, 22(3), 306–317 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  300. X. H. Li, G. Q. Tang, B. Gong, Y. H. Yang, K. J. Hou, Z. C. Hu, Q. L. Li, Y. Liu and W. X. Li, Chin. Sci. Bull., 2013, 58(36), 4647–4654 CrossRef CAS.
  301. L. Bracciali, R. R. Parrish, M. S. A. Horstwood, D. J. Condon and Y. Najman, Chem. Geol., 2013, 347, 82–101 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  302. D. Tabersky, N. A. Luechinger, M. Rossier, E. Reusser, K. Hametner, B. Aeschlimann, D. A. Frick, S. C. Halim, J. Thompson, L. Danyushevsky and D. Gunther, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(6), 955–962 RSC.
  303. D. Garbe-Schonberg and S. Muller, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(6), 990–1000 RSC.
  304. J. S. Denton, M. T. Murrell, S. J. Goldstein, A. J. Nunn, R. S. Amato and K. A. Hinrichs, Anal. Chem., 2013, 85(20), 9975–9981 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  305. A. M. Duffin, G. L. Hart, R. C. Hanlen and G. C. Eiden, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2013, 296(2), 1031–1036 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  306. J. H. Choi, J. S. Ryu, H. S. Shin, J. Kim and C. S. Cheong, Geosci. J., 2013, 17(2), 123–127 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  307. T. F. Nagler, A. D. Anbar, C. Archer, T. Goldberg, G. W. Gordon, N. D. Greber, C. Siebert, Y. Sohrin and D. Vance, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 2014, 38(2), 149–151 Search PubMed.
  308. A. J. Mayer and M. E. Wieser, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(1), 85–94 RSC.
  309. D. Gunther, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(6), 952–954 RSC.
  310. O. Borovinskaya, M. Burger, L. Flamigni, S. Gschwind, D. Tabersky, H. A. O. Wang, B. Hattendorf, J. Koch and D. Gunther, Chimia, 2014, 68(3), 112–118 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  311. J. Pisonero, N. Bordel and V. S. Smentkowski, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(7), 970–972 RSC.
  312. D. Evans and W. Muller, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(7), 1039–1044 RSC.
  313. A. Izmer, S. Goderis, B. M. Simonson, I. McDonald, S. W. Hassler, P. Claeys and F. Vanhaecke, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(7), 1031–1038 RSC.
  314. S. M. Chernonozhkin, S. Goderis, S. Bauters, B. Vekemans, L. Vincze, P. Claeys and F. Vanhaecke, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(6), 1001–1016 RSC.
  315. J. R. Chirinos, D. D. Oropeza, J. J. Gonzalez, H. M. Hou, M. Morey, V. Zorba and R. E. Russo, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(7), 1292–1298 RSC.
  316. J. M. Cottle, A. J. Burrows, A. Kylander-Clark, P. A. Freedman and R. S. Cohen, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(11), 1700–1706 RSC.
  317. S. H. Liu, Z. C. Hu, D. Gunther, Y. H. Ye, Y. S. Liu, S. Gao and S. H. Hu, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(3), 536–544 RSC.
  318. L. Flamigni, J. Koch and D. Gunther, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(2), 280–286 RSC.
  319. L. Dorta, R. Kovacs, J. Koch, K. Nishiguchi, K. Utani and D. Gunther, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(9), 1513–1521 RSC.
  320. F. X. d'Abzac, B. L. Beard, A. D. Czaja, H. Konishi, J. J. Schauer and C. M. Johnson, Anal. Chem., 2013, 85(24), 11885–11892 CrossRef PubMed.
  321. K. Ikehata and T. Hirata, Anal. Sci., 2013, 29(12), 1213–1217 CrossRef CAS.
  322. P. K. Diwakar, J. J. Gonzalez, S. S. Harilal, R. E. Russo and A. Hassanein, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(2), 339–346 RSC.
  323. S. E. Kesler, R. J. Bodnar and T. P. Mernagh, Geofluids, 2013, 13(4), 398–404 CrossRef PubMed.
  324. M. Walle and C. A. Heinrich, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(6), 1052–1057 RSC.
  325. M. Albrecht, I. T. Derrey, I. Horn, S. Schuth and S. Weyer, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(6), 1034–1041 RSC.
  326. F. R. L. Faulstich, R. Neumann, J. Pironon and A. Randi, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 2013, 37(4), 393–402 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  327. K. C. Benison, Geofluids, 2013, 13(4), 579–593 CrossRef PubMed.
  328. S. E. Gilbert, L. V. Danyushevsky, K. Goemann and D. Death, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(6), 1024–1033 RSC.
  329. S. E. Gilbert, L. V. Danyushevsky, T. Rodemann, N. Shimizu, A. Gurenko, S. Meffre, H. Thomas, R. R. Large and D. Death, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(6), 1042–1051 RSC.
  330. C. C. Wohlgemuth-Ueberwasser, F. Viljoen and C. R. McClung, Ore Geol. Rev., 2014, 56, 45–52 CrossRef PubMed.
  331. R. Pina, F. Gervilla, S. J. Barnes, L. Ortega and R. Lunar, Eur. J. Mineral., 2013, 25(2), 241–252 CrossRef CAS.
  332. R. Belissont, M. C. Boiron, B. Luais and M. Cathelineau, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 2014, 126, 518–540 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  333. M. Guillong, A. von Quadt, S. Sakata, I. Peytcheva and O. Bachmann, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(6), 963–970 RSC.
  334. A. Pullen, M. Ibanez-Mejia, G. E. Gehrels, J. C. Ibanez-Mejia and M. Pecha, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(6), 971–980 RSC.
  335. E. Marillo-Sialer, J. Woodhead, J. Hergt, A. Greig, M. Guillong, A. Gleadow, N. Evans and C. Paton, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(6), 981–989 RSC.
  336. A. N. Steely, J. K. Hourigan and E. Juel, Chem. Geol., 2014, 372, 92–108 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  337. J. Kosler, S. E. Jackson, Z. P. Yang and R. Wirth, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(5), 832–840 RSC.
  338. D. M. Chew, J. A. Petrus and B. S. Kamber, Chem. Geol., 2014, 363, 185–199 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  339. A. El Korh, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 86, 75–87 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  340. Y. H. Yang, F. Y. Wu, Y. Li, J. H. Yang, L. W. Xie, Y. Liu, Y. B. Zhang and C. Huang, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(6), 1017–1023 RSC.
  341. A. El Korh, Chem. Geol., 2014, 371, 46–59 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  342. X. P. Xia, Z. Y. Ren, G. J. Wei, L. Zhang, M. Sun and Y. J. Wang, Geochem. J., 2013, 47(4), 459–468 CrossRef CAS.
  343. J. L. Payne, N. J. Pearson, K. J. Grant and G. P. Halverson, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(7), 1068–1079 RSC.
  344. C. M. Fisher, J. D. Vervoort and J. M. Hanchar, Chem. Geol., 2014, 363, 125–133 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  345. A. R. C. Kylander-Clark, B. R. Hacker and J. M. Cottle, Chem. Geol., 2013, 345, 99–112 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  346. C. M. Fisher, J. D. Vervoort and S. A. DuFrane, Geochem., Geophys., Geosyst., 2014, 15(1), 121–139 CrossRef CAS.
  347. J. Mikova, J. Kosler and M. Wiedenbeck, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(5), 903–914 RSC.
  348. J. I. Kimura, Q. Chang and H. Kawabata, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(9), 1522–1529 RSC.
  349. J. Kimura, H. Kawabata, Q. Chang, T. Miyazaki and T. Hanyu, Geochem. J., 2013, 47(3), 369–384 CrossRef CAS.
  350. Q. Y. Lin, G. H. Niu, Q. H. Wang, Q. L. Yu and Y. X. Duan, Appl. Spectrosc. Rev., 2013, 48(6), 487–508 CrossRef CAS.
  351. O. Forni, S. Maurice, O. Gasnault, R. C. Wiens, A. Cousin, S. M. Clegg, J. B. Sirven and J. Lasue, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 86, 31–41 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  352. X. Q. Zhu, T. Xu, Q. Y. Tin, L. Liang, G. H. Niu, H. J. Lai, M. J. Xu, X. Wang, H. Li and Y. X. Duan, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2014, 93, 8–13 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  353. I. Choi, G. C. Y. Chan, X. L. Mao, D. L. Perry and R. E. Russo, Appl. Spectrosc., 2013, 67(11), 1275–1284 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  354. G. C. Y. Chan, X. L. Mao, I. Choi, A. Sarkar, O. P. Lam, D. K. Shuh and R. E. Russo, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 89, 40–49 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  355. P. Ko and I. Jovanovic, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 90, 68–71 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  356. M. Bedard and J. Pitre, Spectroscopy, 2014, 29(5), 12–17 CAS.
  357. V. Chrastny, J. Rohovec, E. Cadkova, J. Pasava, J. Farkas and M. Novak, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 2014, 38(1), 103–110 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  358. W. Zhang, Z. C. Hu, Y. S. Liu, H. H. Chen, S. Gao and R. M. Gaschnig, Anal. Chem., 2012, 84(24), 10686–10693 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  359. Z. C. Hu, W. Zhang, Y. S. Liu, H. H. Chen, R. M. Gaschnig, K. Q. Zong, M. Li, S. Gao and S. H. Hu, Chem. Geol., 2013, 355, 144–152 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  360. L. Qi, J. F. Gao, M. F. Zhou and J. Hu, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 2013, 37(3), 345–351 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  361. A. J. Menicucci, J. A. Matthews and H. J. Spero, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 2013, 27(16), 1873–1881 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  362. J. L. Pi, C. F. You and C. H. Chung, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(5), 861–867 RSC.
  363. H. Z. Wei, S. Y. Jiang, N. G. Hemming, J. H. Yang, T. Yang, H. P. Wu, T. L. Yang, X. Yan and W. Pu, Talanta, 2014, 123, 151–160 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  364. J. Xiao, Y. K. Xiao, Z. D. Jin, M. Y. He and C. Q. Liu, Aust. J. Earth Sci., 2013, 60(4), 431–447 CrossRef CAS.
  365. T. J. Ireland, F. L. H. Tissot, R. Yokochi and N. Dauphas, Chem. Geol., 2013, 357, 203–214 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  366. J. Liu, D. H. Zou, X. L. Yang, X. Z. Cheng and Q. Chen, Anal. Methods, 2013, 5(23), 6774–6780 RSC.
  367. A. H. El-Sheikh, Y. S. Al-Degs, J. A. Sweileh and A. J. Said, Talanta, 2013, 116, 482–487 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  368. E. Abad-Pena, M. T. Larrea-Marin, M. E. Villanueva-Tagle and M. S. Pomares-Alfonso, Talanta, 2014, 124, 79–88 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  369. S. Sert, Appl. Spectrosc., 2013, 67(7), 731–737 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  370. K. Jankowski and E. Reszke, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(8), 1196–1212 RSC.
  371. B. Vysetti, D. Vummiti, P. Roy, C. Taylor, C. T. Kamala, M. Satyanarayanan, P. Kar, K. S. V. Subramanyam, A. K. Raju and K. Abburi, At. Spectrosc., 2014, 35(2), 65–78 CAS.
  372. V. Balaram, D. Vummiti, P. Roy, C. Taylor, P. Kar, A. K. Raju and K. Abburi, Curr. Sci., 2013, 104(9), 1207–1215 CAS.
  373. J. M. Eiler, B. Bergquist, I. Bourg, P. Cartigny, J. Farquhar, A. Gagnon, W. F. Guo, I. Halevy, A. Hofmann, T. E. Larson, N. Levin, E. A. Schauble and D. Stolper, Chem. Geol., 2014, 372, 119–143 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  374. P. S. Savage, R. M. G. Armytage, R. B. Georg and A. N. Halliday, Lithos, 2014, 190, 500–519 CrossRef PubMed.
  375. M. Chiaradia, U. Schaltegger, R. Spikings, J. F. Wotzlaw and M. Ovtcharova, Econ. Geol., 2013, 108(4), 565–584 CrossRef CAS.
  376. D. J. Weiss, C. Harris, K. Maher and T. Bullen, J. Chem. Educ., 2013, 90(8), 1014–1017 CrossRef CAS.
  377. V. Devulder, P. Degryse and F. Vanhaecke, Anal. Chem., 2013, 85(24), 12077–12084 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  378. T. Miyazaki, J. I. Kimura and Q. Chang, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(3), 483–490 RSC.
  379. M. C. Valdes, M. Moreira, J. Foriel and F. Moynier, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2014, 394, 135–145 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  380. S. A. Liu, D. D. Li, S. G. Li, F. Z. Teng, S. Ke, Y. S. He and Y. H. Lu, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(1), 122–133 RSC.
  381. L. Lobo, P. Degryse, A. Shortland, K. Eremin and F. Vanhaecke, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(1), 58–64 RSC.
  382. C. E. Morisset, J. S. Scoates, D. Weis and A. Rahier, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 2014, 38(2), 159–176 CAS.
  383. J. B. Wimpenny, Y. Amelin and Q. Z. Yin, Anal. Chem., 2013, 85(23), 11258–11264 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  384. C. S. Cheong, J. S. Ryu and Y. J. Jeong, Geosci. J., 2013, 17(4), 389–395 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  385. J. L. Ma, G. J. Wei, Y. Liu, Z. Y. Ren, Y. G. Xu and Y. H. Yang, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(12), 1926–1931 RSC.
  386. B. Gueguen, O. Rouxel, E. Ponzevera, A. Bekker and Y. Fouquet, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 2013, 37(3), 297–317 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  387. A. J. Mason, G. M. Henderson and A. Vaks, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 2013, 37(3), 261–275 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  388. J. B. Creech, J. A. Baker, M. R. Handler and M. Bizzarroc, Chem. Geol., 2014, 363, 293–300 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  389. S. H. Han, Z. Varga, J. Krajko, M. Wallenius, K. Song and K. Mayer, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(12), 1919–1925 RSC.
  390. L. Lobo, P. Degryse, A. Shortland and F. Vanhaecke, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(8), 1213–1219 RSC.
  391. E. E. Stueken, J. Foriel, B. K. Nelson, R. Buick and D. C. Catling, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(11), 1734–1749 RSC.
  392. A. P. Fornadel, P. G. Spry, S. E. Jackson, R. D. Mathur, J. B. Chapman and I. Girard, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(4), 623–637 RSC.
  393. A. Pourmand, F. L. H. Tissot, M. Arienzo and A. Sharifi, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 2014, 38(2), 129–148 CAS.
  394. V. Devulder, L. Lobo, K. Van Hoecke, P. Degryse and F. Vanhaecke, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2013, 89, 20–29 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  395. M. S. Fantle and E. T. Tipper, Earth-Sci. Rev., 2014, 129, 148–177 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  396. G. Menard, I. Vlastelic, D. A. Ionov, E. F. Rose-Koga, J. L. Piro and C. Pin, Chem. Geol., 2013, 354, 139–149 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  397. S. Misra, M. Greaves, R. Owen, J. Kerr, A. C. Elmore and H. Elderfield, Geochem., Geophys., Geosyst., 2014, 15(4), 1617–1628 CrossRef CAS.
  398. J. L. Ma, G. J. Wei, Y. Liu, Z. Y. Ren, Y. G. Xu and Y. H. Yang, Chin. Sci. Bull., 2013, 58(25), 3111–3118 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  399. H. D. Scher, E. M. Griffith and W. P. Buckley, Geochem., Geophys., Geosyst., 2014, 15(2), 499–508 CrossRef CAS.
  400. M. Dronov and J. Schram, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(11), 1796–1803 RSC.
  401. J. C. J. Petit, A. Taillez and N. Mattielli, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 2013, 37(3), 319–335 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  402. F. Z. Teng and W. Yang, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 2014, 28(1), 19–24 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  403. M. Tanimizu, N. Sugiyama, E. Ponzevera and G. Bayon, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(9), 1372–1376 RSC.
  404. T. Schirmer, A. Koschinsky and M. Bau, Chem. Geol., 2014, 376, 44–51 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  405. Z. C. Wang and H. Becker, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 2014, 38(2), 189–209 CAS.
  406. J. Li, X. Y. Jiang, J. F. Xu, L. F. Zhong, X. C. Wang, G. Q. Wang and P. P. Zhao, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 38(1), 37–50 CrossRef PubMed.
  407. S. Goderis, R. Tagle, J. Belza, J. Smit, A. Montanari, F. Vanhaecke, J. Erzinger and P. Claeys, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 2013, 120, 417–446 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  408. Y. W. Liu, S. M. Aciego, A. D. Wanamaker and B. K. Sell, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 2013, 27(15), 1705–1714 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  409. M. Y. He, Y. K. Xiao, Z. D. Jin, Y. Q. Ma, J. Xiao, Y. L. Zhang, C. G. Luo and F. Zhang, Anal. Chem., 2013, 85(13), 6248–6253 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  410. K. C. Crocket, M. Lambelet, T. V. de Flierdt, M. Rehkamper and L. F. Robinson, Chem. Geol., 2014, 374, 128–140 CrossRef PubMed.
  411. Z. Y. Chu, J. H. Guo, Y. H. Yang, L. Qi and C. F. Li, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 2014, 38(1), 61–72 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  412. J. G. Liu and D. G. Pearson, Chem. Geol., 2014, 363, 301–311 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  413. A. Kumar, E. Nagaraju, D. S. Sarma and D. W. Davis, Chem. Geol., 2014, 372, 72–79 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  414. L. A. Neymark, W. R. Premo, N. N. Mel'nikov and P. Emsbo, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(1), 65–75 RSC.
  415. Y. Fukami and T. Yokoyama, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2014, 29(3), 520–528 RSC.
  416. J. M. Koornneef, C. Bouman, J. B. Schwieters and G. R. Davies, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2014, 819, 49–55 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  417. G. O. Lehn, A. D. Jacobson and C. Holmden, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 2013, 351, 69–75 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  418. M. O. Naumenko, K. Mezger, T. F. Nagler and I. M. Villa, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 2013, 122, 353–362 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  419. C. E. Bonamici, R. Kozdon, T. Ushikubo and J. W. Valley, J. Metamorph. Geol., 2014, 32(1), 71–92 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  420. R. B. Ickert and R. A. Stern, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 2013, 37(4), 429–448 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  421. N. Allison, D. Chambers, A. A. Finch and EIMF, Surf. Interface Anal., 2013, 45(9), 1389–1394 CrossRef CAS.
  422. R. I. Gabitov, A. C. Gagnon, Y. Guan, J. M. Eiler and J. F. Adkins, Chem. Geol., 2013, 356, 94–108 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  423. E. B. Melchiorre, G. R. Huss and A. Lopez, Chem. Geol., 2014, 367, 63–69 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  424. S. C. Chelgani and B. Hart, Miner. Eng., 2014, 57, 1–11 CrossRef PubMed.
  425. G. Holzlechner, M. Kubicek, H. Hutter and J. Fleig, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2013, 28(7), 1080–1089 RSC.
  426. M. Kubicek, G. Holzlechner, A. K. Opitz, S. Larisegger, H. Hutter and J. Fleig, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014, 289, 407–416 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  427. Y. Y. Gao, X. H. Li, W. L. Griffin, S. Y. O'Reilly and Y. F. Wang, Lithos, 2014, 192, 180–191 CrossRef PubMed.
  428. D. E. Granger, N. A. Lifton and J. K. Willenbring, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 2013, 125(9–10), 1379–1402 CrossRef PubMed.
  429. S. Merchel, W. Bremser, D. L. Bourles, U. Czeslik, J. Erzinger, N. A. Kummer, L. Leanni, B. Merkel, S. Recknagel and U. Schaefer, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2013, 298(3), 1871–1878 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  430. K. A. Dyl, J. S. Cleverley, P. A. Bland, C. G. Ryan, L. A. Fisher and R. M. Hough, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 2014, 134, 100–119 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  431. J. Osan, A. Keri, D. Breitner, M. Fabian, R. Dahn, R. Simon and S. Torok, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2014, 91, 12–23 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  432. L. P. Bedard and A. Neron, Geostand. Geoanal. Res., 2014, 38(2), 177–188 CAS.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015