Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

A boron-doped helicene as a highly soluble, benchtop-stable green emitter

Kai Schickedanz , Timo Trageser , Michael Bolte , Hans-Wolfram Lerner and Matthias Wagner *
Institut für Anorganische Chemie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Strasse 7, D-60438 Frankfurt (Main), Germany. E-mail: Matthias.Wagner@chemie.uni-frankfurt.de; Fax: +49 69 798 29260

Received 27th August 2015 , Accepted 9th September 2015

First published on 9th September 2015


Abstract

The high-yield synthesis of a boron-doped [4]helicene was achieved through a Ni-mediated Yamamoto C–C-coupling reaction; the moderate distortion of the molecular scaffold confers excellent solubility to the air- and water-stable green luminophore.


Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are important constituents of many organic optoelectronic materials. In order to optimise a given PAH for a specific application, one has to be able to adjust its frontier orbital energy levels and, in turn, its light absorption/emission characteristics and electron-accepting capacity. A very efficient approach relies on substitutional doping, i.e. the replacement of selected carbon atoms within the π-conjugated framework by other p-block elements.1

Among the possible dopants, N, P and S atoms lead to p-type materials, whereas B atoms give n-type PAHs, due to the inherently electron deficient and Lewis acidic nature of triarylboranes. For the fabrication of organic semiconductor devices, both p-type and n-type materials are required.2 Compared to the established p-type organic semiconductors, their B-doped congeners are far less well developed.3,4 Nevertheless, promising perspectives for the future already become evident: boron incorporation can lead to deeply coloured and/or highly luminescent compounds, capable of accepting electrons in a reversible manner and at comparatively low applied voltages.5 On the downside, many organoboranes are sensitive to air and moisture, such that sterically demanding substituents have to be attached for kinetic protection. Only in special cases, when three-coordinate B atoms constitute integral parts of a rigidly fixed cyclic skeleton, steric shielding is no longer necessary, because structural constraint disfavours adduct formation with Lewis bases, such as O2 and H2O.6,7 Unfortunately, extended rigid PAHs usually require solubilising sidechains to make them solution processable. Solubilising sidechains, similar to the kinetically shielding substituents mentioned above, tend to perturb intermolecular interactions in organic layers, which is detrimental to efficient charge-carrier transport.4

Compared to planar PAHs, the solubility of related helicenes is typically much higher.8 In addition, π-donor helicenes have been found to form charge-transfer complexes with numerous π-acceptors, thereby indicating that their twisted scaffold still permits significant interactions with neighbouring π-electron clouds.8,9 We therefore decided to prepare the B-doped [4]helicene 1 (Fig. 1) as a member of an attractive new class of target compounds for further materials development. The actual design of 1 takes into account that its phosphorus analogue 2 already exists,10 such that 1 and 2 would give a unique pair of isostructural n- and p-type compounds.


image file: c5cc07208e-f1.tif
Fig. 1 The B-doped PAH 1 and its P-doped congener 2; compound 1 can be viewed as a benzannulated [4]helicene (marked in green).

Hatakeyama et al. synthesised 2 from Ar–PCl2 through a tandem phospha-Friedel–Crafts reaction under carefully optimised conditions (Ar = 2,6-(naphth-1′-yl)2phenyl).10 Related electrophilic borylation reactions have also been published.11–13 Yet, after some exploratory experiments we decided against a tandem bora-Friedel–Crafts strategy and rather opted for a twofold C–C-coupling approach using the tetrahalogenated triarylboranes 5 and 6 as starting materials (Scheme 1). In the case of 5, we aimed at the intramolecular nucleophilic substitution of both fluorine atoms by naphthyl anions generated through iodine–lithium exchange.14


image file: c5cc07208e-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Synthesis of the B-doped [4]helicene 1 through intramolecular Yamamoto coupling on 6. Reagents and conditions: (i) (1) Et2O, 0 °C to rt, 3 d; (2) exc. Me3SiCl, Et2O, rt, 1 d. (ii) 2 equiv. t-BuLi, Et2O, −78 °C to rt, 12 h. (iii) 4 equiv. Ni(COD)2/COD/2,2′-bipy, THF, rt, 16 h.

For the transformation of 6 into 1, a Ni(0)-mediated reductive Yamamoto coupling reaction was chosen.15

The triarylboranes 5 and 6 were obtained from reactions of the potassium trifluoroborates 3 (X = F)16 or 4 (X = Br)17 with 2 equiv. of 8-iodo- or 8-bromonaphth-1-yllithium18,19 (Scheme 1). Treatment of 5 with t-BuLi did not furnish 1, but resulted in complex mixtures of unidentified products, irrespective of the stoichiometries (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]2, 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]4) and temperatures (−78 °C, 0 °C) applied or the solvents (Et2O, THF) employed. By contrast, the room-temperature reaction between the tetrabrominated derivative 6 and 4 equiv. of Ni(COD)2 in the presence of free COD and 2,2′-bipyridyl afforded the aimed-for product 1 in 86% yield. The benchtop-stable compound was purified by column chromatography on silica gel. 1 is highly soluble in various solvents, including hexane, C6H6 and CHCl3.

In line with the good solubility of 1, its solid-state structure reveals a twisted helical scaffold with a dihedral angle of 19.1(3)° between the phenylene rings establishing the fjord region of the molecule (Fig. 2). In stark contrast, a structurally related, partially fused trinaphthylborane, in which the carbon skeleton is forced into planarity, showed very poor solubility even in C6D5Cl at 120 °C.19 Each single crystal of 1 consists of molecules possessing the same absolute configuration (chiral space group P212121), which is indicative of a favourable interaction between the homochiral helicenes.8 The B–C bond lengths of 1 fall into the range of 1.532(13)–1.576(11) Å and are thus slightly shorter than those of the non-fused precursor 6 (1.572(7)–1.598(7) Å; Fig. 2). The boron atoms of 1 and 6 adopt trigonal-planar geometries.


image file: c5cc07208e-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Molecular structures of (a) compound 1 (top and side view), (b) the precursor 6 and (c) the pyridine adduct 1·py.

1 gives rise to a broad 11B NMR signal at 50 ppm, in good agreement with previous measurements on other B-doped PAHs.6,19,20 The most downfield-shifted proton resonance at δ = 8.79 belongs to the hydrogen atoms pointing into the fjord region of 1. The signals of the carbon atoms involved in the C–C-coupling reaction shift from 123.6/130.9 ppm (6) to 133.1/140.8 ppm (1).

The neat solid [4]helicene 1 possesses an orange colour. In cyclohexane solution, its longest-wavelength UV/vis absorption band appears at λmax = 462 nm with an onset at 485 nm (optical band gap EoptG = 2.6 eV; Fig. 3). However, only concentrated solutions appear yellow-orange to the naked eye, whereas dilute solutions of 1 look green because of the bright green fluorescence brought about by the absorption of daylight (in concentrated samples, the fluorescence is largely quenched due to self-absorption). Upon excitation at λex = 440 nm, cyclohexane solutions of 1 emit light with a wavelength of λem = 485 nm. Corresponding to the rigid molecular scaffold of 1, we note an appreciable quantum yield of QY = 81% and a rather small Stokes shift of 1026 cm−1. The fluorescence band shows only a small positive solvatochromism (e.g., λem = 485 nm (cyclohexane), 500 nm (CHCl3)), thereby proving that it has little charge-transfer character.


image file: c5cc07208e-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Normalised absorption (red) and emission (blue) spectra of 1 in cyclohexane (λex = 440 nm).

In the cyclic voltammogram of 1, a reversible redox event is visible at E1/2 = − 1.91 V (o-dichlorobenzene; vs. FcH/FcH+). An irreversible transition is observed in the anodic region with a peak potential Epa = 1.14 V and an onset of approximately 1.00 V (electrochemical band gap ECVG ≈ 2.9 eV).

Compound 1 is still sufficiently Lewis acidic to form a pale yellow pyridine adduct 1·py. It crystallises from a mixture of 1 and excess pyridine in toluene/heptane with two crystallographically independent molecules in the asymmetric unit (Fig. 2). The B–N bonds are rather long19 (1.693(7) Å, 1.695(7) Å) and the helical distortion of the PAH framework increases significantly upon adduct formation (dihedral angle between the terminal phenylene rings: 38.3(2)°/42.9(2)° (1·py) vs. 19.1(3)° (1)). As evidenced by the recurrence of the green fluorescence of 1, microcrystalline 1·py readily loses its pyridine ligand when exposed to a dynamic vacuum or even to a stream of nitrogen. In pyridine-d5, the 11B NMR signal of 1·py (−2 ppm) appears significantly upfield shifted compared to the resonance of the free Lewis acid 1 (50 ppm). Moreover, tetracoordination of the boron centre results in a significantly better shielding of all ortho-/para-CH carbon atoms.

First evidence for the successful derivatisation of 1 was gathered through its room-temperature bromination with N-bromosuccinimide in CHCl3.19,21 Even though the reaction is not selective, HPLC workup finally provided an identifiable product. According to mass spectrometry, we obtained monobrominated 1 (m/z = 416); NMR spectroscopy indicated an H/Br exchange at the former phenyl ring and meta to the B atom.

To summarise, the benchtop-stable [4]helicene 1, which contains a B atom in the ring junction, shows excellent solubility even in hexane. Solubilising or kinetically protecting substituents are not required. As a general concept, we therefore propose to exploit the moderate helical distortion of PAHs for the development of solution-processable optoelectronic materials.

Notes and references

  1. P. O. Dral, M. Kivala and T. Clark, J. Org. Chem., 2013, 78, 1894–1902 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. M. Stolar and T. Baumgartner, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15, 9007–9024 RSC.
  3. A. Escande and M. J. Ingleson, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 6257–6274 RSC.
  4. A. Narita, X.-Y. Wang, X. Feng and K. Müllen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 6616–6643 RSC.
  5. (a) C. D. Entwistle and T. B. Marder, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 2927–2931 CrossRef CAS; (b) S. Yamaguchi and A. Wakamiya, Pure Appl. Chem., 2006, 78, 1413–1424 CAS; (c) F. Jäkle, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 3985–4022 CrossRef PubMed; (d) Y.-L. Rao, H. Amarne and S. Wang, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2012, 256, 759–770 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) A. Lorbach, A. Hübner and M. Wagner, Dalton Trans., 2012, 41, 6048–6063 RSC.
  6. Z. Zhou, A. Wakamiya, T. Kushida and S. Yamaguchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 4529–4532 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. S. Saito, K. Matsuo and S. Yamaguchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 9130–9133 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. Y. Shen and C. F. Chen, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 1463–1535 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. O. Ermer and J. Neudörfl, Helv. Chim. Acta, 2001, 84, 1268–1313 CrossRef CAS.
  10. T. Hatakeyama, S. Hashimoto and M. Nakamura, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 2130–2133 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. M. J. Ingleson, Synthesis and Applications of Organoboron Compounds, in Topics in Organomet. Chem., ed. E. Fernández and A. Whiting, 2015, pp. 39–71 Search PubMed.
  12. T. Hatakeyama, S. Hashimoto, S. Seki and M. Nakamura, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 18614–18617 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. C. Reus, S. Weidlich, M. Bolte, H.-W. Lerner and M. Wagner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 12892–12907 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. M. Schulte and F. P. Gabbaï, J. Organomet. Chem., 2002, 643–644, 164–167 CrossRef CAS.
  15. (a) T. T. Tsou and J. K. Kochi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1979, 101, 7547–7560 CrossRef CAS; (b) T. Yamamoto, A. Morita, Y. Miyazaki, T. Maruyama, H. Wakayama, Z.-h. Zhou, Y. Nakamura, T. Kanbara, S. Sasaki and K. Kubota, Macromolecules, 1992, 25, 1214–1223 CrossRef CAS; (c) T. Yamamoto, S. Wakabayashi and K. Osakada, J. Organomet. Chem., 1992, 428, 223–237 CrossRef CAS; (d) J. H. Yao, C. Chi, J. Wu and K.-P. Loh, Chem. – Eur. J., 2009, 15, 9299–9302 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) E. C. Rüdiger, M. Porz, M. Schaffroth, F. Rominger and U. H. F. Bunz, Chem. – Eur. J., 2014, 20, 12725–12728 CrossRef PubMed.
  16. H.-J. Frohn, H. Franke, P. Fritzen and V. V. Bardin, J. Organomet. Chem., 2000, 598, 127–135 CrossRef CAS.
  17. S. Luliński, J. Smętek, K. Durka and J. Serwatowski, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2013, 8315–8322 CrossRef PubMed.
  18. H. O. House, D. G. Koepsell and W. J. Campbell, J. Org. Chem., 1972, 37, 1003–1011 CrossRef CAS.
  19. K. Matsuo, S. Saito and S. Yamaguchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 12580–12583 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. C. Dou, S. Saito, K. Matsuo, I. Hisaki and S. Yamaguchi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 12206–12210 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. C. Hoffend, K. Schickedanz, M. Bolte, H.-W. Lerner and M. Wagner, Tetrahedron, 2013, 69, 7073–7081 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Syntheses and NMR spectroscopic characterisations of 1, 4, 5, 6 and 1·py; details regarding the bromination of 1 with NBS; cyclic voltammogram and electronic spectra of 1. Single crystal X-ray structure analyses of CCDC 1420446 (1), 1420444 (5), 1420445 (6) and 1420447 (1·py). For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c5cc07208e

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.