Gerd Kaupp
Faculty V, Organic Chemistry 1, University of Oldenburg, Germany, Diekweg 15, D-26188 Edewecht, Germany. E-mail: gerd.kaupp@uni-oldenburg.de; Fax: +49 4486 920704
First published on 25th September 2006
Gas–solid and stoichiometric solid–solid reactions are usually quantitative and waste-free and thus particularly sustainable and environmentally benign. It is therefore shown how these can be scaled up with an emphasis for their use in chemical production. There is no necessity for purifying workup with solvent consumption (that means real solvent-freeness), waste disposal and other excessive energy input. These techniques avoid auxiliaries such as solvents, supports and catalysts, but the latter may be applied as gases with easy removal after reaction. Heat development is usually not a problem. Heat removal can be handled and is described also for extreme cases, as is the availability of equipment, in particular suitable milling techniques. The solid-state mechanism, which involves phase rebuilding (anisotropic molecular migrations within crystals), phase transformation and crystal disintegration, is the basics for the technical design. If (intermediate) melting cannot be avoided by cooling below eutectic temperatures, melt reactions at higher temperatures than required for solid-state reactions can be also rapid, uniform and quantitative, when direct crystallization of the product occurs. This version has an increased risk for side reactions as it does not profit from the crystal packing of the starting materials, but it profits from the crystal structure of the high melting product. For preparative purposes “large-scale” starts with the kg-range that can be easily reached in research institutes. It provides the basics for further scale up in industrial environments. Numerous typical examples are given for organic and some inorganic syntheses. These include solvent-free salt formations, complexations, condensations of amines, heterocyclic syntheses, Knoevenagel condensations, cascade reactions, halogen additions, stereo- and regio-specific protective reactions, and redox reactions. All of these may be of technical importance. Some of these involve now easily obtained products that cannot be achieved by solution reactions.
Fig. 1 Equipment proposals for the execution of larger scale gas–solid reactions. |
Some of the equipment questions have already been addressed1 for gas–solid and solid–solid reactions in horizontal ball mills at sizes up to 2 l and this will not be repeated here. Industrial mills of different types are in practical use for a number of commercial applications. Among these, vibration mills have to move the whole mass of the grinding chamber. This produces high noise levels and environmental vibrations; it limits the sizes and the speed of the milling tools. Furthermore, they are almost impossible to be operated under controlled condition of atmosphere or closed circuit. The same is valid for simple (drum-) ball mills with a rotating vessel.4 Jet mills use large streams of air or inert gas, which limits their use in reactive milling and the absence of grinding media excludes significant kinetic effects. Horizontal or vertical bead mills do not exhibit a significant kinetic impact since no high-level relative acceleration of the grinding tools occurs. They experience shear- and friction effects but not collision.5 Planetary ball mills and shaker mills are limited to laboratory size. The most suitable choice is horizontal rotary ball mills with cooling/heating mantle that can be operated in dry milling at high relative velocity of the grinding media (up to 14 m s−1) that cannot be reached by the other technical ball mills. Furthermore, they run under controlled conditions like vacuum, inert gas or in closed circuits.6 The systems are presently available from 0.5 to 400 l grinding chamber capacity,7 and larger volumes seem to be possible. They are already in wide industrial use for mechanical alloying of different metals and/or ceramics and production of nanocrystalline metal hydrides,8–11 due to an intensive grinding effect at low energy costs (e.g. 600 W at 1200 rpm of the 2 l version) and short process times with lowest contamination of the processed powders by the milling tools, since the process is based on the collision of grinding media rather than on shear and friction.
Fig. 2 shows two cross-sections of the rotary mill. The side view (a) depicts the optimized shape of the rotor that drives the balls at up to 1800 rpm. The steel balls (Cr6 or ceramics) are pushed towards the walls while the rotor spins (frontal cross-section b) and the reacting crystals are milled between the balls and the wall. The materials are stellite and hard metal or ceramics (e.g. Si3N4 or ZrO2, etc), the latter for handling strongly corrosive reagents or products (e.g. the gases Cl2, HCl, HBr, etc) or in pharmaceutical and food industry. The ball diameters are 5 mm and the fill is 2 kg for a 2 l and 100 kg for a 100 l production unit.
Fig. 2 Cross-sections through the milling chamber with rotor; (a) side-wise; (b) frontal while rotating with balls; courtesy of Zoz GmbH, Wenden, Germany. |
The 2 l version of the horizontal rotary ball mill (Simoloyer® CM01-2l) with air-lock for loading operation and unloading under vacuum and/or inert-gas has been imaged in ref. 1. It can be easily run in a university lab, as the vibrational impact is very low. The industrial 100 l rotary ball mill in a plant environment has two synchronous drive motors and a stable base (Fig. 3). Again, the milling compartment is not moved and that makes it versatile for the industrial production. We address here the most efficient patented milling principle at highest relative speed of the milling balls (14 m s−1) that is only available in the Zoz Simoloyer® horizontal rotary ball mills and depict here the larger 100 l production unit, while 400 l mills of that type are also available.
Fig. 3 100 l production unit of a Simoloyer® CM 100-s2 ball mill of Zoz GmbH, set for inert gas operation; courtesy of Zoz GmbH, Wenden, Germany. |
The milling-out after reaction is performed with a semi-batch internal gas cycle charging and separation system with discharge through a cyclone, as already imaged in ref. 1. A complete description is found in ref. 12. The powders are collected by an internal air or inert gas cycle through a cyclone of the connected separation/classification system (Simoloyer® VS01a). The latter system is particularly advantageous because it allows for automatic reloading for the next batches prior to complete powder collection. When this setup is not available in an academic environment, milling-out through a grate insert that keeps the balls can be performed simply under gravity or more rapidly with a stream of gas that may be enhanced by a vacuum cleaner with collection through a cyclone avoiding losses. Holdup is typically 10% but this counts only for the last batch. The preceding batches give the 100% yield of product with the same purity as the starting materials. Inert gas is used for sensitive solids preferably in the internal gas cycle version.
Caution:Do not mill explosive solids, as these might explode upon the heavy shocks despite the presence of the steel balls with high heat capacity.
Caution:Do not mill under enclosed air but under vacuum or inert gas if hydrogen or methane or other burning gas is a reaction product in order to avoid explosive gas mixtures.
Caution:Do not use milling for oxidations of highly reducing solid materials with oxidizing gases such as nitrogen dioxide or oxygen that might become violent with micronized dusts.
It is essential that the equipment be gas-tight. Gas–solid reactions in closed systems are usually performed with excess gas for complete reaction, the excess being recovered in cold traps. It is, however also possible to remove traces of exhaust gases down to the detection limit with excess solid and complete the chemical transformation of the solid in a second step with a suitable amount of the same gas. The gases are usually fed-in from pressure bottles. If vapors of low boiling liquids are applied a slightly higher temperature in the reaction vessel at the site of the crystals as compared to the connected vessel with the vaporizing liquid at a vacuum line must avoid gas condensation. More secure is the connection of the evacuated reaction vessel to a sufficiently large container with fully vaporized liquid at a vacuum line. The ratio of reacting and inert gas and the flow rate in the dynamic mode have to be carefully evaluated for any new reaction. It might be essential to increase the concentration of reacting gas towards the end of reaction in those cases.
Starting crystals should be >99% pure if pure products are aimed at without workup, as any minor impurities will persist in the product. However there may also be cases where impurities can be more easily removed (by extraction) from the quantitatively obtained product than from the starting material.13 In that case the stoichiometry must take into account the percentage of the minor impurity for avoiding excess of one reagent in the case of solid–solid reactions.
General procedure for solid–solid reaction in the 2 l mill that can be scaled for the range of 0.5 to 400 l for nearly thermoneutral production:
200 g quantities of stoichiometric mixtures of the loosely premixed crystalline reaction partners were fed to the 2 l stellite ball mill with hard metal rotor and 2 kg of 5 mm steel balls (Cr6) and tape-water cooling. The rotor speeds were 800–1300 min−1 (a maximum of 1800 min−1 is available). The time was mostly <30 min for complete conversion, the temperature at tape-water cooling was 14 °C at the walls and 20–30 °C in the center of the mill. Without cooling a maximum temperature of 40–60 °C was reached during milling for 30 min if the reaction was close to thermoneutral. Overall, a ΔG-value of <−6 kcal mol−1 is required for principally reversible quantitative overall processes including the contributions of the crystal energies. The product crystallites were usually sub-micrometer in diameter, but these often aggregated to clusters. The completeness of reaction was checked by suitable analytical techniques (IR, NMR, MS, DSC, etc). Milling-out by gravity or in a stream of air or inert gas for about 10 min was performed with varying rotor speeds for best results (600, 900, 1200 min−1). The next batch was loaded and the sequence repeated, etc. The yield per batch of pure product was 100% by weight on the average.
In the reaction with NaNO2 the reacting gas NO2 (in equilibrium with N2O4) was transformed to the product gas NO at 0.8 bar (ca. 0.07 mol in the 2 l mill with balls and reagent) and completely transformed by 30 min milling with an initial excess of NaNO2 (200 g), prior to collection by filling to a pressure bottle, prior to the next batch with NO2, etc until the reagent was completely transformed to NaNO3.
New solid-state reactions should be planned according to sections 1, 2, and 3. Furthermore, the presently reported examples and those in ref. 1 and 2 can serve as important guidelines. Ceramics mills and tools are available for corrosive situations. Melting must be avoided if the benefits of the crystal-packing bargain shall be used (melt reactions require considerably higher temperatures and run increased risk of side reactions). Therefore, cooling mantles (also usable for heating) must be provided at the mills and cooling below room temperature depends on the eutectic temperatures. If the melting points/eutectic temperatures are very low (e.g. benzaldehyde 16 and aniline 17), stoichiometric melt reactions without catalysts can be more profitable than cooling below −20 or −30 °C for solid-state production, in particular when no side reactions occur and if the product crystallizes directly at the higher reaction temperature. The worst choice would be dilution with solvents and addition of catalysts. While the heat capacity of mill, rotor, and balls is very high and many solid–solid reactions are almost thermoneutral, cooling is required for exothermic reactions to remove the heat. Excessively exothermic solid–solid reactions should be avoided. For example, solid acid and solid NaHCO3 should replace salt formations between solid acid and solid NaOH, etc. In solid–gas reactions extremely exothermic reactions (e.g. 1 bar CO2 and sodium alkoxides that would char) can be moderated and handled on a large scale by dilution of reacting gas and a flow of inert gas for heat removal (see Fig. 1 and 4). At moderately exothermic gas–solid reactions, larger crystals and constant feed of gas at lower pressure with external cooling bath are the method of choice (see Fig. 1 and e.g.31 or 36).
Fig. 4 Highly exothermic gas–solid reactions that require moderation by admixture of inert gas in flow systems. |
Every reactive crystal that accepts reagents for reaction by necessity exhibits cleavage planes or channels of sufficient size for enabling the molecular migrations of reagents and products in the phase rebuilding step. Surface passivation due to difficulties with phase transformation and disintegration of the phases is rarely observed with supramolecular crystals.1,2 These instances are automatically engineered to become successful by the milling for the solid–solid reactions. At gas–solid reactions milling should only be applied if passivation of the surfaces has been secured. It might be necessary to do it cautiously (for example, at low rate and low gas pressure) in order to avoid violent reaction.
The ingenious three-step phase-rebuilding solid-state mechanism avoids decrease of reactivity by solvation (as it occurs in solutions or melts). Therefore catalysis or activating substitution of the reagents is mostly unnecessary. It would be at the expense of atom economy and suitable melting points. For example, solid-state ester syntheses occur between the comparatively high melting acids and solid alcohols (for example oxalic acid and cholesterol, slightly heated in the 1 ∶ 2 ratio esterifies waste-free). It is not necessary to use esters (usually lower melting) or other activated acid derivatives or activated alcohol derivatives (all introducing wastes that are subject to removal) with the risk to end with liquids due to the spoiling liberated leaving groups. Other examples are amino acids (e.g.22 or cysteine, etc.1,2) that can be directly used in numerous solid-state reactions1,2 instead of activated amino acids, etc. The water of reaction here and in condensation reactions is often included as crystal water of the product and can be removed by evaporation in a vacuum. The addition of easily removable drying agents (for example MgSO4·2 H2O) is only necessary if the water of reaction separates from the crystals. Further favorable secondary products are gases that escape and may be collected as useful reagents. The choice of high melting starting materials is therefore also a choice of highest atom economy.
Equally important are hygroscopic ammonium salts of weak acids that can hardly be prepared in pure form from solutions. Again, exclusion of water is not a problem at all for gas–solid chemistry. This includes virtually all of the solid carboxylic acids but also phenols, imides and even 1,3-diketones (e.g. barbituric acid). The techniques are the same as in the reactions with HCl/HBr, and there is no reason why these should not be performed on a large scale.2 For example, the reactions of furan-2-carboxylic acid (7) with ammonia and of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (9) with methylamine have been performed at the 100 g scale with the rotovapor equipment and proper cooling.15
The solid–solid reactions of carboxylic acids and alkali hydroxides or alkali oxides are too violent for practical purposes. Therefore, the cheaper alkali (hydrogen)carbonates are the proper choice. The possibilities are manifold and it is avoided to dissolve the reactants in water, control the heat of neutralization and evaporate all of the water with very high energy consumption. If a dibasic acid such as (L)-(+)-tartaric acid (11) is needed as a food additive, either as the mono- (13) or disodium salt (12), it is only necessary to use either sodium hydrogencarbonate or sodium carbonate (for practical reasons as the solid monohydrate). These reactions have been performed as semi-continuous 200 g batches with quantitative yield and atmospheric air was the gas for the product collection from the mill.16 The solids are ready for use. Their dehydration will rarely be necessary.
Extremely exothermic acid–base reactions with 250 g quantities of alkali alcoholates and carbon dioxide (Fig. 4) have been moderated by inert gas admixture in the suspension bed technique (Fig. 1).17,18
The highly versatile and merchandisable carbonic acid half-ester salts cannot be synthesized in pure form from solution. The CO2 concentration had to be gradually increased in N2 inert gas and there was a sharp reaction front that was kept at temperatures below 50 °C (charring occurs in a static system). The powder volume increased considerably (Fig. 4), so that one-third or one-half of the column had to be provisioned for that. At the end of the reaction pure CO2 was applied and the closed column left overnight. The products titrated correctly, as the alcohol impurities in the starting materials were expelled during the reaction. A very detailed experimental description is given in ref. 2.
A careful selection of “acidity” makes it possible to quantitatively remove acetone below the detection limit from exhaust gases in flow rates that mimic industrial flows. The reagent is hydroxylammonium phosphate in stoichiometric mixture with K2HPO4·xH2O so that free acetone oxime (CH3)2CNOH is directly expelled from a two-column system at 80 °C together with the water, and the value added analytically pure KH2PO4 is the second useful product (1). A stream-bed approach with heated columns is applied here. The reacted column was contracted by less than 10%.
That procedure is also the easiest way to synthesize pure free acetone oxime when higher loads of acetone vapor might be applied. The acetone oxime was separated from water by continuous azeotropic removal with t-butyl methyl ether.14,21
(H2NOH)3·H3PO4 + K2HPO4·xH2O + 3 Me2CO → 3 Me2CNOH + 2 KH2PO4 + (x + 3) H2O | (1) |
Schiff bases are important intermediates, the liquid-state synthesis of which is usually performed with wasteful acid catalysis and exclusion/removal of water due to easy hydrolysis. If starting materials such as aniline (17) and benzaldehyde (16) have very low melting points their condensation cannot be run as solid-state reaction. It has thus been performed by 900 W microwave activation of 106 + 93 mg of the reagents after adsorption to 20 mg of montmorillonite K-10 clay at 110 °C and final extraction from the support with CH2Cl2.22 Unfortunately, this process became a “highlight of green chemistry” as a so-called “solvent-free” reaction.23 However, such an effort constitutes extreme waste production use solvent and energy misuse.
Another favorable solid-state effect can be used for turning this synthesis to a sustainable and benign production technique: the direct crystallization of the product (18) out of the stoichiometric undiluted liquid mixture of the reagents 16 and 17 at the reaction temperature. Thus, if 848 g of 99.5% technical aniline (17) and 744 g of 99.5% technical benzaldehyde (16) are mixed at 18 °C in a flat steel pan (31 × 44 cm2) a slightly exothermic reaction ensues with slightly exothermic crystallization (maximal temperatures were 32 and 35 °C) within 12 min. On the next day, the wet crystals were crunched with an ordinary household grain-mill and dried in a vacuum at room temperature to give 1.438 kg of pure benzylidene–aniline (18).2,24 This simple energy saving technique so extremely supersedes all waste producing previous techniques in all respects that it must be shown here: it also profits from crystal effects providing a sufficiently high melting point of 18. There are no problems with hydrolysis equilibrium in a slightly exothermic reaction directly providing the product crystals out of the liquid. Any very minor quantities of 16 and 17 that might still be dissolved in the separated water of reaction (126 g) had also formed the crystalline 18 upon the evaporative drying. The absence of an acid catalyst is very important for the resistance of the Schiff base 18 towards hydrolysis.
Solid derivatives of aniline and benzaldehyde work equally well by stoichiometric milling also with 200 g batches provided that the water of reaction is taken up as crystal water by the product.2 An example is the reaction of 19 and 20 giving pure 21 by 15 min milling without cooling at up to 50 °C.2 The crystal water can be removed at 80 °C in a vacuum without loss by hydrolysis.16,20
Similarly, there can not be reasonable doubts that large-scale solid-state syntheses of quinoxalines (some heating is required, but melt reactions require considerably higher temperatures) from o-phenylenediamines and benzils2 or enamine ketones from solid 1,3-diketones and solid aniline derivatives2 would also succeed in 200 g batches and beyond, as the crystals stay dry upon stoichiometric milling at room temperature. If the product crystals cannot take up the water of reaction in these and related condensation reactions, neat reaction is obtained by addition of an easily removable solid drying agent such as MgSO4·2H2O. Alternatively, the stoichiometric components can be separately micronized by milling, the dusts mixed and heated to the reaction temperature in vacuo for continuous removal of the water as it forms.2 Unlike solution reactions with acid catalysis, there are no problems with hydrolysis.
Solid secondary amines and carbonyl compounds (or their hydrates) give enamines, N/O-acetals, or azomethine ylides and elusive azomethine imines. 200 g batches have been successfully performed by stoichiometric milling of (L)-proline (22) with paraformaldehyde to give the stable N/O-acetal 23, which assumes the zwitterionic form by reprotonation and takes up the water of reaction (no hydrolysis in the absence of acid catalysts).2 The corresponding solid-state hydroxymethylation occurs also with imidazole (0 °C) and benzimidazole (r.t.). These reactions involve initial monomerization of paraformaldehyde to give formaldehyde by polymer chain breakage. Suitable crystal packings enable the inserting additions of formaldehyde by providing channels (22 and benzimidazole) or cleavage planes (imidazole) that permit the necessary molecular migrations within the crystal upon reaction.
A stoichiometric 200 g run of 22 and ninhydrin (24) gave quantitative three-cascade solid-state reaction to provide the pure azomethine ylide 25 in a large quantity (146 g, 100%) after 40 min milling without difficulties, even though the crystals did not accept all of the water of reaction. The complete collection of the product was achieved by four times milling-out of the holdup portion with 250 ml water each and collection of this part of the yield by centrifugation and drying.16 Clearly, the addition of a drying agent (MgSO4·2H2O) would have enabled the semicontinuous multi-batch processing followed by easy washing-out of the drying agent.
The pyrazolidinone 26 is a cyclic hydrazide that can loosen the H from the nitrogen next to the carbonyl group for water elimination after initial addition of the carbonyl group of 27. Thus, several stable azomethine imines 28 have been obtained by stoichiometric milling with solid benzaldehydes 27.2 Milling of the nitro-derivative 27 and 26 gave a quantitative yield of 28 (R = NO2) in a stoichiometric 200 g run. Thus, azomethine imines are now easily available on a large scale and there can be no doubt that 28 (R = Cl and Br) would also be quantitatively obtained on a larger scale and there is no hydrolysis due to the absence of an acid catalyst also upon removal of the crystal water from 28 at 80 °C in vacuum.
It is also possible to perform gas–solid amine condensations with vapors of liquid acetone or liquid amines. Thus, moderately large scale (20 g) cyclizing condensations have been performed with acetone vapor to the bis-hydrochloride 6, (DL)-penicillamine hydrochloride and (L)-cysteine hydrochloride.14 For example, the dihydro-1,5-benzodiazepine dihydrochloride 29·2 HCl hydrate and there from the free base 29 were quantitatively obtained if 20 g of o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride crystals (6) was placed in an evacuated 10 l desiccator and connected to a 100 ml flask with 11.6 g degassed frozen acetone. After removal of the cooling bath the acetone evaporated smoothly, and the system was left overnight. The excess acetone was condensed to a cold trap and the dihydrochloride dihydrate of 29 quantitatively obtained. It can be liberated to the free base 29 with aqueous NaOH.
Similarly, the thiazolidine hydrochlorides can be obtained from the above mentioned aminoacid salts. The latter two reactions cannot be performed with the free amino acids due to surface passivation that has been found by AFM studies. However, the milling of (L)-cysteine with paraformaldehyde yields quantitatively (R)-thiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid, as the milling breaks the passivation.25 The easy gas–solid synthesis of benzylidene alkylimides by reaction of gaseous methylamine or ethylamine with solid benzaldehydes25 is still awaiting its scale up.
Ring opening amine condensation with gaseous amines has been obtained with 500 g quantities of tetrachlorophthalic anhydride (30)
(mp 255 °C) and ethylamine. The ethylammonium salt 31 was quantitatively formed in a 2 L flask at the rotovapor equipment (Fig. 1) and cooling with a water bath of 14 °C. The ethylamine was continuously let in by adjusting the pressure to 0.5–0.8 bar with a needle valve. Due to aggregation of 40 µm particles that formed grains of 0.5–3 mm diameter the reaction had to be interrupted at 75% conversion. After grinding, the continued reaction was completed at 50 °C for a quantitative yield.26 Unsubstituted solid anhydrides were less suitable for this type of large-scale reaction due to high heat production, but the known phthalimide type ring openings with gaseous amines show promise for successful scale up. Furthermore, solid aromatic amines such as 33 do not produce much heat upon reaction with phthalic anhydride (32) and can be stoichiometrically milled in 200 g batches with quantitative yield at room temperature for 1 h.15 The product 34 is free from bisamide side products, which occur upon reaction in solution or in the melt. The solid-state synthesis of this antibacterial sulfonamide phthalazole (34) was first described in ref. 27.
Numerous solid thiohydantoins were quantitatively ring opened with gaseous amines to give thioureido-acetamides (36)28 that are versatile building blocks in organic synthesis.29 These can be obtained in larger quantities, for example by reacting 100 g of thiohydantoin (35)
(mp 231 °C) with methylamine in a 2 l flask at the rotovapor equipment (Fig. 1) with continuous addition of the gas at 0.8 bar and cooling with a water bath of 14 °C. After the gas uptake ceased, the setup was filled to 1 bar of the reacting gas and left overnight for a quantitative yield (127 g) of 36 after recovery of the excessive gas to a cold trap.15 The specific cleavage site is between N and CO.
The industrially important enantiopure cholesterol dibromide 47 from solid–gas synthesis does not require purifying workup and has better properties than the wastefully produced 47 from acetic acid solution. The remarkable specific tetrabromination of 48 provides 49 as a useful core for dendrimers. Compound 49 is quantitatively obtained in pure form. The gases have to be efficiently mixed by rotation of the reaction vessel during reaction. Hydrobromic acid is a useful couple product for further use after separation from a slight excess of bromine by vacuum distillation while thawing the cold trap from −196 to −78 °C.
The stereo- and regiospecificity in the waste-free syntheses of (2R,3R,4R,5R)-52 or rac-54 by stoichiometric milling of 50 or 53 with 51 at room temperature or 95 °C, respectively,36 are remarkable. The reacting crystals exhibit proper channels for the necessary molecular migrations.
An interesting production of the valuable gas nitrogen monoxide uses the reaction of nitrogen dioxide with sodium nitrite crystals (layered structure) (2). This reaction requires milling as the crystal surface passivates itself in this process.
NO2 + NaNO2 → NO + NaNO3 | (2) |
The synthesis is performed with 200 g batches of NaNO2 in the 2 l horizontal ball mill by filling with 0.8 bar of the brown NO2 gas (0.07 mol) and collecting the colorless NO gas in a pressure bottle after 30 min milling. The reaction is continued with fresh NO2 until all NaNO2 has been transformed, etc.16
Complex salts can be easily produced by stoichiometric milling and also safely with highly poisonous powders in 200 g batches. This has been verified with copper cyanide (νCN = 2164 cm−1) and sodium cyanide (νCN = 2091 cm−1) in quantitative reactions for the production of the complex salts that are important in galvanotechniques. Depending on the molar ratio the different complex salts in (3), (4), and (5) are obtained.16
CuCN + NaCN → Na [Cu(CN)2] (νCN = 2112 cm−1) | (3) |
CuCN + 2 NaCN → Na2 [Cu(CN)3] (νCN = 2109 cm−1) | (4) |
CuCN + 3 NaCN → Na3 [Cu(CN)4] (νCN = 2080 cm−1) | (5) |
Elementary sulfur is very corrosive to metals when ball milled. Even the steel milling materials are attacked and therefore ceramic mills should be used, but the stellite housing and hard-metal rotor were sufficiently resistant when ZrO2 balls were used. 200 g stoichiometric batches have been successfully performed with copper (6), (7) and iron (8) powders.16 These were chosen due to the importance of Cu2S as a useful solid for the production of luminophores and thermoelements, whereas FeS is used for the generation of H2S. Interestingly, changing the molar ratio of copper and sulfur allows also the clean synthesis of CuS.
16 Cu + S8 → 8 Cu2S | (6) |
8 Cu + S8 → 8 CuS | (7) |
8 Fe + S8 → 8 FeS | (8) |
The S8-reactions require mechanochemical S–S bond breakages by the milling prior to the chemical reaction. These waste-free low-temperature syntheses may be useful and many applications of sulfur and pyrite for the synthesis of metal sulfides might be envisaged.
Also high melting oxides such as lead oxide (orthorhombic, layered structure; mp 888 °C after phase transition at 490 °C to layered tetragonal structure) and chromium trioxide (mp 197 °C) combine to Chrome yellow (lead chromate, salt, mp 844 °C) (9), which can be further transformed to Chrome red with additional lead oxide by stoichiometric milling at room temperature (10). Some mixed oxides are important as ferroelectrica (PLZT ceramics) with high dielectric constants for optoelectronic and piezoelectric applications. Surprisingly, the high kinetic stoichiometric reactive milling (14 m s−1) also produced lead titanate (mp 450 °C) in 400 g batches with PbO (mp 888 °C) and titanium dioxide (rutile or anatase, mp 1830–1850 °C) (11). The syntheses with TiO2 must rely on tribochemical reactions, as metal–O covalent bonds must be broken from the infinite 3-D structures (exhibiting channels in rutile and anatase). Numerous further applications await their exploration (e.g. PtO2 + H2 in the presence of channels, etc).
PbO + CrO3 → PbCrO4 | (9) |
PbCrO4 + PbO → PbO·PbCrO4 | (10) |
PbO + TiO2 → PbTiO3 | (11) |
Solid-state chemical production appears very worthy of being emphasized. The single products obtained do not require purifying workup when starting with pure crystalline compounds and their prior dissolution in solvents for waste-producing liquid-state reactions should be avoided whenever possible.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006 |