Issue 10, 2012

A comparative study on in vitro enzymatic degradation of poly(glycerol sebacate) and poly(xylitol sebacate)

Abstract

Poly(glycerol sebacate) (PGS) is a soft elastomer suitable for tissue engineering of soft types. However, the rapid degradation kinetics of this polyester has become one of the major drawbacks in the application of tissue engineering. In this work, a comparative study on in vitro enzymatic degradation of PGS- and poly(xylitol sebacate) (PXS)-based materials has been conducted, using a recently established in vitro experimental protocol. This protocol, which can simulate and predict in vivo enzymatic degradation kinetics of polymer implants, was further refined in this work. The comparative study was conducted in tissue culture medium and a buffer solution of pH optima, under static and cyclic mechanical loading conditions. It was found that in vitro enzymatic degradation rates of the PXS-based materials were significantly slower than those of PGS in both the tissue culture medium and buffered solution of pH optima (pH 8). The in vitro enzymatic degradation of PGS-based biomaterials tested was about 0.1–0.4 mm month−1 in tissue culture medium, while the rates were in the range of 0.05–0.2 mm month−1 for PXS-based materials. Enzymatic degradation was enhanced in relation to mechanical deformation, whereas PXS-based materials were influenced little. Hence, PXS, which is as soft as PGS but degrades significantly slower than PGS, is a better option for applications in tissue engineering of soft types.

Graphical abstract: A comparative study on in vitro enzymatic degradation of poly(glycerol sebacate) and poly(xylitol sebacate)

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
19 Jan 2012
Accepted
27 Feb 2012
First published
20 Mar 2012

RSC Adv., 2012,2, 4125-4134

A comparative study on in vitro enzymatic degradation of poly(glycerol sebacate) and poly(xylitol sebacate)

Q. Chen, X. Yang and Y. Li, RSC Adv., 2012, 2, 4125 DOI: 10.1039/C2RA20113E

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements