Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 12, 2015
Previous Article Next Article

The effect of sequence context on the activity of cytosine DNA glycosylases

Author affiliations

Abstract

We have prepared single (N204D) and double (N204D:L272A) mutants of human uracil DNA glycosylase (hUDG), generating two cytosine DNA glycosylases (hCDG and hCYDG). Both these enzymes are able to excise cytosine (but not 5-methylcytosine), when this base is part of a mismatched base pair. hCDG is more active than the equivalent E. coli enzyme (eCYDG) and also has some activity when the cytosine is paired with guanine, unlike eCYDG. hCDG also has some activity against single stranded DNA, while having poor activity towards an unnatural base pair that forces the cytosine into an extrahelical conformation (in contrast to eCYDG for which a bulky base enhances the enzyme's activity). We also examined how sequence context affects the activity of these enzymes, determining the effect of flanking base pairs on cleavage efficiency. An abasic site or a hexaethylene glycol linker placed opposite the target cytosine, also causes an increase in activity compared with an AC mismatch. Flanking an AC mismatch with GC base pairs resulted in a 100-fold decrease in excision activity relative to flanking AT base pairs and the 5′-flanking base pair had a greater effect on the rate of cleavage. However, this effect is not simply due to the stability of the flanking base pairs as adjacent GT mismatches also produce low cleavage efficiency.

Graphical abstract: The effect of sequence context on the activity of cytosine DNA glycosylases

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Publication details

The article was received on 07 Aug 2015, accepted on 04 Oct 2015 and first published on 07 Oct 2015


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C5MB00532A
Author version available: Download Author version (PDF)
Citation: Mol. BioSyst., 2015,11, 3273-3278
  •   Request permissions

    The effect of sequence context on the activity of cytosine DNA glycosylases

    S. T. Kimber, T. Brown and K. R. Fox, Mol. BioSyst., 2015, 11, 3273
    DOI: 10.1039/C5MB00532A

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements