Issue 1, 2008

A comparison of speciated atmospheric mercury at an urban center and an upwind rural location

Abstract

Gaseous elemental mercury (GEM), particulate mercury (PHg) and reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) were measured every other hour at a rural location in south central Wisconsin (Devil’s Lake State Park, WI, USA) between April 2003 and March 2004, and at a predominantly downwind urban site in southeastern Wisconsin (Milwaukee, WI, USA) between June 2004 and May 2005. Annual averages of GEM, PHg, and RGM at the urban site were statistically higher than those measured at the rural site. Pollution roses of GEM and reactive mercury (RM; sum of PHg and RGM) at the rural and urban sites revealed the influences of point source emissions in surrounding counties that were consistent with the US EPA 1999 National Emission Inventory and the 2003–2005 US EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Source-receptor relationships at both sites were studied by quantifying the impacts of point sources on mercury concentrations. Time series of GEM, PHg, and RGM concentrations were sorted into two categories; time periods dominated by impacts from point sources, and time periods dominated by mercury from non-point sources. The analysis revealed average point source contributions to GEM, PHg, and RGM concentration measurements to be significant over the year long studies. At the rural site, contributions to annual average concentrations were: GEM (2%; 0.04 ng m–3); and, RM (48%; 5.7 pg m–3). At the urban site, contributions to annual average concentrations were: GEM (33%; 0.81 ng m–3); and, RM (64%; 13.8 pg m–3).

Graphical abstract: A comparison of speciated atmospheric mercury at an urban center and an upwind rural location

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
05 Jul 2007
Accepted
18 Oct 2007
First published
31 Oct 2007

J. Environ. Monit., 2008,10, 102-108

A comparison of speciated atmospheric mercury at an urban center and an upwind rural location

A. P. Rutter, J. J. Schauer, G. C. Lough, D. C. Snyder, C. J. Kolb, S. Von Klooster, T. Rudolf, H. Manolopoulos and M. L. Olson, J. Environ. Monit., 2008, 10, 102 DOI: 10.1039/B710247J

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements