Issue 2, 2011

Hybrid and biohybrid silicate based materials: molecular vs. block-assembling bottom–up processes

Abstract

This critical review introduces a discussion on the influence of preparative procedures (nanofabrication) of nanostructured hybrids and biohybrids, comparing their structural and textural characteristics that determine the properties of the resulting materials. Selected examples of silicate-based hybrids of analogous compositions prepared by both molecular and blocks-assembly bottom–up strategies are discussed to show advantages and inconveniences of each methodology (341 references).

Graphical abstract: Hybrid and biohybrid silicate based materials: molecular vs. block-assembling bottom–up processes

Article information

Article type
Critical Review
Submitted
23 Jul 2010
First published
13 Dec 2010

Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011,40, 801-828

Hybrid and biohybrid silicate based materials: molecular vs. block-assembling bottom–up processes

E. Ruiz-Hitzky, P. Aranda, M. Darder and M. Ogawa, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 801 DOI: 10.1039/C0CS00052C

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements