Emerging processing guidelines for solid electrolytes in the era of oxide-based solid-state batteries

Abstract

The current most mature, competitive, and dominant battery technology for electric vehicles (EVs) is the Li-ion battery (LIB). As future EVs will rely on battery technology, further innovation is essential for the success of mobility electrification towards improving the driving range and reducing the charging time and price competitiveness. The commonly cited next generation technologies are hybrid and solid-state batteries (SSBs) enabling high energy densities using lithium. Through a critical approach, we dismantle the oxide-based solid-state battery electrolytes, their chemistries and ceramic manufacture. We evaluate the relevance of solid-state electrolytes and their integration into battery types compared to Li-ion batteries considering a holistic life cycle thinking of sustainable battery production. We evaluate the relevant oxide-based materials and requirements, the material supply chain, and diverse recycling concepts. We raise critical questions about the development of oxide-based SSBs mainly for large-scale production and EV applications, which demand attention to fill current scientific and technological gaps. Next, we critically discuss three major ceramic synthesis routes toward oxide-based solid electrolytes: solid-state processing, wet-chemical solution processing, and vapor deposition. In-depth processing guidelines, hindrances, and opportunities are highlighted. Through a high-level approach, the advantages and disadvantages of each processing method are introduced, while accounting for four major processing metrics applicable for obtaining high Li-ion conducting solid-state Li oxide electrolytes: chemistry of the precursors, dopants and stoichiometry, synthesis temperature, and atmosphere and pressure. We broaden the processing discussion from a single electrolyte component to electrode/electrolyte tandems examining interfaces during cell fabrication, possible cell architectures, design-specific processing methods, challenges, and mitigating solutions for both bulk-type batteries and thin film batteries. Finally, future perspectives and key guidelines for the realization of all SSBs are analyzed and discussed.

Graphical abstract: Emerging processing guidelines for solid electrolytes in the era of oxide-based solid-state batteries

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Review Article
Submitted
02 Apr 2025
First published
04 Sep 2025
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY-NC license

Chem. Soc. Rev., 2025, Advance Article

Emerging processing guidelines for solid electrolytes in the era of oxide-based solid-state batteries

M. Balaish, K. J. Kim, H. Chu, Y. Zhu, J. C. Gonzalez-Rosillo, L. Kong, H. Paik, S. Weinmann, Z. D. Hood, J. Hinricher, L. J. Miara and J. L. M. Rupp, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2025, Advance Article , DOI: 10.1039/D5CS00358J

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications, without requesting further permission from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given and it is not used for commercial purposes.

To request permission to reproduce material from this article in a commercial publication, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party commercial publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements