Issue 27, 2022

Evaluating commercial thermoplastic materials in fused deposition modeling 3D printing for their compatibility with DNA storage and analysis by quantitative polymerase chain reaction

Abstract

Nucleic acids are ubiquitous in biological samples and can be sensitively detected using nucleic acid amplification assays. To achieve highly accurate and reliable results, nucleic acid isolation and purification is often required and can limit the accessibility of these assays. Encapsulation of these workflows onto a single device may be achieved through fabrication methodologies featuring commercial three-dimensional (3D) printers. This study aims to characterize fused deposition modeling (FDM) filaments based on their compatibility with nucleic acid storage using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). To study the adsorption of nucleic acids, storage vessels were fabricated using six common thermoplastics including: polylactic acid (PLA), nylon, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), co-polyester (CPE), polycarbonate (PC), and polypropylene (PP). DNA adsorption of a short 98 base pair and a longer 830 base pair fragment to the walls of the vessel was shown to vary significantly among the polymer materials as well as the color varieties of the same polymer. PLA storage vessels were found to adsorb the least amount of the 98 base pair DNA after 12 hours of storage in 2.5 M NaCl TE buffer whereas the ABS and PC vessels adsorbed up to 97.2 ± 0.2% and 97.5 ± 0.2%. DNA adsorption could be reduced by decreasing the layer height of the 3D printed object, thereby increasing the functionality of the ABS storage vessel. Nylon was found to desorb qPCR inhibiting components into the stored solution which led to erroneous DNA quantification data from qPCR analysis.

Graphical abstract: Evaluating commercial thermoplastic materials in fused deposition modeling 3D printing for their compatibility with DNA storage and analysis by quantitative polymerase chain reaction

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
11 May 2022
Accepted
19 Jun 2022
First published
20 Jun 2022
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

Anal. Methods, 2022,14, 2682-2688

Evaluating commercial thermoplastic materials in fused deposition modeling 3D printing for their compatibility with DNA storage and analysis by quantitative polymerase chain reaction

D. R. Eitzmann and J. L. Anderson, Anal. Methods, 2022, 14, 2682 DOI: 10.1039/D2AY00772J

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements