Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 10, 2017
Previous Article Next Article

Labelled sunscreen SPFs may overestimate protection in natural sunlight

Author affiliations

Abstract

Limited evidence exists to indicate that sunscreen protection factors determined in the laboratory are higher than those in natural sunlight. In this article we propose an explanation for this difference and estimate the expected SPFs of sunscreen products in natural sunlight and those expected from laboratory testing. Our results indicate that the labelled SPF, determined by in vivo assay using a UV solar simulator, overestimates the SPF that would be expected in natural sunlight to the extent that for products labelled SPF50+, it may not be possible to achieve a protection against sunlight of more than 25-fold. The popular interpretation of the SPF that it can be thought of as how much longer skin covered with sunscreen takes to burn in sunlight compared with unprotected skin, can no longer be defended.

Graphical abstract: Labelled sunscreen SPFs may overestimate protection in natural sunlight

Back to tab navigation

Publication details

The article was received on 10 Jul 2017, accepted on 10 Aug 2017 and first published on 11 Aug 2017


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C7PP00260B
Citation: Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2017,16, 1519-1523
  •   Request permissions

    Labelled sunscreen SPFs may overestimate protection in natural sunlight

    B. Diffey and U. Osterwalder, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2017, 16, 1519
    DOI: 10.1039/C7PP00260B

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements