Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 1, 2017
Previous Article Next Article

Language of mechanisms: exam analysis reveals students' strengths, strategies, and errors when using the electron-pushing formalism (curved arrows) in new reactions

Author affiliations

Abstract

This study investigated students' successes, strategies, and common errors in their answers to questions that involved the electron-pushing (curved arrow) formalism (EPF), part of organic chemistry's language. We analyzed students' answers to two question types on midterms and final exams: (1) draw the electron-pushing arrows of a reaction step, given the starting materials and products; and (2) draw the products of a reaction step, given the starting materials and electron-pushing arrows. For both question types, students were given unfamiliar reactions. The goal was for students to gain proficiency—or fluency—using and interpreting the EPF. By first becoming fluent, students should have lower cognitive load demands when learning subsequent concepts and reactions, positioning them to learn more deeply. Students did not typically draw reversed or illogical arrows, but there were many other error types. Scores on arrows questions were significantly higher than on products questions. Four factors correlated with lower question scores, including: compounds bearing implicit atoms, intramolecular reactions, assessment year, and the conformation of reactants drawn on the page. We found little evidence of analysis strategies such as expanding or mapping structures. We also found a new error type that we describe as picking up electrons and setting them down on a different atom. These errors revealed the difficulties that arose even before the students had to consider the chemical meaning and implications of the reactions. Herein, we describe our complete findings and suggestions for instruction, including videos that we created to teach the EPF.

Back to tab navigation
Please wait while Download options loads

Publication details

The article was received on 01 Jun 2016, accepted on 04 Oct 2016 and first published on 04 Oct 2016


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C6RP00126B
Citation: Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2017,18, 64-77
  •   Request permissions

    Language of mechanisms: exam analysis reveals students' strengths, strategies, and errors when using the electron-pushing formalism (curved arrows) in new reactions

    A. B. Flynn and R. B. Featherstone, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2017, 18, 64
    DOI: 10.1039/C6RP00126B

Search articles by author