Issue 7, 2015

Relative energies of water nanoclusters (H2O)20: comparison of empirical and nonempirical double-hybrids with generalized energy-based fragmentation approach

Abstract

Double-hybrid (DH) approximations have proved to be powerful tools for computing various properties through the density functional theory (DFT). In the present work, we analyze the performances of some recently proposed parameterized (empirical) and parameter-free (nonempirical) DH density functionals based on Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) and Becke–Lee–Yang–Parr (BLYP) approximations along with their parent methods for predicting the relative energies of 10 low-energy isomers of water nanoclusters (H2O)20. As a reference to benchmark the performance of functionals, we employ a novel methodology based on generalized energy-based fragmentation (GEBF) approach, in which canonical Hartree–Fock (HF) total energy is combined with the GEBF-CCSD(T) correlation energy, GEBF-CCSD(T)/HF, at the complete basis set limit. It is shown that the PBE-based functionals perform better than the functionals that include BLYP approximation. Of the tested parameterized DHs, B2GP-PLYP performs the best, while among the family of parameter-free models, the PBE-QIDH functional outperforms others. Putting all the results together, the parameter-free adiabatic connection-based functional PBE-QIDH is found to be superior for overall performance. Dissecting the role of both exact exchange and second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) correlation on the relative energies of water 20-mers, we find that a particular compromise between the two weights is needed to reach a reasonable accuracy. However, it turns out that it is difficult to use the DH approximations to predict the correct relative order of stabilities for the considered water nanoclusters. On the whole, this study points out that if the computational cost is not a serious bottleneck for DH density functional computations on large nanostructures and nanomaterials, older approximations can be superseded by new DHs with the aim of reaching the increased accuracy.

Graphical abstract: Relative energies of water nanoclusters (H2O)20: comparison of empirical and nonempirical double-hybrids with generalized energy-based fragmentation approach

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
01 Apr 2015
Accepted
12 May 2015
First published
26 May 2015

New J. Chem., 2015,39, 5534-5539

Relative energies of water nanoclusters (H2O)20: comparison of empirical and nonempirical double-hybrids with generalized energy-based fragmentation approach

M. Alipour, New J. Chem., 2015, 39, 5534 DOI: 10.1039/C5NJ00817D

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements