Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 1, 2015
Previous Article Next Article

Influence of single- and double-flame spray pyrolysis on the structure of MnOx/γ-Al2O3 and FeOx/γ-Al2O3 catalysts and their behaviour in CO removal under lean exhaust gas conditions

Author affiliations

Abstract

MnOx/Al2O3 and FeOx/Al2O3 samples were prepared by two-nozzle flame spray pyrolysis to minimize the formation of composite phases. For this purpose, manganese(II) naphthenate or iron(II) naphthenate and aluminium-sec-butylate were sprayed in separate flames and both the structure and the catalytic performance of the materials in CO oxidation were compared to the corresponding single-nozzle flame spray pyrolysis catalysts. Characterization by X-ray diffraction, diffuse reflectance UV-vis spectroscopy and X-ray absorption near-edge structure unravelled that the phases formed in double-flame spray pyrolysis (DFSP) were significantly different from those in single-flame spray pyrolysis; highly dispersed separate entities of manganese/iron oxide and alumina were identified in this case. Despite a slightly lower BET surface area the DFSP prepared samples performed generally better in catalytic CO oxidation than those derived from one single flame. In addition, the manganese-based catalysts were more effective for CO conversion than the corresponding iron-based samples, even at low concentrations.

Graphical abstract: Influence of single- and double-flame spray pyrolysis on the structure of MnOx/γ-Al2O3 and FeOx/γ-Al2O3 catalysts and their behaviour in CO removal under lean exhaust gas conditions

Back to tab navigation

Publication details

The article was received on 03 Jun 2014, accepted on 24 Aug 2014 and first published on 02 Sep 2014


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C4CY00727A
Citation: Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015,5, 455-464
  • Open access: Creative Commons BY license
  •   Request permissions

    Influence of single- and double-flame spray pyrolysis on the structure of MnOx/γ-Al2O3 and FeOx/γ-Al2O3 catalysts and their behaviour in CO removal under lean exhaust gas conditions

    M. Tepluchin, D. K. Pham, M. Casapu, L. Mädler, S. Kureti and J. Grunwaldt, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, 5, 455
    DOI: 10.1039/C4CY00727A

    This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. Material from this article can be used in other publications provided that the correct acknowledgement is given with the reproduced material.

    Reproduced material should be attributed as follows:

    • For reproduction of material from NJC:
      [Original citation] - Published by The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) on behalf of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and the RSC.
    • For reproduction of material from PCCP:
      [Original citation] - Published by the PCCP Owner Societies.
    • For reproduction of material from PPS:
      [Original citation] - Published by The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) on behalf of the European Society for Photobiology, the European Photochemistry Association, and RSC.
    • For reproduction of material from all other RSC journals:
      [Original citation] - Published by The Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Information about reproducing material from RSC articles with different licences is available on our Permission Requests page.

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements