Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 45, 2015
Previous Article Next Article

Can HN[double bond, length as m-dash]NH, FN[double bond, length as m-dash]NH, or HN[double bond, length as m-dash]CHOH bridge the σ-hole and the lone pair at P in binary complexes with H2XP, for X = F, Cl, NC, OH, CN, CCH, CH3, and H?

Author affiliations

Abstract

Ab initio MP2/aug′-cc-pVTZ calculations have been carried out to investigate the properties of complexes formed between H2XP, for X = F, Cl, NC, OH, CN, CCH, CH3, and H, and the possible bridging molecules HN[double bond, length as m-dash]NH, FN[double bond, length as m-dash]NH, and HN[double bond, length as m-dash]CHOH. H2XP:HNNH and H2XP:FNNH complexes are stabilized by P⋯N pnicogen bonds, except for H2(CH3)P:FNNH and H3P:FNNH which are stabilized by N–H⋯P hydrogen bonds. H2XP:HNCHOH complexes are stabilized by P⋯N pnicogen bonds and nonlinear O–H⋯P hydrogen bonds. For a fixed H2XP molecule, binding energies decrease in the order HNCHOH > HNNH > FNNH, except for the binding energies of H2(CH3)P and H3P with HNNH and FNNH. Binding energies of complexes with HNCHOH and HNNH increase as the P–N1 distance decreases, but binding energies of complexes with FNNH show little dependence on this distance. The large binding energies of H2XP:HNCHOH complexes arise from a cooperative effect involving electron-pair acceptance by P to form a pnicogen bond, and electron-pair donation by P to form a hydrogen bond. The dominant charge-transfer interaction in these complexes involves electron-pair donation by N across the pnicogen bond, except for complexes in which X is one of the more electropositive substituents, CCH, CH3, and H. For these, lone-pair donation by P across the hydrogen bond dominates. AIM and NBO data for these complexes are consistent with their bonding characteristics, showing molecular graphs with bond critical points and charge-transfer interactions associated with hydrogen and pnicogen bonds. EOM-CCSD spin–spin coupling constants 1pJ(P–N) across the pnicogen bond for each series of complexes correlate with the P–N distance. In contrast, 2hJ(O–P) values for complexes H2XP:HNCHOH do not correlate with the O–P distance, a consequence of the nonlinearity of these hydrogen bonds.

Graphical abstract: Can HN [[double bond, length as m-dash]] NH, FN [[double bond, length as m-dash]] NH, or HN [[double bond, length as m-dash]] CHOH bridge the σ-hole and the lone pair at P in binary complexes with H2XP, for X = F, Cl, NC, OH, CN, CCH, CH3, and H?

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Publication details

The article was received on 29 Sep 2015, accepted on 21 Oct 2015 and first published on 21 Oct 2015


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C5CP05832E
Author version available: Download Author version (PDF)
Citation: Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015,17, 30729-30735
  •   Request permissions

    Can HN[double bond, length as m-dash]NH, FN[double bond, length as m-dash]NH, or HN[double bond, length as m-dash]CHOH bridge the σ-hole and the lone pair at P in binary complexes with H2XP, for X = F, Cl, NC, OH, CN, CCH, CH3, and H?

    J. E. Del Bene, I. Alkorta and J. Elguero, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 30729
    DOI: 10.1039/C5CP05832E

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements