Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 22, 2015
Previous Article Next Article

Rare stoichiometry of carboxyl–carboxylate benzbetaine complexes: in vitro versus in silico

Author affiliations

Abstract

The first betaine–mineral acid complex of 3 : 2 stoichiometry, as well as a 1 : 1 complex common for this class of compounds, has been obtained. Crystalline [di-(3-trimethylammonium-benzoic acid)–(3-trimethylammonium-benzoate)]diiodide (1) is the only betaine–mineral acid 3 : 2 complex obtained so far. Two concomitant polymorphs of this 3 : 2 complex, 1-I and 1-II, have been isolated and characterized by X-ray diffraction and FTIR spectroscopy. Polymorphs 1-I, of monoclinic space group P21/c, and 1-II, of orthorhombic space group Pccn, have very similar lattices and aggregates of one zwitterionic molecule and two cations O–H⋯O bonded into a 3-membered catemeric carboxyl–carboxylate–carboxyl interval, but polymorph 1-II dissolves better in methanol than 1-I. Alternative hypothetical aggregates of 3-trimethylammonium-benzoate hydroiodide 1 : 1, 2 : 1 and 3 : 2 complexes optimized at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level of theory suggest that the betaine-to-acid 3 : 2 stoichiometry is favoured at the stage of small cluster aggregation and not due to the complex crystal packing preferences.

Graphical abstract: Rare stoichiometry of carboxyl–carboxylate benzbetaine complexes: in vitro versus in silico

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Publication details

The article was received on 09 Jan 2015, accepted on 19 Apr 2015 and first published on 23 Apr 2015


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C5CE00054H
Citation: CrystEngComm, 2015,17, 4143-4149
  •   Request permissions

    Rare stoichiometry of carboxyl–carboxylate benzbetaine complexes: in vitro versus in silico

    K. Ostrowska, I. Kowalczyk, M. Kaźmierczak, A. Katrusiak, M. Szafran, A. Komasa and Z. Dega-Szafran, CrystEngComm, 2015, 17, 4143
    DOI: 10.1039/C5CE00054H

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements