Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 15, 2015
Previous Article Next Article

A uniform measurement expression for cross method comparison of nanoparticle aggregate size distributions

Author affiliations

Abstract

Available measurement methods for nanomaterials are based on very different measurement principles and hence produce different values when used on aggregated nanoparticle dispersions. This paper provides a solution for relating measurements of nanomaterials comprised of nanoparticle aggregates determined by different techniques using a uniform expression of a mass equivalent diameter (MED). The obtained solution is used to transform into MED the size distributions of the same sample of synthetic amorphous silica (nanomaterial comprising aggregated nanoparticles) measured by six different techniques: scanning electron microscopy in both high vacuum (SEM) and liquid cell setup (Wet-SEM); gas-phase electrophoretic mobility molecular analyzer (GEMMA); centrifugal liquid sedimentation (CLS); nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA); and asymmetric flow field flow fractionation with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry detection (AF4-ICP-MS). Transformed size distributions are then compared between the methods and conclusions drawn on methods’ measurement accuracy, limits of detection and quantification related to the synthetic amorphous silca's size. Two out of the six tested methods (GEMMA and AF4-ICP-MS) cross validate the MED distributions between each other, providing a true measurement. The measurement accuracy of other four techniques is shown to be compromised either by the high limit of detection and quantification (CLS, NTA, Wet-SEM) or the sample preparation that is biased by increased retention of smaller nanomaterials (SEM). This study thereby presents a successful and conclusive cross-method comparison of size distribution measurements of aggregated nanomaterials. The authors recommend the uniform MED size expression for application in nanomaterial risk assessment studies and clarifications in current regulations and definitions concerning nanomaterials.

Graphical abstract: A uniform measurement expression for cross method comparison of nanoparticle aggregate size distributions

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Publication details

The article was received on 21 Mar 2015, accepted on 09 Jun 2015 and first published on 09 Jun 2015


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C5AN00561B
Author version available: Download Author version (PDF)
Citation: Analyst, 2015,140, 5257-5267
  •   Request permissions

    A uniform measurement expression for cross method comparison of nanoparticle aggregate size distributions

    A. Dudkiewicz, S. Wagner, A. Lehner, Q. Chaudhry, S. Pietravalle, K. Tiede, A. B. A. Boxall, G. Allmaier, D. Tiede, R. Grombe, F. von der Kammer, T. Hofmann and K. Mølhave, Analyst, 2015, 140, 5257
    DOI: 10.1039/C5AN00561B

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements