Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 6, 2014
Previous Article Next Article

Statistical evaluation of toxicological bioassays – a review

Author affiliations

Abstract

The basic conclusions in almost all reports on new drug applications and in all publications in toxicology are based on statistical methods. However, serious contradictions exist in practice: designs with small samples sizes but use of asymptotic methods (i.e. constructed for larger sample sizes), statistically significant findings without biological relevance (and vice versa), proof of hazard vs. proof of safety, testing (e.g. no observed effect level) vs. estimation (e.g. benchmark dose), available statistical theory vs. related user-friendly software. In this review the biostatistical developments since about the year 2000 onwards are discussed, mainly structured for repeated-dose studies, mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive and ecotoxicological assays. A critical discussion is included on the unnecessarily conservative evaluation proposed in guidelines, the inadequate but almost always used proof of hazard approach, and the limitation of data-dependent decision-tree approaches.

Graphical abstract: Statistical evaluation of toxicological bioassays – a review

Back to tab navigation
Please wait while Download options loads

Publication details

The article was received on 16 May 2014, accepted on 22 Jul 2014 and first published on 08 Aug 2014


Article type: Review Article
DOI: 10.1039/C4TX00047A
Citation: Toxicol. Res., 2014,3, 418-432
  • Open access: Creative Commons BY-NC license
  •   Request permissions

    Statistical evaluation of toxicological bioassays – a review

    L. A. Hothorn, Toxicol. Res., 2014, 3, 418
    DOI: 10.1039/C4TX00047A

Search articles by author