Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 23, 2013
Previous Article Next Article

Hydrogen bonding versus hyperconjugation in condensed-phase carbocations

Author affiliations

Abstract

Hyperconjugative stabilization of positive charge in tertiary carbocations is the textbook explanation for their stability and low frequency νCH bands in their IR spectra have long been taken as confirming evidence. While this is substantiated in the gas phase by the very close match of the IR spectrum of argon-tagged t-butyl cation with that calculated under Cs symmetry, the situation in condensed phases is much less clear. The congruence of νCHmax of t-Bu+ in superacid media (2830 cm−1) with that in the gas phase (2834 cm−1) has recently been shown to be accidental. Rather, νCHmax varies considerably as a function of counterion in a manner that reveals the presence of significant C–H⋯anion hydrogen bonding. This paper addresses the question of the relative importance of hyperconjugation versus H-bonding. We show by assigning IR spectra in the νCH region to specific C–H bonds in t-butyl cation that the low frequency νCHmax band in the IR spectrum of t-butyl cation, long taken as direct evidence for hyperconjugation, appears to be due mostly to H-bonding. The appearance of similar low frequency νCH bands in the IR spectra of secondary alkyl carboranes such as i-Pr(CHB11Cl11), which have predominant sp3 centres rather than sp2 centres (and are therefore less supportive of hyperconjugation), also suggests the dominance of H-bonding over hyperconjugation.

Graphical abstract: Hydrogen bonding versus hyperconjugation in condensed-phase carbocations

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Publication details

The article was received on 12 Apr 2013, accepted on 23 Apr 2013 and first published on 01 May 2013


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C3OB40737C
Citation: Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013,11, 3797-3802
  •   Request permissions

    Hydrogen bonding versus hyperconjugation in condensed-phase carbocations

    C. A. Reed, E. S. Stoyanov and F. S. Tham, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 3797
    DOI: 10.1039/C3OB40737C

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements