Issue 4, 2013

Response to “A critique of Abraham and Acree's correlation for deca-1,9-diene–water partition coefficients”

Abstract

The manuscript responds to the critique of Nitsche and Kasting concerning our published correlation for deca-1,9-diene–water partition coefficients. Several statements made in the critique are refuted, and shown to be misrepresentations of ideas contained in our earlier paper.

Graphical abstract: Response to “A critique of Abraham and Acree's correlation for deca-1,9-diene–water partition coefficients”

Article information

Article type
Letter
Submitted
07 Dec 2012
Accepted
01 Feb 2013
First published
04 Feb 2013

New J. Chem., 2013,37, 882-885

Response to “A critique of Abraham and Acree's correlation for deca-1,9-diene–water partition coefficients”

M. H. Abraham and W. E. Acree, Jr., New J. Chem., 2013, 37, 882 DOI: 10.1039/C3NJ41111G

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements