Jump to main content
Jump to site search
PLANNED MAINTENANCE Close the message box

Scheduled maintenance upgrade on Thursday 4th of May 2017 from 8.00am to 9.00am (BST).

During this time our websites will be offline temporarily. If you have any questions please use the feedback button on this page. We apologise for any inconvenience this might cause and thank you for your patience.


Issue 40, 2013
Previous Article Next Article

Comparison of ancillary ligand effects between 2,2′-bipyridine and 2-(2′-pyridyl)phenyl in the linkage and bridging isomerism of 5-methyltetrazolato iridium(III) and/or rhodium(III) complexes

Author affiliations

Abstract

Several new iridium(III) and rhodium(III) complexes bearing 5-methyltetrazolate (MeCN4) have been prepared, and their structures in the crystals and in solution have been determined by X-ray analysis and by NMR spectroscopy, respectively. In the crystals of the mononuclear complexes, κN2-coordination of MeCN4 was observed when the ancillary ligand was 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy): [Cp*M(bpy)(MeCN4N2)]PF6 (Cp* = η5-C5Me5; M = Ir: 1 and Rh: 2), while the corresponding complexes with 2-(2′-pyridyl)phenyl (ppy) were confirmed to have the κN1-coordination of MeCN4: [Cp*M(ppy)(MeCN4N1)] (M = Ir: 3 and Rh: 4). In solution, the IrIII complexes (1 and 3) were robust enough to maintain their molecular structures, but the RhIII complexes (2 and 4) existed as an equilibrium mixture of the κN1- and κN2-isomers. In addition to the IrIII–IrIII and RhIII–RhIII homodinuclear complexes bridged by MeCN4 (5–8), the corresponding heterodinuclear IrIII–RhIII complexes (9–12) were prepared using the mononuclear IrIII complexes (1 and 3) as precursors. The molecular structures of these dinuclear complexes were also characterised. Interestingly, both of the heterodinuclear complexes comprised of Cp*M(bpy)2+ and Cp*M′(ppy)+ fragments, [Cp*M(bpy)(μ-MeCN4)M′(ppy)Cp*](PF6)2 (M = Ir, M′ = Rh: 10 and M = Rh, M′ = Ir: 11), exhibited selective crystallisation of a specific μ-κN1(M′-ppy):κN3(M-bpy) isomer. In solution, the dinuclear complexes with a Rh–N(MeCN4) bond and more than one positive charge (6 and 9–11) showed a dissociation equilibrium, while monocationic MeCN4-bridged complexes (7, 8 and 12) were inactive for dissociation. Furthermore, the heterodinuclear complexes of 9–12, as well as the RhIII–RhIII complex of 8, exhibited a bridging isomerisation, which would proceed via a η22-intermediate without dissociation of Cp*M(bpy or ppy) fragments.

Graphical abstract: Comparison of ancillary ligand effects between 2,2′-bipyridine and 2-(2′-pyridyl)phenyl in the linkage and bridging isomerism of 5-methyltetrazolato iridium(iii) and/or rhodium(iii) complexes

Back to tab navigation
Please wait while Download options loads

Supplementary files

Publication details

The article was received on 22 Jun 2013, accepted on 26 Jul 2013 and first published on 01 Aug 2013


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C3DT51667A
Citation: Dalton Trans., 2013,42, 14556-14567
  •   Request permissions

    Comparison of ancillary ligand effects between 2,2′-bipyridine and 2-(2′-pyridyl)phenyl in the linkage and bridging isomerism of 5-methyltetrazolato iridium(III) and/or rhodium(III) complexes

    A. Takayama, T. Suzuki, M. Ikeda, Y. Sunatsuki and M. Kojima, Dalton Trans., 2013, 42, 14556
    DOI: 10.1039/C3DT51667A

Search articles by author