Jump to main content
Jump to site search
PLANNED MAINTENANCE Close the message box

Scheduled maintenance upgrade on Thursday 4th of May 2017 from 8.00am to 9.00am (BST).

During this time our websites will be offline temporarily. If you have any questions please use the feedback button on this page. We apologise for any inconvenience this might cause and thank you for your patience.

Issue 3, 2012
Previous Article Next Article

Cooperative learning instruction for conceptual change in the concepts of chemical kinetics

Author affiliations


Learning is a social event and so the students need learning environments that enable them to work with their peers so that they can learn through their interactions. This study discusses the effectiveness of cooperative learning compared to traditional instruction in terms of students' motivation and understanding of chemical kinetics in a high school chemistry course. Participants were 110 eleventh grade students from two different schools. The researchers administered the Reaction Rate Concept Test to measure the students' understanding of chemical kinetics, the Science Process Skill Test to decide whether the groups were different in terms of their science process skills before instruction, and the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire to assess students' motivation for a chemistry course. Results of the experiment showed that compared to traditional instruction, cooperative learning enabled better understanding of the concepts of chemical kinetics and improved students' motivation to study chemistry for both schools.

Back to tab navigation
Please wait while Download options loads

Publication details

The article was received on 30 Sep 2011, accepted on 28 Feb 2012 and first published on 02 Apr 2012

Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C1RP90072B
Citation: Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2012,13, 221-236
  •   Request permissions

    Cooperative learning instruction for conceptual change in the concepts of chemical kinetics

    Ö. Taştan Kırık and Y. Boz, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2012, 13, 221
    DOI: 10.1039/C1RP90072B

Search articles by author