Jump to main content
Jump to site search
PLANNED MAINTENANCE Close the message box

Scheduled maintenance upgrade on Thursday 4th of May 2017 from 8.00am to 9.00am (BST).

During this time our websites will be offline temporarily. If you have any questions please use the feedback button on this page. We apologise for any inconvenience this might cause and thank you for your patience.


Issue 19, 2012
Previous Article Next Article

Reflections on the chemistry of the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis

Author affiliations

Abstract

Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) occupies a key position in the search for alternatives to petroleum for obtaining liquid hydrocarbons. Hydrocarbons can be produced from alternative carbonaceous resources (natural gas, coal, biomass and waste) through FTS and the use of biomass is particularly attractive from a carbon footprint point of view. However, the nature of biomass resources dictates a different exploration approach compared to fossil fuel resources. Compared to coal and natural gas based FTS processes where economics of scale is an advantage, a Biomass-to-Liquid (BTL) plant is more suited for smaller scale operation. Thus, the BTL process economy will benefit from a condensed FTS processes. Moreover, considering the expected role of FTS in regional and global hydrocarbon supply in the near future, it becomes pertinent to strive towards improving the process economy. This requires molecular and process engineering and detailed knowledge of the reaction is a pre-requisite to engineering the reaction at molecular level. Syngas to hydrocarbon involves consecutive steps of CO activation, C–C coupling, hydrogenation and desorption of the hydrocarbon product. Atomic details of the dynamics of these steps are still unclear. Recently, clearer pictures about activation are now available. However, over the course of ninety years since the first report on an FTS, proposed pathway of C–C coupling has come full cycle from oxygenate to nonoxygenate and back to oxygenate intermediates. To this end, we attempted an X-ray of progress made at providing answers to issues in the chemistry of FTS. The review focuses on product distribution, macro kinetics and the mechanism of FTS. We compare FTS with other C–C coupling reactions of CO, identify catalytic entities for controlling product selectivity and finally we offer an outlook on future directions of fundamental research towards resolving the lingering questions on the mechanism of C–C coupling in FTS.

Graphical abstract: Reflections on the chemistry of the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis

Back to tab navigation
Please wait while Download options loads

Publication details

The article was received on 21 Mar 2012, accepted on 24 Apr 2012 and first published on 25 Apr 2012


Article type: Review Article
DOI: 10.1039/C2RA20519J
Citation: RSC Adv., 2012,2, 7347-7366
  •   Request permissions

    Reflections on the chemistry of the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis

    O. O. James, B. Chowdhury, M. A. Mesubi and S. Maity, RSC Adv., 2012, 2, 7347
    DOI: 10.1039/C2RA20519J

Search articles by author