This website uses cookies to give you the best user experience. If you continue
without changing your settings we'll assume you are happy to receive all RSC cookies.
You can change your cookie settings by navigating to our Privacy and Cookies page and following the instructions. These instructions
are also obtainable from the privacy link at the bottom of any RSC page.
Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
E-mail: stephen.bradforth@usc.edu
; Fax: (+213) 740-3972
; Tel: (+213) 740-0461
b
School of Chemistry, Cantocks Close, University of Bristol, UK
Faraday Discuss., 2012,157, 141-163
DOI:
10.1039/C2FD20043K
Received
03 Mar 2012,
Accepted
23 Mar 2012
First published online
23 Mar 2012
To explore how the solvent influences primary aspects of bond breaking, the gas and solution phase photochemistries of phenol and of para-methylthiophenol are directly compared using, respectively, H (Rydberg) atom photofragment translation spectroscopy and femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. Approaches are demonstrated that allow explicit comparisons of the nascent product energy disposals and dissociation mechanisms in the two phases. It is found, at least for the case of the weakly perturbing cyclohexane environment, that most aspects of the primary reaction dynamics of the isolated molecule are reproduced in solution. Specifically, in the gas phase, both molecules can undergo fast X–H (XO, S) bond dissociation upon excitation with short wavelengths (193 < λpump < 216 nm), following population of the dissociative S2 (11πσ*) state. Product electronic branching, vibrational and translational energy disposals are determined. Photolysis of phenol and para-methylthiophenol in solution at 200 nm results in formation of vibrationally excited radicals on a timescale shorter than 200 fs. Excitation of para-methylthiophenol at 267 nm reaches close to the S1 (11ππ*)/S2 (11πσ*) conical intersection (CI): ultrafast dissociation is observed in both the isolated and solution systems—again indicating direct dissociation on the S2 potential energy surface. Comparing results for this precursor at different excitation energies, the extent of geminate recombination and the derived H-atom ejection lengths in the condensed phase photolyses are in qualitative agreement with the translational energy release measured in the gas phase studies. Conversely, excitation of phenol at 267 nm prepares the system in its S1 state at an energy well below its S1/S2 CI; the slow O–H bond fission inferred in the gas phase experiments is observed directly in the time-resolved studies in cyclohexane solution via the appearance of phenoxyl radical absorption after 1 ns, with only S1 excited state absorption discernible at earlier delay times. The slow O–H bond fission in solution provides additional evidence for a tunnelling dissociation mechanism, where the H atom tunnels beneath the lower diabats of the S2/S1 CI. Finally, the photodissociation of phenol clusters in solution is considered, where evidence is presented that the O–H dissociation coordinate is impeded in H-bonded dimers.
Fetching data from CrossRef. This may take some time to load.