Issue 1, 2013

Interplay of bite angle and cone angle effects. A comparison between o-C6H4(CH2PR2)(PR′2) and o-C6H4(CH2PR2)(CH2PR′2) as ligands for Pd-catalysed ethene hydromethoxycarbonylation

Abstract

The following unsymmetrical diphosphines have been prepared: o-C6H4(CH2PtBu2)(PR2) where R = PtBu2 (L3a3a3a); PCg (L3b3b); PPh2 (L3c3c3c); P(o-C6H4CH3)2 (L3d3d3d); P(o-C6H4OCH3)2 (L3e3e) and o-C6H4(CH2PCg)(PCg) (L3f3f) where PCg is 6-phospha-2,4,8-trioxa-1,3,5,7-tetramethyladamant-6-yl. Hydromethoxycarbonylation of ethene under commercially relevant conditions has been investigated in the presence of Pd complexes of each of the ligands L3a–f3a–f and the results compared with those obtained with the commercially used o-C6H4(CH2PtBu2)2 (L1a1a). The Pd complexes of the bulkiest ligands L3a3a3a, L3b3b and L3f3f are highly active catalysts but the Pd complexes of L3c3c3c, L3d3d3d and L3e3e are completely inactive. The crystal structures of the complexes [PtCl2(L1a1a)] (1a) and [PtCl2(L3a3a3a)] (2a) have been determined and show that the crystallographic bite angles and cone angles are greater for L1a1a than L3a3a3a. Solution NMR studies show that the seven-membered chelate in 1a is more rigid than the six-membered chelate in 2a. Treatment of [PtCl(CH3)(cod)] with L3a–f3a–f gave [PtCl(CH3)(L3a–f3a–f)] as mixtures of 2 isomers 3a–f and 4a–f. The ratio of the products 4 : 3 ranges from 100 : 1 to 1 : 20, the precise proportion is apparently governed by a balance of two competing factors, steric bulk and the antisymbiotic effect. The palladium complexes [PdCl(CH3)(L3b3b)] (5b/6b) and [PdCl(CH3)(L3c3c3c)] (5c/6c) react with labelled 13CO to give the corresponding acyl species [PdCl(13COCH3)(L3b3b)] (7b/8b) and [PdCl(13COCH3)(L3c3c3c)] (7c/8c). Treatment of [PdCl(13COCH3)(L)] with MeOH gave CH313COOMe rapidly when L = L3b3b but very slowly when L = L3c3c3c paralleling the contrasting catalytic activity of the Pd complexes of these two ligands.

Graphical abstract: Interplay of bite angle and cone angle effects. A comparison between o-C6H4(CH2PR2)(PR′2) and o-C6H4(CH2PR2)(CH2PR′2) as ligands for Pd-catalysed ethene hydromethoxycarbonylation

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
21 Aug 2012
Accepted
03 Oct 2012
First published
19 Oct 2012

Dalton Trans., 2013,42, 100-115

Interplay of bite angle and cone angle effects. A comparison between o-C6H4(CH2PR2)(PR′2) and o-C6H4(CH2PR2)(CH2PR′2) as ligands for Pd-catalysed ethene hydromethoxycarbonylation

T. Fanjul, G. Eastham, J. Floure, S. J. K. Forrest, M. F. Haddow, A. Hamilton, P. G. Pringle, A. G. Orpen and M. Waugh, Dalton Trans., 2013, 42, 100 DOI: 10.1039/C2DT31913F

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements