Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 6, 2011
Previous Article Next Article

A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies

Author affiliations

Abstract

Nanotechnology is being used to enhance conventional ceramic and polymeric water treatment membrane materials through various avenues. Among the numerous concepts proposed, the most promising to date include zeolitic and catalytic nanoparticle coated ceramic membranes, hybrid inorganic–organic nanocomposite membranes, and bio-inspired membranes such as hybrid proteinpolymer biomimetic membranes, aligned nanotube membranes, and isoporous block copolymer membranes. A semi-quantitative ranking system was proposed considering projected performance enhancement (over state-of-the-art analogs) and state of commercial readiness. Performance enhancement was based on water permeability, solute selectivity, and operational robustness, while commercial readiness was based on known or anticipated material costs, scalability (for large scale water treatment applications), and compatibility with existing manufacturing infrastructure. Overall, bio-inspired membranes are farthest from commercial reality, but offer the most promise for performance enhancements; however, nanocomposite membranes offering significant performance enhancements are already commercially available. Zeolitic and catalytic membranes appear reasonably far from commercial reality and offer small to moderate performance enhancements. The ranking of each membrane nanotechnology is discussed along with the key commercialization hurdles for each membrane nanotechnology.

Graphical abstract: A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies

Back to tab navigation

Publication details

The article was received on 08 Oct 2010, accepted on 08 Mar 2011 and first published on 18 Apr 2011


Article type: Review Article
DOI: 10.1039/C0EE00541J
Citation: Energy Environ. Sci., 2011,4, 1946-1971
  •   Request permissions

    A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies

    M. M. Pendergast and E. M.V. Hoek, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4, 1946
    DOI: 10.1039/C0EE00541J

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements