This website uses cookies to give you the best user experience. If you continue
without changing your settings we'll assume you are happy to receive all RSC cookies.
You can change your cookie settings by navigating to our Privacy and Cookies page and following the instructions. These instructions
are also obtainable from the privacy link at the bottom of any RSC page.
A journal linking all aspects of the chemical, physical and biotechnological sciences relating to energy conversion and storage, alternative fuel technologies and environmental science.
Low-Carbon Mobility Centre, Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, Hayes House, 75 George Street, Oxford, UK
E-mail: xiaoyu.yan@smithschool.ox.ac.uk
; Tel: +44 (0)1865614923
Energy Environ. Sci., 2010,3, 190-197
DOI:
10.1039/B915801D
Received
03 Aug 2009,
Accepted
14 Oct 2009
First published online
12 Nov 2009
This article is part of themed collection:
Biofuels
Alternative transportation fuels are projected to grow substantially due to energy security concerns especially in the US and China. Moreover, some of these fuels can potentially reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the transportation sector and hence, can help to mitigate climate change. We present a comprehensive review on Well-to-Wheel fossil fuel use and GHG emissions of biofuels and synthetic fuels in the US and China including emissions from land-use change. Our results are carefully benchmarked to the emissions caused by crude oil-derived fuels as well as synthetic fuels from fossil feedstocks in order to estimate the potential emission reduction or increase. The review strongly suggests that biofuels and synthetic fuels can contribute to GHG mitigation in the transport sector only if appropriate feedstocks are used and emissions from land-use change are minimised.
Fetching data from CrossRef. This may take some time to load.
Energy & Environmental Science
- Information Point