Issue 11, 2005

Comparison of field-observed and model-predicted plume trends at fuel-contaminated sites: Implications for natural attenuation rates

Abstract

Subsequent to modeling of natural attenuation processes to predict contaminant trends and plume dynamics, monitoring data were used to evaluate the effectiveness of natural attenuation at reducing contaminant concentrations in groundwater at seven fuel-contaminated sites. Predicted and observed contaminant trends at seven sites were compared in order to empirically assess the accuracy of some fundamental model input parameters and assumptions. Most of the models developed for the study sites tended to overestimate plume migration distance, source persistence, and/or the time required for the benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylenes (BTEX) plumes to attenuate. Discrepancies between observed and predicted contaminant trends and plume behavior suggested that the influence of natural attenuation process may not have been accurately simulated. The conservatism of model simulations may be attributed to underestimation of natural source weathering rates, overestimation of the mass of contaminant present in the source area, and/or use of overly conservative first-order solute decay rates.

Graphical abstract: Comparison of field-observed and model-predicted plume trends at fuel-contaminated sites: Implications for natural attenuation rates

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
20 Apr 2005
Accepted
05 Aug 2005
First published
17 Aug 2005

J. Environ. Monit., 2005,7, 1099-1104

Comparison of field-observed and model-predicted plume trends at fuel-contaminated sites: Implications for natural attenuation rates

S. Jeong, D. H. Kampbell, Y. An and B. M. Henry, J. Environ. Monit., 2005, 7, 1099 DOI: 10.1039/B505539C

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements