Issue 9, 2001

Abstract

The methods used by laboratories participating in FAPAS® proficiency testing covering trace metals have been reviewed. Techniques that tend to give the highest percentage of satisfactory z-scores are identified. Comparisons are made of digestion and extraction techniques, use of atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AA: graphite furnace and flame) and inductively coupled plasma techniques (ICP-OES and ICP-MS). It does not follow that one technique is more accurate than the others, because some individual laboratories consistently achieve satisfactory results using any of the five main digestion techniques and any of the major detection techniques. The results do, however, give an indication of which techniques are easier to perform correctly and with a high standard of accuracy. There are also other factors that may influence results such as instrument set-up, background correction and data analysis.

Article information

Article type
Technical Note
Submitted
28 Mar 2001
Accepted
03 Jul 2001
First published
17 Aug 2001

J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2001,16, 1101-1106

A review of analytical methods for lead, cadmium, mercury, arsenic and tin determination used in proficiency testing

M. Rose, M. Knaggs, L. Owen and M. Baxter, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2001, 16, 1101 DOI: 10.1039/B102839C

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements