Issue 23, 1987

A comparison of the MNDO and AM1 SCF-MO energy surfaces for dipolar cycloaddition and [3,3] sigmatropic reactions

Abstract

Difference contour energy maps for several π4s+π2s dipolar cycloadditions and for the [3,3] sigmatropic (Claisen) rearrangement of pent-4-enal indicate that the AM1 and MNDO SCF-MO methods differ most significantly at C–C, C–O, and C–N bond distances of approximately 2.3, 2.05, and 2.5 Å, respectively; the AM1 results for bond formation involving nitrogen appear to be incorrect owing to excessive core–core repulsion.

Article information

Article type
Paper

J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1987, 1779-1781

A comparison of the MNDO and AM1 SCF-MO energy surfaces for dipolar cycloaddition and [3,3] sigmatropic reactions

L. Grierson, M. J. Perkins and H. S. Rzepa, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1987, 1779 DOI: 10.1039/C39870001779

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements