Nishant
Singh
a,
Maria P.
Conte
b,
R. V.
Ulijn
*bc,
Juan F.
Miravet
*a and
Beatriu
Escuder
*a
aDepartament de Química Inorgànica i Orgànica, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castelló, Spain. E-mail: miravet@uji.es; escuder@uji.es; Fax: +34 964728214; Tel: +34 964729155
bWestCHEM/Department of Pure & Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, 295 Cathedral Street, Glasgow, G1 1XL, UK
cAdvanced Science Research Center (ASRC) and Hunter College, City University of New York, 85 St Nicholas Terrace, New York NY10027, USA
First published on 10th July 2015
A low molecular weight hydrogelator with a covalently appended imidazole moiety is reported. Capable of percolating water in the pH range of 6 to 8, it proves to be an efficient catalyst upon self-assembly, showing Michaelis–Menten type kinetics. Activities at different pH values correlated with dramatic structural changes were observed. It can hydrolyse p-nitrophenyl acetate (pNPA) as well as inactivated esters, and L and D-phenylalanine methyl esters. The enhanced activity can be related to the conglomeration of catalytic groups upon aggregation resulting in their close proximity and the formation of hydrophobic pockets.
Compound 1 with a minimum gel concentration of 5.7 mM was tested for the esterase like activity using pNPA as the substrate. pNPA upon hydrolysis yields chromogenic p-nitrophenolate anion which can be monitored at 400 nm using UV spectroscopy (see ESI† for details). The initial parts of the kinetic curves for hydrolysis at different concentrations of substrate were fitted to the Michaelis–Menten equation for respective pH values. The obtained KM, kcat and Vmax values are presented in Table 1.
pH 6 | pH 6.5 | pH 7 | pH 7.5 | pH 8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
k cat (s−1) ×102 | 2.6 ± 0.4 | 2.5 ± 0.6 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 2.4 ± 0.7 | 2.5 ± 0.6 |
K M (mM) | 3.3 ± 1.1 | 3.1 ± 1.6 | 4.0 ± 1.5 | 3.9 ± 1.6 | 3.7 ± 1.3 |
V max (μmol s−1) | 8.8 | 8.6 | 7.3 | 8.1 | 8.3 |
The calculated pKa values for the aggregated compound 1 are 5.9 and 6.6, with the monoprotonated species abundant in this range (see Fig. S1, ESI†). This drop in the pKa value to 5.9 is only observed for the aggregated form of 1, as in solution the pKa values are similar (6.2 and 6.3). This indicates the increase in basicity of one of the two imidazole moieties in molecule 1 only in the self-assembled state.
The catalytic efficiency (kcat/KM) for imidazole molecules in solution is known to drop significantly at lower pH values.2a,3,4 The higher amounts of protonated imidazole moieties are held responsible for this which normally are not catalytically active. To our surprise, for the pH 6 and 6.5 we did not observe this drop; in fact there was a slight rise in the catalytic efficiency when compared to higher pH values like 7 and 7.5. This unusual catalytic efficiency around the pKa values of self-assembled 1 suggests the involvement of both protonated and deprotonated imidazoles in the catalysis, often referred to as a cooperative mechanism in the literature (Fig. S2c and d, ESI†).2a,3,4
Well above the pKa only the deprotonated imidazole residues are present and held responsible for the hydrolysis. The catalytic efficiency at pH 8 only due to the deprotonated imidazole groups is 7.37 M−1 s−1. We know from the potentiometric titration curve that the mono-protonated imidazole is present in four-fold excess compared to the deprotonated imidazole at pH 6.5 (Fig. S1, ESI†). According to these values, the extrapolated catalytic efficiency of the deprotonated imidazole at pH 6.5, assuming that the protonated imidazole is not active should be 1.65 M−1 s−1 whereas that observed is 8.09 M−1 s−1. Hence, based on these observations the catalytic efficiency at lower pH values 6 and 6.5 cannot be simply attributed to the contribution of the fraction of deprotonated imidazole. Instead, the cooperativity between both protonated and deprotonated imidazole groups is likely responsible.
The solubility (Ksol) of compound 1 obtained by NMR experiments for pH 6, pH 7 and pH 8 were 2.85 mM, 1.95 mM and 0.95 mM respectively (Fig. S4, ESI†). The Ksec (second order rate constant) values observed at these pH respective non-aggregating concentrations of compound 1, were significantly lower than at the self-assembling concentration (Fig. S3, ESI†), thus highlighting the fact that observed catalysis is not by the molecules in solution but due to the catalytically active fibers. This was further confirmed by the catalytic activity observed for the non-assembling analogue 2. The Ksec for 2 at pH 6.5, pH 7 and pH 8 are 0.5 M−1 s−1, 0.7 M−1 s−1 and 2.2 M−1 s−1 which are significantly lower than for 1 under identical conditions. The obtained linear relationship between velocity of product formation and substrate concentration reflected the lack of any binding events unlike 1 (Fig. 1a and Fig. S2b, ESI†).
Owing to the fast hydrolysis trend shown by 1 we anticipated it to be capable of hydrolysing even stronger non-activated ester linkages such as methyl esters. We chose L and D-phenylalanine methyl esters as our substrate and followed its hydrolysis by HPLC (see ESI† for details). As expected, these substrates did not undergo any noticeable background hydrolysis at pH 7 whereas, with 33 mol% of 1 as the catalyst, we could observe a commendable hydrolysis rate of the methyl esters (Fig. 4a and Fig. S8, ESI†). The calculated catalytic efficiency for the hydrolysis of L and D-phenylalanine methyl esters by 1 are 1.2 × 10−3 M−1 h−1 and 1.7 × 10−3 M−1 h−1 respectively. The Ksec (2.5 × 10−4 M−1 h−1) for 2 is an order of magnitude smaller than for 1 exemplifying the aggregation effect, even though there does not seem to be any stereoselectivity shown by 1 (Fig. 4b). Thus, the hydrolysis of a non-activated ester at the physiological pH, which to our knowledge has not been demonstrated before, reflects the fact that aggregation can lead to newly emergent catalytic abilities even in small molecules owing to the high local concentration of the catalytic sites.
A series of experiments were performed to obtain the structure–activity relationship. The nanoscale structures of the self-assembled networks of gels as observed by TEM differ depending on pH values (Fig. 2). TEM images reveal helical fibres of 15–20 nm width at pH 6 and 6.5. The higher Vmax values for pNPA hydrolysis obtained at these pH values can be attributed to the observed high aspect ratio fibres, allowing a higher extent of substrate binding thus releasing more products. At pH 7 and 8 the molecules aggregate in flat belt-like structures, which are 0.5 μm wide and several micrometers long, with a lower aspect ratio. The variation in morphologies based on pH can be attributed to the change in the number of protonated imidazole residues. The repulsion between a higher number of protonated imidazole present at pH 6 and 6.5 may result in stacking of molecules with a higher slip angle between them; this gives rise to the twists observed in the nanofibers. This is not seen farther away from the pKa by increasing the pH due to the significantly lower number of protonated imidazole residues.
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 TEM images of gels at (a) pH 6 (scale bar: 50 nm) (b) pH 6.5 (scale bar: 100 nm) (inset: zoomed image of twisted fibre) (c) pH 7 (scale bar: 0.5 μm) (d) pH 8 (scale bar: 0.5 μm). |
The amide I′ band in the 1630–1638 cm−1 region of IR for different pH values denote the presence of β-sheet like structures, which is also evident from the circular dichroism (CD) contours (Fig. 3(a) and Fig. S9, ESI†). While moving from pH 8 to pH 6 an increase in ellipticity together with an apparent red-shift is observed in the CD spectra.5a,b,d
![]() | ||
Fig. 3 (a) CD spectra obtained for gels at different pH values and (b) fluorescence emission of ANS in gels and background at different pH values. |
These kinds of spectral shifts to longer wavelengths are reported for twisted fibers having π–π* transitions with larger dipole moments which is expected in the case of protonated imidazoles more than the deprotonated ones.5c This information obtained from CD and IR are in agreement with the TEM images of the catalytic gels, which switch from twisted helical fibers (pH 6 and 6.5) to flat belt like structures (pH 7 and 8).
In order to evaluate the presence of hydrophobic binding pockets, we probed the gels at different pH values with 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulphonate (ANS), used extensively for this purpose in protein structure studies.6 When ANS was introduced into hydrogel 1, an apparent blue shift along with the increase in the fluorescence was observed, confirming the presence of hydrophobic pockets (Fig. 3(b)). These hydrophobic binding pockets could be formed by the central alkyl chain as well as by the L-valine isopropyl residues in 1. The molecular rigidity introduced by the two amide groups could be balanced by the flexibility of the alkyl spacer as well as the rotational freedom of the imidazole end fragments. Overall, a dynamic binding pocket could be confirmed in the vicinity of the catalytic fragment. It is also remarkable that the effect of the L-valine residue as compound 2 lacking this amino acid fragment does not even aggregate under similar conditions. Moreover, the fluorescence intensity at pH 6 and 6.5 is higher and more blue shifted (472 nm for pH 6 and 474 nm for pH 6.5) than for the rest of the pH values, suggesting stronger binding of the ANS and supporting the lower KM values obtained for the pNPA hydrolysis at these pH values. In summary, the kcat observed for pNPA hydrolysis shows little variation with pH, with the change in catalytic efficiency probably due to differences in substrate binding. Although the errors in KM are significant, a clear trend is observed. This behaviour can be attributed to the difference in availability of binding pockets for each morphology. It is remarkable that a simple low molecular weight self-assembling compound bearing a minimal peptidic fragment is able to catalyse the hydrolysis of an activated ester as efficiently or even better than the few previously reported examples of longer self-assembled peptides.3 For instance, Stupp et al.3a reported a rate constant of 1.67 × 10−2 s−1 and a KM of 0.4 mM for a bis-histidine containing decapeptide and a less efficient tetradecapeptide containing one histidine residue was described by Liang et al.3c (kcat 0.19 × 10−2 s−1 and KM 21.68 mM). The same group reported a shorter analogue (Fmoc–FFH–CONH2) with lower reaction rate than in the case of compound 1 (kcat 0.14 × 10−2 s−1) but with a stronger binding ability (KM 0.76 mM).3b Related results have been also reported by Korendovych et al. for amyloidogenic heptapeptides bearing H residues that after self-assembly are able to coordinate Zn+2 and efficiently catalyse the hydrolysis of pNPA.3d This example, however, follows a different catalytic mechanism based on a metal ion Lewis acid catalysis. All these examples highlight the existence of an undoubtable link between self-assembly and emergence of catalysis which is also exemplified by compound 1.
In summary, we have reported an example of a catalytic supramolecular hydrogel in which binding and catalysis take place in reaction sites self-constructed solely by non-covalent interactions. We have been able to identify the probable structure–activity relationship between the different self-assembled structures and the subsequent catalytic performances of the gels. The results indicated that the presence of hydrophobic pockets, higher aspect ratio of fibres and the balance between the protonated and deprotonated imidazole could be the key factors for improved hydrolysis efficiency compared to related non-aggregating catalysts. It is remarkable that enzyme-like catalytic behaviour emerges after self-assembly of small and simple molecular components. It is worth mentioning that very simple low-molecular weight compounds can approach, although modestly by now, what evolution has achieved after millions of years. In fact, it has been proposed that short self-assembled peptides could have played a relevant role in the early stages of the origin of life.7 In this context, self-assembled catalytic peptides could have been potential precursors of enzymes.
This work was supported by the EU Marie Curie ITN-Smartnet and the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain (Grant CTQ2012-37735). N.S. and M.P.C. thank EU for an ESR Marie Curie contract.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental details on synthesis and characterisation of compounds and catalytic experiments. See DOI: 10.1039/c5cc04281j |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |