Issue 38, 2011

Patterning small-molecule biocapture surfaces: microcontact insertion printing vs.photolithography

Abstract

Chemical patterns prepared by self-assembly, combined with soft lithography or photolithography, are directly compared. Pattern fidelity can be controlled in both cases but patterning at the low densities necessary for small-molecule probe capture of large biomolecule targets is better accomplished using microcontact insertion printing (μCIP). Surfaces patterned by μCIP are used to capture biomolecule binding partners for the small molecules dopamine and biotin.

Graphical abstract: Patterning small-molecule biocapture surfaces: microcontact insertion printing vs.photolithography

Supplementary files

Additions and corrections

Article information

Article type
Communication
Submitted
23 May 2011
Accepted
27 Jul 2011
First published
26 Aug 2011

Chem. Commun., 2011,47, 10641-10643

Patterning small-molecule biocapture surfaces: microcontact insertion printing vs.photolithography

M. J. Shuster, A. Vaish, H. H. Cao, A. I. Guttentag, J. E. McManigle, A. L. Gibb, M. M. Martinez, R. M. Nezarati, J. M. Hinds, W.-S. Liao, P. S. Weiss and A. M. Andrews, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 10641 DOI: 10.1039/C1CC13002A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements