Interview: Genetic alphabets
10 August 2009
Ichiro Hirao talks about nucleic acid research, expanding the genetic code and the possibility of creating new life. Kathleen Too asks the questions
| Ichiro Hirao is a team leader at the RIKEN System and Structural Biology Center, Yokohama, Japan. He is interested in the creation of unnatural base pairs towards the expansion of the genetic code and re-engineering DNA/RNA materials. |
What inspired you to become a scientist?
From a very young age, I have been fascinated by science. When I was in elementary school I devised my own experiments. At the age of 11, I attempted the electrolysis of water to make hydrogen and oxygen gas on my own.
What motivated you to study the chemistry of nucleic acids?
You are currently working on unnatural base pairs for the expansion of the genetic alphabet. Can you explain why this is important?
If we create new base pairs besides the A-T and G-C pairs, we can add new compounds into nucleic acids and proteins. All creatures have only 4 bases: A, T, C and G. I often ask: why is this the case and can I challenge it? Can new bases be added into a new creature? For that purpose I want to test the expanded genetic system in a test tube. So, we managed to create a new base pair, different from the usual A, T, C and G. In 2002, we reported our first new pair, by which a non-standard amino acid can be incorporated into a protein using a chemically synthesised gene containing the new pair.1
What is going to be the next biggest development in your field?
What is the most rewarding achievement in your career?
Sometimes we find new things by serendipity. I consider working with my colleagues very rewarding. Often ideas and new methods arise from different people in the group and from foolish ideas but precise experiments. By working together, we aim to achieve a common goal and I am ever so grateful to have my own research group.
What is the secret to running a successful research group?
We have to make sure that the correct control experiments are done and that all the data are reproducible. Obtaining reproducible and precise data is very important for the success and credibility of a research group. During the research process, we try not to miss very subtle things which could be of importance.
If you were not a scientist, what would you be?
Which scientists do you most admire and why?
I admire all the researchers that I have ever met and have known through literature. They are always inspiring me to come up with solutions.
References
1 I Hirao et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 2002, 20, 177 (DOI: 10.1038/nbt0202-177)
2 S A Benner et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 8322 (DOI: jacs111.8322-8323)
3 I Hirao et al., Nat. Methods, 2006, 3, 729 (DOI: 10.1038/nmeth915)Related Links
Ichiro Hirao's homepage
Ichiro Hirao Laboratory
External links will open in a new browser window
Also of interest
Instant insight: Rewriting the genetic code
Researchers' dreams of automated gene synthesis could soon become a reality, predict Jingdong Tian and colleagues
Andrew Houlton and colleagues at Newcastle University explain how DNA can direct electronic materials to grow on the nanoscale
Metal-mediated base pairing within the simplified nucleic acid GNA
Mark K. Schlegel, Lilu Zhang, Nicholas Pagano and Eric Meggers, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2009, 7, 476
DOI: 10.1039/b816142a
Expanded chemical diversity sampling through whole protein evolution
Amy J. Baldwin, James A. J. Arpino, Wayne R. Edwards, Eric M. Tippmann and D. Dafydd Jones, Mol. BioSyst., 2009, 5, 764
DOI: 10.1039/b904031e
Enhancing the utility of unnatural amino acid synthetases by manipulating broad substrate specificity
Audrey L. Stokes, Shigeki J. Miyake-Stoner, Jennifer C. Peeler, Duy P. Nguyen, Robert P. Hammer and Ryan A. Mehl, Mol. BioSyst., 2009, 5, 1032
DOI: 10.1039/b904032c

